Biogas production from vietnamese animal manure, plant residues and organic waste: influence of biomass composition on methane yield.

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies - Tập 28 Số 2 - Trang 280-289 - 2015
T T T Cu1, T X Nguyen1, J M Triolo1, L Pedersen1, V D Le1, P D Le2, S G Sommer1
1University of Southern Denmark, Faculty of Engineering, Institute of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology and Environmental Engineering, 5230 Odense M, Denmark .
2Hue University of Agriculture and Forestry, Hue City 47000, Vietnam .

Tóm tắt

Anaerobic digestion is an efficient and renewable energy technology that can produce biogas from a variety of biomasses such as animal manure, food waste and plant residues. In developing countries this technology is widely used for the production of biogas using local biomasses, but there is little information about the value of these biomasses for energy production. This study was therefore carried out with the objective of estimating the biogas production potential of typical Vietnamese biomasses such as animal manure, slaughterhouse waste and plant residues, and developing a model that relates methane (CH4) production to the chemical characteristics of the biomass. The biochemical methane potential (BMP) and biomass characteristics were measured. Results showed that piglet manure produced the highest CH4 yield of 443 normal litter (NL) CH4 kg(-1) volatile solids (VS) compared to 222 from cows, 177 from sows, 172 from rabbits, 169 from goats and 153 from buffaloes. Methane production from duckweed (Spirodela polyrrhiza) was higher than from lawn grass and water spinach at 340, 220, and 110.6 NL CH4 kg(-1) VS, respectively. The BMP experiment also demonstrated that the CH4 production was inhibited with chicken manure, slaughterhouse waste, cassava residue and shoe-making waste. Statistical analysis showed that lipid and lignin are the most significant predictors of BMP. The model was developed from knowledge that the BMP was related to biomass content of lipid, lignin and protein from manure and plant residues as a percentage of VS with coefficient of determination (R-square) at 0.95. This model was applied to calculate the CH4 yield for a household with 17 fattening pigs in the highlands and lowlands of northern Vietnam.

Từ khóa

#Biochemical Methane Potential #Biogas #Inhibition #Manures #Organic Wastes #Vietnam

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abouelenien F, Fujiwara W, Namba Y, Kosseva M, Nishio N, Nakashimada Y. Improved methane fermentation of chicken manure via ammonia removal by biogas recycle. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:6368–6373.

Amon T, Amon B, Kryvoruchko V, Zollitsch W, Mayer K, Gruber L. Biogas production from maize and dairy cattle manure—influence of biomass composition on the methane yield. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2007;118:173–182.

[Accessed March 1, 2014];Ankom technology protocol. http://www.ankom.com/procedures.aspx.

APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 21st ed. American Public Health Association; Washington, DC, USA: 2005.

Bruun S, Jensen LS, Vu V, Khanh Thi, Sommer SG. Rural household biogas digesters—An option for global warming mitigation and a potential climate bombs (Feature article) Renew Sust Energy Rev. 2014;33:736–741.

Bujoczek G, Oleszkiewicz JA, Sparling RR, Cenkowski S. High solid anaerobic digestion of chicken manure. J Agric Eng Res. 2000;76:51–60.

Cu TTT, Pham HC, Le TH, Nguyen VC, Le XA, Nguyen XT, Sommer SG. Manure management practices on biogas and non-biogas pig farms in developing countries – using livestock farms in Vietnam as an example. J Clean Prod. 2012;27:64–71.

Chen YR, Hashimoto AG. Kinetics of methane fermentation. In: Scott CD, editor. Proceedings of Symposium on Biotechnology in Energy Production and Conservation. Wiley; New York, USA: 1978. p. 269.

Cuetos MJ, Gómez X, Otero M, Morá A. Anaerobic digestion and co-digestion of slaughterhouse waste (SHW): Influence of heat and pressure pre-treatment in biogas yield. Waste Manag. 30(2010):1780–1789.

FAO Stat. [Accessed March 1, 2014];2010 http://faostat.fao.org/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=339&lang=en.

Energy fish market. Enerfish Consortium. Market Study. [Accessed May 1, 2014];2011 http://www.enerfish.eu/uploaded/results/results_9.pdf.

Goering HK, Van Soest PJ. Agriculture Handbook No. 379. Agriculture Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture; Washington, DC, USA: 1970. Forage Fiber Analysis (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures and Some Applications)

Gunaseelan VN. Anaerobic digestion of biomass for methane production: A review. Biomass Bioenergy. 1997;13:83–114.

Hashimoto AG, Chen YR, Varel VH. Livestock Wastes: A Renewable Resource. ASAE; St. Joseph. MI, USA: 1981. Theoretical aspects of methane production: State-of-the-art; pp. 86–91.

