Beyond practitioner and researcher: 15 roles adopted by actors in transdisciplinary and transformative research processes
Tóm tắt
To tackle complex sustainability problems, science and practice must join forces and interact in the processes of knowledge co-production. This central claim of sustainability science requires all actors to do more than simply participate in a workshop or carry out traditional research. It is essential to provide clarity to actors about the roles to adopt in these processes, especially in terms of planning collaborations—with whom, when, and how. Therefore, in this paper we identify, describe, and discuss 15 roles for actors involved in such processes. We undertook a systematic literature review to identify papers with precise descriptions of transdisciplinary (td) and transformative (tf) research processes. We focused on the common occurrence of activities undertaken by actors by applying 72 activity codes a total of 549 times. Subclusters of activities were identified by means of a hierarchical cluster analysis and these were condensed into 15 roles. The roles can be categorised in four activity realms: field, academia, boundary management, and knowledge co-production. The roles of the Data Supplier, the Field Expert, and the Application Expert are adopted by actors who originate from the field, whereas the roles of the Scientific Analyst and the Knowledge Collector are primarily adopted by researchers. Furthermore, we identified 10 roles within the activity realms of the knowledge co-production process and boundary management. The high number and diversity of roles, especially in the realm of boundary management, reveals the importance of a comprehensive approach to coordination, communication, and process design.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Biddle BJ (1979) Role theory: expectations, identities, and behaviors. Academic Press
Bracken LJ, Bulkeley HA, Whitman G (2014) Transdisciplinary research: understanding the stakeholder perspective. J Environ Planning Manag 58(7):1291–1308. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2014.921596
Brundiers K, Wiek A, Kay B (2013) The role of transacademic interface managers in transformational sustainability research and education. Sustainability 5(11):4614–4636. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5114614
Bulten E, Hessels LK, Hordijk M, Segrave AJ (2021) Conflicting roles of researchers in sustainability transitions: balancing action and reflection. Sustain Sci 3(6):949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00938-7
Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jäger J, Mitchell RB (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100(14):8086–8091. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231332100
Chilvers J, Longhurst N (2016) Participation in transition(s): reconceiving public engagements in energy transitions as co-produced, emergent and diverse. J Environ Planning Policy Manag 18(5):585–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1110483
Dellwing M, Prus RC (2012) Einführung in die interaktionistische Ethnografie: Soziologie im Außendienst. Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin
Duncan R, Robson-Williams M, Edwards S (2020) A close examination of the role and needed expertise of brokers in bridging and building science policy boundaries in environmental decision making. Palgrave Commun 6(1):477. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0448-x
Efron SE, Ravid R (2019) Writing the literature review: a practical guide. The Guilford Press
Felt U, Igelsböck J, Schikowitz A, Völker T (2012) Challenging participation in sustainability research. Int J Deliber Mech Sci 1:4–34. https://doi.org/10.17583/demesci.2012.353
Felt U, Ingelsböck J, Schikowitz A, Völker T (2013) Growing into what? The (un-)disciplined socialisation of early stage researchers in transdisciplinary research. High Educ 65(4):511–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9560-1
Fischer LB, Newig J (2016) Importance of actors and agency in sustainability transitions: a systematic exploration of the literature. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050476
Fritz L, Binder CR (2020) Whose knowledge, whose values? An empirical analysis of power in transdisciplinary sustainability research. Eur J Fut Res 8(1):1593. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-020-0161-4
Harris F, Lyon F (2013) Transdisciplinary environmental research: building trust across professional cultures. J Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.02.006
Hilger A, Keil A (2021) Education for sustainable development with transdisciplinary-oriented courses - experiences and recommendations for future collaborations in higher education teaching. J Geogr High Educ. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2021.1946765
Hilger A, Rose M, Wanner M (2018) Changing faces—factors influencing the roles of researchers in real-world laboratories. GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 27(2):138–145
Horlings LG, Nieto-Romero M, Pisters S, Soini K (2020) Operationalising transformative sustainability science through place-based research: the role of researchers. Sustain Sci 15(2):467–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00757-x
Jahn T, Bergmann M, Keil F (2012) Transdisciplinarity: between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecol Econ 79:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017
Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ, Schellnhuber HJ, Bolin B, Dickson NM, Faucheux S, Gallopin GC, Gruebler A, Huntley B, Jäger J, Jodha NS, Kasperson RE, Mabogunje A, Matson P, Svedin U (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292(5517):641–642. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1059386
Klenk NL, Meehan K (2017) Transdisciplinary sustainability research beyond engagement models: toward adventures in relevance. Environ Sci Policy 78:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.09.006
Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas CJ (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci 7(S1):25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
Lindsay J, Rogers BC, Church E, Gunn A, Hammer K, Dean AJ, Fielding K (2019) The role of community champions in long-term sustainable urban water planning. Water 11(3):1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030476
Miah JH, Griffiths A, McNeill R, Poonaji I, Martin R, Morse S, Yang A, Sadhukhan J (2015) A small-scale transdisciplinary process to maximising the energy efficiency of food factories: insights and recommendations from the development of a novel heat integration framework. Sustain Sci 10(4):621–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0331-7
Miller TR (2013) Constructing sustainability science: emerging perspectives and research trajectories. Sustain Sci 8(2):279–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0180-6
