Beyond Technology: Demand-Side Solutions for Climate Change Mitigation

Annual Review of Environment and Resources - Tập 41 Số 1 - Trang 173-198 - 2016
Felix Creutzig1,2, Blanca Fernandez1,2, Helmut Haberl3, Radhika Khosla4, Yacob Mulugetta5, Karen C. Seto6
1Department of Economics of Climate Change, Technical University of Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany
2Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change, 10829 Berlin, Germany
3Institute of Social Ecology Vienna, Alpen-Adria University Klagenfurt, 1070 Vienna, Austria
4Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi 110021, India
5Department of Science, Technology, Engineering and Public Policy, University College London, WC1E 6BT London, United Kingdom
6Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511;

Tóm tắt

The assessment literature on climate change solutions to date has emphasized technologies and options based on cost-effectiveness analysis. However, many solutions to climate change mitigation misalign with such analytical frameworks. Here, we examine demand-side solutions, a crucial class of mitigation options that go beyond technological specification and cost-benefit analysis. To do so, we synthesize demand-side mitigation options in the urban, building, transport, and agricultural sectors. We also highlight the specific nature of demand-side solutions in the context of development. We then discuss key analytical considerations to integrate demand-side options into overarching assessments on mitigation. Such a framework would include infrastructure solutions that interact with endogenous preference formation. Both hard infrastructures, such as the built environment, and soft infrastructures, such as habits and norms, shape behavior and as a consequence offer significant potential for reducing overall energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions. We conclude that systemic infrastructural and behavioral change will likely be a necessary component of a transition to a low-carbon society.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Stocker T, 2014, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis

Field CB, 2014, Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

3. Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Kadner S, Minx J, et al. 2014. Technical summary. See Ref.62, pp. 31–107

4. Anderson K. 2015. Duality in climate science. Nat. Geosci. 8(12):898–900

5. Le Quéré C, Moriarty R, Andrew R, Peters G, Ciais P, et al. 2015. Global carbon budget 2014. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 7(1):47–85

6. Creutzig F. 2014. Economic and ecological views on climate change mitigation with bioenergy and negative emissions. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy 8(1):4–10

7. Fuss S, Canadell JG, Peters GP, Tavoni M, Andrew RM, et al. 2014. Betting on negative emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 4(10):850–53

8. Stephens JC. 2015. Carbon capture and storage: a controversial climate mitigation approach. Int. Spect. 50(1):74–84

9. Wilson C, Grubler A, Gallagher KS, Nemet GF. 2012. Marginalization of end-use technologies in energy innovation for climate protection. Nat. Clim. Change 2(11):780–88

10. Corbera E, Calvet-Mir L, Hughes H, Paterson M. 2016. Patterns of authorship in the IPCC Working Group III report. Nat. Clim. Change 6(1):94–99

11. Sovacool BK, Ryan S, Stern P, Janda K, Rochlin G, et al. 2015. Integrating social science in energy research. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 6:95–99

12. Middlemiss L, Parrish BD. 2010. Building capacity for low-carbon communities: the role of grassroots initiatives. Energy Policy 38(12):7559–66

13. Azevedo IM. 2014. Consumer end-use energy efficiency and rebound effects. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 39:393–418

10.2307/3822935

15. Spaargaren G. 2011. Theories of practices: agency, technology, and culture: exploring the relevance of practice theories for the governance of sustainable consumption practices in the new world-order. Glob. Environ. Change 21(3):813–22

Tribe LH, 1976, When Values Conflict: Essays on Environmental Analysis, Discourse, and Decision.

17. Roy J, Dowd A, Muller A, Pal S, Prata N. 2012. Lifestyles, well-being and energy. See Ref. 69, pp. 1527–48

18. Seto K, Dhakal S, Bigio AG, Blanco H, Delgado GC, et al. 2014. Human settlements, infrastructure, and spatial planning. See Ref. 62, pp. 923–1000

10.3141/1977-17

20. Vega A, Reynolds-Feighan A. 2009. A methodological framework for the study of residential location and travel-to-work mode choice under central and suburban employment destination patterns. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 43(4):401–19

21. Brownstone D, Golob TF. 2009. The impact of residential density on vehicle usage and energy consumption. J. Urban Econ. 65(1):91–98

