Binding of heterocyclic amines by lactic acid bacteria from miso, a fermented Japanese food

Canadian Journal of Microbiology - Tập 44 Số 2 - Trang 109-115 - 1998
R. Rajaram1, Yoshiyuki Ohta
1Laboratory for Microbial Biochemistry, Hiroshima University, Higashi Hiroshima, Japan.

Tóm tắt

Miso, a widely used Japanese fermented food was analysed for its lactic acid bacterial count on bromocresol purple agar. The binding of eight different foodborne carcinogenic heterocyclic amines to 25 bacterial isolates from miso were investigated. The heterocyclic amines used were 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl[5H]pyrido(4,3-b)indole (Trp-P-1), 3-amino-1-methyl[5H]pyrido(4,3-b)indole (Trp-P-2), 2-amino-6-methyldipyrido(1,2-a:3'2'-d)imidazole (Glu-P-1), 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo(4,5-b)pyridine (PhIP), 2-amino-dimethylimidazo(4,5f)quinoline (IQ), 2-amino-3,4-dimethylimidazo(4,5-f) quinoline (MeIQ), 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo(4,5-f)quinoxaline (MeIQx), and 2-amino-3-methyl-9H-pyrido(2,3)indole (MeAαC). The lyophilized cells of all of the isolates exhibited high binding activity towards Trp-P-1, Trp-P-2, MeAαC, and PhIP, while Glu-P-1 and IQ were not effectively bound. Of the isolates tested, the strongest and weakest binders were identified as Pediococcus acidilactici 1 and 2, respectively. Lyophilized cell wall fractions, heat-treated cells, and the cytoplasmic contents of P. acidilactici 1 and 2 were analysed for their ability to bind to different mutagens. Pure cell wall and peptidoglycan showed greater binding activity than the bacterial cells. Cytoplasmic content also showed some binding, but it was much less effective. The impact of enzymes (amylase, protease, cellulase, chitinase, muraminase, and peptidase) and acetylation of Trp-P-1 and IQ on the binding action of bacteria and cell wall material were also analysed to understand the possible processes involved in the binding of lactic acid bacteria to carcinogenic heterocyclic amines.Key words: mutagen, heterocyclic amines, lactic acid bacteria, binding, miso.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Asahara N., 1992, J. Sci. Food Agric., 58, 395, 10.1002/jsfa.2740580314

Bertram B., 1993, J. Environ. Sci. Health, 11, 1, 10.1080/10590509309373419

Block G., 1992, Cancer, 18, 1

Clarke C.H., 1975, Bacteriol. Rev., 39, 33, 10.1128/MMBR.39.1.33-53.1975

Doll R., 1981, J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 66, 1191, 10.1093/jnci/66.6.1192

Farmer R.E., 1975, J. Dairy Sci., 58, 787

Felton J.S., 1991, Mutat. Res., 259, 205, 10.1016/0165-1218(91)90118-6

Ferguson L.R., 1993, Mutat. Res., 319, 257, 10.1016/0165-1218(93)90013-4

Gunther H.L., 1961, J. Gen. Microbiol., 26, 185, 10.1099/00221287-26-2-185

Harris P.J., 1991, Mutat. Res., 260, 203, 10.1016/0165-1218(91)90009-B

Kada T., 1984, Mutat. Res., 4, 149, 10.1016/0165-7992(84)90088-5

Morse M.A., 1993, Carcinogenesis, 14, 1737, 10.1093/carcin/14.9.1737

Nagao M., 1993, Mutat. Res., 290, 43, 10.1016/0027-5107(93)90031-A

Negishi C., 1986, Mutat. Res., 175, 23, 10.1016/0165-7992(86)90140-5

Ohgaki H., 1991, Mutat. Res., 259, 399, 10.1016/0165-1218(91)90130-E

Overvik E., 1990, Mutagenesis, 5, 437, 10.1093/mutage/5.5.437

Reddy G.V., 1973, J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 50, 815, 10.1093/jnci/50.3.815

Sugimura T., 1982, Cancer, 49, 1970, 10.1002/1097-0142(19820515)49:10<1970::AID-CNCR2820491005>3.0.CO;2-F

Sugimura T., 1985, Mutat. Res., 150, 33, 10.1016/0027-5107(85)90098-3

Watanabe H., 1991, Technol. Miso, 39, 29

Zhang X.B., 1991, J. Dairy Sci., 74, 746

Zhang X.B., 1991, J. Dairy Sci., 74, 1477, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78306-9

Zhang X.B., 1991, J. Sci. Food Agri., 57, 253, 10.1002/jsfa.2740570209

Zhang X.B., 1992, Can. J. Microbiol., 38, 614, 10.1139/m92-101

Zhang X.B., 1990, J. Dairy Sci., 73, 2702, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78955-2