Bildgebende Verfahren und ihre Bedeutung bei der Indikationsstellung zum Herzkatheter

R. Dörr1
1Praxisklinik Herz und Gefäße Kardiologie, Angiologie, Radiologie, Nuklearmedizin – fachübergreifende Gemeinschaftspraxis –, Akademische Lehrpraxisklinik der TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Arlington Medical Resources Inc (2006) The myocardial perfusion study market guide (US & Europe). Malvern, PA 19355, USA (http://www.amr-data.com)

Baer FM (2005) Frühdiagnostik der funktionell relevanten koronaren Herzerkrankung. Internist 46:389–400

Bateman TM (1997) Clinical relevance of a normal myocardial perfusion scintigraphic study. J Nucl Cardiol 4:172–173

Berman DS, Germano G, Shaw LJ (1999) The role of nuclear cardiology in clinical decision making. Semin Nucl Med 29:280–297

Bundesärztekammer (BÄK), Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF), Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV) (2006) Nationales Programm für Versorgungs-Leitlinien. Nationale Versorgungs-Leitlinie Chronische KHK. Kurzfassung, Version 1.4, November 2006. Berlin: ÄZW (http://www.khk.versorgungsleitlinien.de)

Braunwald E (1989) Unstable angina: a classification. Circulation 80:410–414

Bruckenberger E (2006) 18. Herzbericht 2005. Hannover

Campeau L (1976) Letter: Grading of angina pectoris. Circulation 54:522–523

Des Prez RD, Shaw LJ, Gillespie RL, Jaber WA, Noble GL, Soman P, Wolinsky DG, Williams KA (2005) Costeffectiveness of myocardial perfusion imaging: a summary of the currently available literature. J Nucl Cardiol 12:750–759

Diamond GA, Forrester JS (1979) Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med 300:1350–1358

Dietz R, Rauch B (2003) Leitlinie zur Diagnose und Behandlung der chronischen koronaren Herzerkrankung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung (DGK). Z Kardiol 92:501–521

Dörr R (2006) Stabile Angina pectoris. Diagnostische Behandlungspfade im Vergleich. Herz 31:827–835

Fox K et al (2006) Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary. Eur Heart J 27:1341–1381

Gauri AJ, Raxwal VK, Roux L, Fearon WF, Froelicher VF (2001) Effects of chronotropic incompetence and betablocker use on the exercise treadmill test in men. Am Heart J 142:136–141

Germano G, Kiat H, Kavanagh PB, Moriel M, Mazzanti M, Su HT, Van Train KF, Berman DS (1995) Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med 36:2138–2147

Germano G, Berman DS (2001) Quantitative gated SPECT. J Nucl Med 42:528–529

Gibbons RJ et al (2002) ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Exercise Testing). Circulation 106:1883–1892

Gibbons RJ et al (2003) ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina). Circulation 107:149–158

Hamm CW, Braunwald E (2000) A classification of unstable angina revisited. Circulation 102:118–122

Klocke FJ et al (2003) ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). Circulation 108:1404–1418

Levenson B, Albrecht A, Göhring S, Haerer W, Herholz H, Reifart N, Sauer G, Troger B, für das QuIK-Register des Bundesverbandes Niedergelassener Kardiologen (BNK) (2007) 5. Bericht des Bundesverbandes Niedergelassener Kardiologen zur Qualitätssicherung in der diagnostischen und therapeutischen Invasivkardiologie 2003–2005. Herz 32:73–84

Mohr VD, Bauer J, Döbler K, Eckert O, Fischer B, Woldenga C (2006) Qualität sichtbar machen. BQS Qualitätsreport 2005. Druckversion und Langfassung CD-ROM. Düsseldorf: BQS

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (November 2003) Guidance: Angina and myocardial infarction – myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. (http://guidance.nice.org.uk/TA73/?c=91497)

O'Rourke RA, Brundage BH, Froelicher VF et al (2000) American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association expert consensus document on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:326–340

Pryor DB, Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL et al (1983) Estimating the likelihood of significant coronary artery disease. Am J Med 75:771–780

Pryor DB, Shaw L, McCants CB et al (1993) Value of the history and physical in identifying patients at increased risk for coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 118:81–90

Sabharwal NK, Lahiri A (2003) Role of myocardial perfusion imaging for risk stratification in suspected or known coronary artery. Heart 89:1291–1297

Schäfers M (2001) (im Namen des interdisziplinären Arbeitskreises „Positionsbericht Nuklearkardiologie“ der Arbeitsgemeinschaft „Nuklearkardiologie“ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Nuklearmedizin und der Arbeitsgruppe „Nuklearkardiologische Diagnostik“ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung). Methoden und klinische Anwendung der Nuklearkardiologie: Positionsbericht. (www.http://www.dgk.org/leitlinien)

Schuijf JD, Shaw LJ, Wijns W, Lamb HJ, Poldermans D, de Roos A, van der Wall EE, Bax JJ (2005) Cardiac imaging in coronary artery disease: differing modalities. Heart 91:1110–1117

Sharir T, Kang X, Germano G, Bax JJ, Shaw LJ, Gransar H, Cohen I, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Berman DS (2006) Prognostic value of poststress left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT in women and men: genderrelated differences in normal limits and outcomes. J Nucl Cardiol 13:495–506

Shaw LJ, Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Marwick TH, Lauer MS, Heller GV, Iskandrian AE, Kesler KL, Travin MI, Lewin HC, Hendel RC, Borges- Neto S, Miller DD (1999) The economic consequences of available diagnostic and prognostic strategies for the evaluation of stable angina patients: an observational assessment of the value of precatheterization ischemia. Economics of Noninvasive Diagnosis (END) Multicenter Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:661–669

Shaw LJ, Iskandrian AE (2004) Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 11:171–185

Smanio PE, Watson DD, Segalla DL, Vinson EL, Smith WH, Beller GA (1997) Value of gating of technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 30:1687–1692

Underwood SR, Godman B, Salyani S, Ogle JR, Ell PJ (1999) Economics of myocardial perfusion imaging in Europe -the EMPIRE Study. Eur Heart J 20:157–166

Underwood SR (2003) Do we need more nuclear cardiologists in Europe? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30:457–459

Underwood SR, Anagnostopoulos C, Cerqueira M, Ell PJ, Flint EJ, Harbinson M, Kelion AD, Al-Mohammad A, Prvulovich EM, Shaw LJ, Tweddel AC (2004) Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31:261–291

Underwood SR (2004) NICE in the United Kingdom: a milestone for nuclear cardiology. J Nucl Cardiol 11:660–663

Wackers FJ, Zaret BL (1995) Radionuclide stress myocardial perfusion imaging: the future gatekeeper for coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol 2:358–359

Zaret BL (1996) Implications of nuclear cardiology as a gatekeeper. J Nucl Cardiol 3:1

Zimmermann R, vom Dahl J, Schäfers M, Schwaiger M (2002) Positionsbericht nuklearkardiologische Diagnostik – Update. Z Kardiol 91:88–92