Miller TR, Wiek A, Sarewitz D, Robinson J, Olsson L, Kriebel D, Loorbach D (2014) The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda. Sustain Sci 9(2):239–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0224-6
Mobjörk M (2010) Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity: a refined classification of transdisciplinary research. Futures 42(8):866–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2010.03.003
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the prisma statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Newton A, Elliott M (2016) A typology of stakeholders and guidelines for engagement in transdisciplinary, participatory processes. Front Mar Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00230
Ober S, Paulick-Thiel C, Köppen E (2019) Einbindung von PraxispartnerInnen in transdisziplinären Forschungsprojekten: Herausforderungen und Empfehlungen. Nachhaltiges Wirtschaften - NaWiKo Synthese Working Paper No 4
Pohl C, Rist S, Zimmermann A, Fry P, Gurung GS, Schneider F, Speranza CI, Kiteme B, Boillat S, Serrano E, Hadorn GH, Wiesmann U (2010) Researchers’ roles in knowledge co-production: experience from sustainability research in kenya, Switzerland, bolivia and nepal. Sci Public Policy 37(4):267–281. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X496628
Reed MS, Vella S, Challies E, de Vente J, Frewer L, Hohenwallner-Ries D, Huber T, Neumann RK, Oughton EA, Sidoli del Ceno J, van Delden H (2018) A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work? Restor Ecol 26:S7–S17. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12541
Rose M, Maibaum K (2020) Meeting the challenge of (co-)designing real-world laboratories: insights from the well-being transformation wuppertal project. GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 29(3):154–160. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.29.3.5
Sarkki S, Heikkinen HI, Karjalainen TP (2013) Sensitivity in transdisciplinary projects: a case of reindeer management in Finland. Land Use Policy 34:183–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.03.004
Schäpke N, Stelzer F, Bergmann M, Lang DJ (2016) Tentative theses on transformative research in real-world laboratories: first insights from the accompanying research forreal. Technikfolgeabschätzung Theorie Und Praxis 25(3):45–51
Schauppenlehner-Kloyber E, Penker M (2015) Managing group processes in transdisciplinary future studies: how to facilitate social learning and capacity building for self-organised action towards sustainable urban development? Futures 65:57–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.08.012
Schimank U (2016) Handeln und Strukturen: Einführung in die akteurtheoretische Soziologie (5, revised edition). Grundlagen der Soziologie. Beltz Juventa
Schneidewind U, Augenstein K (2016) Three schools of transformation thinking: the impact of ideas, institutions, and technological innovation on transformation processes. GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 25(2):88–93. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.2.7
Schneidewind U, Singer-Brodowski M, Augenstein K, Stelzer F (2016) Pledge for a transformative science: a conceptual framework (Wuppertal Paper No. 191). Wuppertal
Scholz RW (2017) The normative dimension in transdisciplinarity, transition management, and transformation sciences: new roles of science and universities in sustainable transitioning. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060991
Scholz RW (2020) Transdisciplinarity: science for and with society in light of the university’s roles and functions. Sustain Sci 23(3):245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00794-x
Scholz RW, Steiner G (2015a) The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: part I - theoretical foundations. Sustain Sci 10(4):527–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0326-4
Scholz RW, Steiner G (2015b) The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: part ii - what constraints and obstacles do we meet in practice? Sustain Sci 10(4):653–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0327-3
Snyder H (2019) Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res 104:333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Stauffacher M (2010) Beyond neocorporatism? Transdisciplinary case studies as a means for collaborative learning in sustainable development. In: Gross M, Heinrichs H (eds) Environmental sociology. Springer, Berlin
Stauffacher M, Scholz RW (2012) Transdisziplinäre Lehrforschung am Beispiel der Fallstudien der ETH Zürich. In: Dusseldorp M, Beecroft R (eds) Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden. Springer VS, pp 277–291
Stauffacher M, Flüeler T, Krütli P, Scholz RW (2008) Analytic and dynamic approach to collaboration: a transdisciplinary case study on sustainable landscape development in a swiss prealpine region. Syst Pract Action Res 21(6):409–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-008-9107-7
Stoecker R (1999) Are academics irrelevant? roles for scholars in participatory research. Am Behav Sci 42(5):840–854. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027649921954561
United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (1992) Agenda 21: Programme of action for sustainable development. Rio declaration on environment and development. Statement of forest principles; the final text of agreements negotiated by governments at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), 3–14 June 1992, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2. print). Department of Public Information United Nations
VERBI Software (2019) MAXQDA 2020 [Computer software]. VERBI Software, Berlin
VERBI Software (2020) MAXQDA 2020 Manual. Berlin. https://www.maxqda.com/help-mx20/welcome
Wanner M, Hilger A, Westerkowski J, Rose M, Schäpke N, Stelzer F (2018) Towards a cyclical concept of real-world laboratories: a transdisciplinary research practice for sustainability transitions. DisP Plan Rev 54(2):94–114
Wesselink A, Paavola J, Fritsch O, Renn O (2011) Rationales for public participation in environmental policy and governance: practitioners’ perspectives. Environ Plan A 43(11):2688–2704. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44161
Wiek A (2007) Challenges of transdisciplinary research as interactive knowledge generation? Experiences from transdisciplinary case study research. GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 16(1):52–57. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.16.1.14
Wittmayer JM (2016) Transition management, action research and actor roles: understanding local sustainability transitions. Erasmus University Rotterdam
Wittmayer JM, Schäpke N (2014) Action, research and participation: roles of researchers in sustainability transitions. Sustain Sci 9(4):483–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0258-4
Wittmayer JM, Avelino F, van Steenbergen F, Loorbach D (2017) Actor roles in transition: insights from sociological perspectives. Environ Innov Soc Trans 24:45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.10.003