10.3141/1831-22

10.1016/j.uclim.2014.09.003

24. Ewing R, Handy S. 2009. Measuring the unmeasurable: urban design qualities related to walkability. J.Urban Des. 14(1):65–84

25. Barrington-Leigh C, Millard-Ball A. 2015. A century of sprawl in the United States. PNAS 112(27):8244–49

26. Khattak AJ, Rodriguez D. 2005. Travel behavior in neo-traditional neighborhood developments: a case study in USA. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 39(6):481–500

27. Rickwood P. 2009. Residential operational energy use. Urban Policy Res. 27(2):137–55

28. Creutzig F, Baiocchi G, Bierkandt R, Pichler P-P, Seto KC. 2015. Global typology of urban energy use and potentials for an urbanization mitigation wedge. PNAS 112(20):6283–88

10.1086/257839

Glaeser EL, 2004, Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics, 4, 2481

31. Ewing R, Cervero R. 2010. Travel and the built environment: a meta-analysis. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 76(3):265–94

10.1080/01441647.2015.1079277

33. Grimes-Casey HG, Keoleian GA, Willcox B. 2009. Carbon emission targets for driving sustainable mobility with US light-duty vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43(3):585–90

Hodges T, 2010, Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions, 1

35. Sims R, Schaeffer R, Creutzig F, Cruz-Nunez X, D'Agosto M, et al. 2014. Transport. See Ref. 62, pp. 599–670

10.1126/science.aac8033

37. Nykvist B, Whitmarsh L. 2008. A multi-level analysis of sustainable mobility transitions: niche development in the UK and Sweden. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 75(9):1373–87

Vivier J, 2005, Mobility in Cities Database

39. Ewing R, Bartholomew K, Winkelman S, Walters J, Chen D. 2009. Growing cooler: the evidence on urban development and climate change. Renew. Resour. J. 25(4):6–13

40. Echenique MH, Hargreaves AJ, Mitchell G, Namdeo A. 2012. Growing cities sustainably: Does urban form really matter? J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 78(2):121–37

41. Salon D, Boarnet MG, Handy S, Spears S, Tal G. 2012. How do local actions affect VMT? A critical review of the empirical evidence. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 17(7):495–508

42. Eliasson J. 2008. Lessons from the Stockholm congestion charging trial. Transp. Policy 15(6):395–404

TFL (Transp. Lond.), 2007, Fifth Annual Report, TFL

44. Woodcock J, Edwards P, Tonne C, Armstrong BG, Ashiru O, et al. 2009. Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: urban land transport. Lancet 374(9705):1930–43

45. Creutzig F, He D. 2009. Climate change mitigation and co-benefits of feasible transport demand policies in Beijing. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 14(2):120–31

46. Creutzig F, Mühlhoff R, Römer J. 2012. Decarbonizing urban transport in European cities: Four cases show possibly high co-benefits. Environ. Res. Lett. 7(4):044042

47. Lefèvre B. 2009. Long-term energy consumptions of urban transportation: a prospective simulation of “transport-land uses” policies in Bangalore. Energy Policy 37(3):940–53

48. Viguié V, Hallegatte S. 2012. Trade-offs and synergies in urban climate policies. Nat. Clim. Change 2(5):334–37

10.1016/j.trd.2015.08.006

50. Bamberg S, Rölle D, Weber C, Fujii S, Kitamura R. 2003. What does a one-month free bus ticket do to habitual drivers? An experimental analysis of habit and attitude change. Transportation 30(1):81–95

51. Pedersen T, Friman M, Kristensson P. 2011. Affective forecasting: predicting and experiencing satisfaction with public transportation. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 41(8):1926–46

52. Larrick RP, Soll JB. 2008. The MPG illusion. Science 320(5883):1593–94

10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.003

54. Goetzke F, Rave T. 2011. Bicycle use in Germany: explaining differences between municipalities with social network effects. Urban Stud. 48(2):427–37

10.1007/978-1-4419-7991-9_51

56. Bento AM, Hughes JE, Kaffine D. 2013. Carpooling and driver responses to fuel price changes: evidence from traffic flows in Los Angeles. J. Urban Econ. 77:41–56

