Biomechanical analysis of a novel posterior construct in a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion model an in vitro study

The Spine Journal - Tập 11 - Trang 863-869 - 2011
Anil Sethi1, Aditya M. Muzumdar2, Aditya Ingalhalikar2, Rahul Vaidya1
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Suite 4D-4, UHC Detroit Receiving Hospital, 4201 St. Antoine Blvd, Detroit, MI 42801, USA
2Research Department, Globus Medical, Inc., Valley Forge Business Center, 2560 General Armistead Ave, Audubon, PA 19403, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Mahar, 2006, Biomechanical comparison of a novel percutaneous transfacet device and a traditional posterior system for single level fusion, J Spinal Disord Tech, 19, 591, 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211238.21835.e4 Suk, 2000, Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spinal fusion, Spine, 25, 1843, 10.1097/00007632-200007150-00017 Sethi, 2009, Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using unilateral pedicle screws and a translaminar screw, Eur Spine J, 18, 430, 10.1007/s00586-008-0825-4 Rhiew, 2009, Ipsilateral pedicle screw placement with contralateral percutaneous facet screws: early results with an alternative in lumbar arthrodesis, Open Access Surg, 2, 1 Beringer, 2006, Unilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, Neurosurg Focus, 20, E41, 10.3171/foc.2006.20.3.5 Best, 2006, Efficacy of translaminar facet screw fixation in circumferential interbody fusions as compared to pedicle screw fixation, J Spinal Disord Tech, 19, 98, 10.1097/01.bsd.0000179244.76244.5e Goel, 1991, Effects of rigidity of an internal fixation device. A comprehensive biomechanical investigation, Spine, 16, S155, 10.1097/00007632-199103001-00023 Grob, 1998, Translaminar screw fixation in the lumbar spine: technique, indications, results, Eur Spine J, 7, 178, 10.1007/s005860050053 Kawaguchi, 1996, Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery: a histologic and enzymatic analysis, Spine, 21, 941, 10.1097/00007632-199604150-00007 Kabins, 1992, Isolated L4-L5 fusions using the variable screw placement system: unilateral versus bilateral, J Spinal Disord, 5, 39, 10.1097/00002517-199203000-00006 Slucky, 2006, Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis, Spine J, 6, 78, 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.08.003 Jang, 2005, Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with ipsilateral pedicle screw and contralateral facet screw fixation, J Neurosurg Spine, 3, 218, 10.3171/spi.2005.3.3.0218 Park, 2004, Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature, Spine, 29, 1938, 10.1097/01.brs.0000137069.88904.03 Aota, 1995, Postfusion instability at the adjacent segments after rigid pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders, J Spinal Disord, 8, 464, 10.1097/00002517-199512000-00008 Moon, 2009, Biomechanical rigidity of an all-polyetheretherketone anterior thoracolumbar spinal reconstruction construct: an in vitro corpectomy model, Spine J, 9, 330, 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.11.012 Josue, 2011, A novel crossed rod configuration incorporating translaminar screws for occipitocervical internal fixation: an in vitro biomechanical study, Spine J, 11, 30, 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.09.013 Goel, 2006, Test protocols for evaluation of spinal implants, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 88, 103, 10.2106/JBJS.E.01363 Wilke, 1998, Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants, Eur Spine J, 7, 148, 10.1007/s005860050045 Magerl, 1984, Stabilization of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine with external skeletal fixation, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 189, 125, 10.1097/00003086-198410000-00014 Patwardhan, 1999, A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression, Spine, 24, 1003, 10.1097/00007632-199905150-00014 2005, 99 Fischgrund, 1997, 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation, Spine, 22, 2807, 10.1097/00007632-199712150-00003 Ames, 2005, Biomechanical comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion performed at 1 and 2 levels, Spine, 30, E562, 10.1097/01.brs.0000180505.80347.b1 Sasso, 2005, Analysis of operative complications in a series of 471 anterior lumbar interbody fusion procedures, Spine, 30, 670, 10.1097/01.brs.0000155423.18218.75 Tuli, 2007, A comparison of long-term outcomes of translaminar facet screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation: a prospective study, J Neurosurg Spine, 7, 287, 10.3171/SPI-07/09/287 Harris, 2004, Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine, Spine, 29, E65, 10.1097/01.BRS.0000113034.74567.86 Schleicher, 2008, Biomechanical evaluation of different asymmetrical posterior stabilization methods for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion laboratory investigation, J Neurosurg Spine, 9, 363, 10.3171/SPI.2008.9.10.363