Hejnfelt A, Angelidaki I. Anaerobic digestion of slaughterhouse by-products. Biomass Bioenergy. 2009;33:1046–1054.

Herva M, Álvarez A, Roca E. Sustainable and safe design of footwear integrating ecological footprint and risk criteria. J Hazard Mater. 2011;192:1876–1881.

IPCC. [Accessed July 20, 2014];IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. 2006 http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html.

Institute of Energy. [Accessed April 15, 2014];The Power Master Plan VII. 2010. 2010 http://www.nti.org/media/pdfs/VietnamPowerDevelopmentPlan2030.pdf?_=1333146022.

Jørgensen H, Prapaspongsa T, Vu VTK, Poulsen HD. Models to quantify excretion of dry matter, nitrogen, phosphorus and carbon in growing pigs fed regional diets. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2013;4:42.

Khanh Toan P, Minh Bao N, Ha Dieu N. Energy supply, demand, and policy in Viet Nam, with future projections. Energy Policy. 2011;39:6814–6826.

Kougias PG, Boe K, Angelidaki I. Effect of organic loading rate and feedstock composition on foaming in manure-based biogas reactors. Bioresour Technol. 2013;144:1–7.

Le QS, Nguyen TN, Bui BH. Using forecasting models to calculate the potential of biogas from vegetable waste for Vietnamese conditions. J Energy Sci. 2013;1:17–24.

Leinoen A, Cuong ND. VTT Technology 134. Julkaisija – Utgivare Publisher; Finland: 2013. [Accessed October 1, 2014]. Development of Biomass Fuel Chain in Vietnam. http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/technology/2013/T134.pdf.

Møller HB, Sommer SG, Ahring BK. Methane productivity of manure straw and solid fractions of manure. Biomass Bioenergy. 2004;26:485–495.

Nijaguna BT. Biogas Technology. New Age International (P) Ltd; New Delhi, India: 2002.

Nguyen Truong Le, Cu Tran Quang. Potential of Distributed Power Generation from Biomass Residues in Vietnam - Status and Prospect. Proceedings of Electricity Supply Industry in Transition and Prospect for Asia; January 14–16, 2004; Hanoi, Vietnam. 2004. pp. 28–39.

Paixão MA, Tavares CRG, Bergamasco R, Bonifácio ALE, Costa RT. Anaerobic digestion from residue of industrial cassava industrialization with acidogenic and methanogenic physical separation phases. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2000;84–86:809–819.

Palatsi J, Vinas M, Guivernau M, Fernandez B, Flotats X. Anaerobic digestion of slaughterhouse waste: main process limitations and microbial community interactions. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:2219–27.

Perrigault T, Weatherford V, Martí-Herrero J, Poggio D. Towards thermal design optimization of tubular digesters in cold climates: A heat transfer model. Bioresour Technol. 2012;124:259–268.

Pham CH, Triolo JM, Sommer SG. Predicting methane production in simple and unheated biogas digesters at low temperatures. Appl Energy. 2014;136:1–6.

Rennuit C, Sommer SG. Decision support for the construction of farm-scale biogas digesters in developing countries with cold seasons. Energies. 2013;6:5314–5332.

Sommer SG, Hutchings NJ, Carton OT. DIAS report. No 60, Plant production. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries. Danish Institute of Agriculture Sciences; Aarhus, Danmark: 2001. Ammonia losses field applied animal manure.

Thuy Duong. [Accessed March 12, 2014];By-products from agriculture - Multibenefits. 2013 http://bhxhdaknong.gov.vn/index.php/vi/news/Tin-Dak-Nong/Tan-dung-phu-pham-tu-nong-nghiep-Loi-ich-nhieu-mat-134/

Triolo JM, Sommer SG, Moller HB, Weisbjerg MR, Jiang XY. A new algorithm to characterize biodegradability of biomass during anaerobic digestion: influence of lignin concentration on methane production potential. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:9395–9402.

Van Soest PJ. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. II. A rapid method for the determination of fiber and lignin. J Assoc Offic Agric Chem. 1963;46:829–835.

Vu QD, Tran TM, Nguyen PD, Vu CC, Vu VTK, Jensen LS. Effect of biogas technology on nutrient flows for small- and medium-scale pig farms in Vietnam. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 2012;94:1–13.

[Accessed March 18, 2014];Weather forecast website. http://www.accuweather.com/vi/vn/hanoi/353412/month/353412?monyr=1/01/2013.

Yenigün O, Demirel B. Ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion: A review. Process Biochem. 2013;48:901–911.

Zhang Q, He J, Tian M, Mao Z, Tang L, Zhang J, Zhang H. Enhancement of methane production from cassava residues by biological pretreatment using a constructed microbial consortium. Bioresource Technol. 2011;102:8899–8906.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies

Tập 28 Số 2

280-289

Thông tin tác giả