57. Dewan KK, Ahmad I. 2007. Carpooling: a step to reduce congestion (a case study of Delhi). Eng. Lett. 14(1):61–66

58. Cairns S, Sloman L, Newson C, Anable J, Kirkbride A, Goodwin P. 2008. Smarter choices: assessing the potential to achieve traffic reduction using “soft measures.” Transp. Rev. 28(5):593–618

59. Sager J, Apte JS, Lemoine DM, Kammen DM. 2011. Reduce growth rate of light-duty vehicle travel to meet 2050 global climate goals. Environ. Res. Lett. 6(2):024018

60. Peeters P, Dubois G. 2010. Tourism travel under climate change mitigation constraints. J. Transp. Geogr. 18(3):447–57

UNWTO (UN World Tour. Organ.), UNEP (UN Environ. Progr.), 2008, Climate Change and Tourism: Responding to Global Challenges

Edenhofer O, 2014, Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

63. Ürge-Vorsatz D, Eyre N, Graham D, Harvey D, Hertwich E, et al. 2012. Energy end-use: buildings. See Ref. 69, pp. 649–760

64. Lu A, Bamford N, Charters WWS, Robinson J. 1999. Optimising embodied energy in commercial office development. Presented at COBRA 1999—The Challenge of Change: Construction and Building for the New Millennium, Salford, The University of Salford, 1–2 Sept.

65. Herring H. 2006. Energy efficiency—a critical view. Energy 31(1):10–20

66. Sanquist TF, Orr H, Shui B, Bittner AC. 2012. Lifestyle factors in U.S. residential electricity consumption. Energy Policy 42:354–64

67. Oikonomou V, Becchis F, Steg L, Russolillo D. 2009. Energy saving and energy efficiency concepts for policy making. Energy Policy 37(11):4787–96

Ürge-Vorsatz D, 2009, Eur. Counc. Energy Effic. Econ. Summer Study (ECEEE 2009 Proc.), 185

Johansson TB, Patwardhan A, Nakicenovic N, Gomez-Echeverri L, 2012, Global Energy Assessment: Toward a Sustainable Future

70. Zhang S, Yang X, Jiang Y, Wei Q. 2010. Comparative analysis of energy use in China building sector: current status, existing problems and solutions. Front. Energy Power Eng. China 4(1):2–21

71. Batty WJ, Al-Hinai H, Probert SD. 1991. Natural-cooling techniques for residential buildings in hot climates. Appl. Energy 39(4):301–37

Zhaojian L, 2007, J. Heat. Vent. Air Cond., 8, 2015.02.02

Grinshpon M., 2011, A Comparison of Residential Energy Consumption Between the United States and China

Xiao XJ, 2011, Proc. World Sustain. Build. Conf., SB11 Helsinki, Oct, 18

75. Dietz T, Gardner GT, Gilligan J, Stern PC, Vandenbergh MP. 2009. Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. PNAS 106(44):18452–56

76. Fujino J, Hibino G, Ehara T, Matsuoka Y, Masui T, Kainuma M. 2008. Back-casting analysis for 70% emission reduction in Japan by 2050. Clim. Policy 8(Suppl. 1):S108–24

Eyre N, 2010, Energy 2050: Making the Transition to a Secure Low-Carbon Energy System, 258

78. Wei Y-M, Liu L-C, Fan Y, Wu G. 2007. The impact of lifestyle on energy use and CO2emission: an empirical analysis of China's residents. Energy Policy 35(1):247–57

79. Sukla PR, Dhar S, Mahapatra D. 2008. Low-carbon society scenarios for India. Clim. Policy 8(Suppl. 1):S156–76

80. Jaboyedoff P, Roulet C-A, Dorer V, Weber A, Pfeiffer A. 2004. Energy in air-handling units—results of the airless European project. Energy Build. 36(4):391–99

81. Lin Z, Deng S. 2004. A study on the characteristics of nighttime bedroom cooling load in tropics and subtropics. Build. Environ. 39(9):1101–14

82. Murakami S, Levine MD, Yoshino H, Inoue T, Ikaga T, et al. 2009. Overview of energy consumption and GHG mitigation technologies in the building sector of Japan. Energy Effic. 2(2):179–94

Smith CB, 2007, CRC Handbook of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, 305

84. Lucon O, Ürge-Vorsatz D, Ahmed AZ, Akbari H, Bertoldi P, Cabeza LF, et al. 2014. Buildings. See Ref. 62, pp. 671–738

85. Harris J, Diamond R, Iyer M, Payne C, Blumstein C, Siderius H-P. 2008. Towards a sustainable energy balance: progressive efficiency and the return of energy conservation. Energy Effic. 1(3):175–88

10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.315

87. Ramos A, Gago A, Labandeira X, Linares P. 2015. The role of information for energy efficiency in the residential sector. Energy Econ 52:S17–29

88. D'Oca S, Corgnati SP, Buso T. 2014. Smart meters and energy savings in Italy: determining the effectiveness of persuasive communication in dwellings. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 7:131–42

89. Nachreiner M, Mack B, Matthies E, Tampe-Mai K. 2015. An analysis of smart metering information systems: a psychological model of self-regulated behavioural change. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 9:85–97

90. Lopes MAR, Antunes CH, Martins N. 2015. Towards more effective behavioural energy policy: an integrative modelling approach to residential energy consumption in Europe. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 7:84–98

10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198719526.003.0010

92. Janda KB, Topouzi M. 2015. Telling tales: using stories to remake energy policy. Build. Res. Inf. 43(4):516–33

93. Wilson C, Dowlatabadi H. 2007. Models of decision making and residential energy use. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 32(1):169

94. Haberl H. 2001. The energetic metabolism of societies: Part II: empirical examples. J. Ind. Ecol. 5(2):71–88

FAO (Food Agric. Organ. UN), 2006, World Agriculture: Towards 2030/2050. Interim Report.

96. Smith P, Bustamante M, Ahammad H, Clark H, Dong H, et al. 2014. Agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU). See Ref. 62, pp. 811–922

97. Field CB, Barros VR, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Abdrabo MAK, et al. 2014. Summary for policymakers. See Ref. 2, pp. 1–32

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.10.002

99. Smith P, Haberl H, Popp A, Erb K, Lauk C, et al. 2013. How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals? Glob. Change Biol. 19(8):2285–302

100. Stehfest E, Bouwman L, van Vuuren DP, den Elzen MGJ, Eickhout B, Kabat P. 2009. Climate benefits of changing diet. Clim. Change 95(1–2):83–102

101. Tukker A, Goldbohm RA, de Koning A, Verheijden M, Kleijn R, et al. 2011. Environmental impacts of changes to healthier diets in Europe. Ecol. Econ. 70(10):1776–88

102. Popp A, Lotze-Campen H, Bodirsky B. 2010. Food consumption, diet shifts and associated non-CO2greenhouse gases from agricultural production. Glob. Environ. Change 20(3):451–62

103. González AD, Frostell B, Carlsson-Kanyama A. 2011. Protein efficiency per unit energy and per unit greenhouse gas emissions: potential contribution of diet choices to climate change mitigation. Food Policy 36(5):562–70

104. Ewing R, Rong F. 2008. The impact of urban form on US residential energy use. Hous. Policy Debate 19(1):1–30

105. Mullainathan S, Allcott H. 2010. Behavior and energy policy. Science 327(5970):1204–5

106. Baiocchi G, Creutzig F, Minx J, Pichler P-P. 2015. A spatial typology of human settlements and their CO2emissions in England. Glob. Environ. Change 34:13–21

10.1596/978-1-4648-0163-1

ADB (Asian Dev. Bank), 2012, Asian Development Outlook 2012: Confronting Rising Inequality in Asia

10.2307/j.ctt3fgxbm

110. Ürge-Vorsatz D, Herrero ST, Dubash NK, Lecocq F. 2014. Measuring the co-benefits of climate change mitigation. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 39:549–82

111. von Stechow C, McCollum D, Riahi K, Minx JC, Kriegler E, et al. 2015. Integrating global climate change mitigation goals with other sustainability objectives: a synthesis. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 40(1):363–94

112. Navroz D, Raghunandan D, Sant G, Sreenivas A. 2013. Indian climate change policy: exploring a co-benefits approach. Econ. Polit. Wkly. 48(22):47–61

113. Khosla R, Dukkipati S, Dubash NK, Sreenivas A, Cohen B. 2015. Toward methodologies for multiple-objective based energy policy. Econ. Polit. Wkly. 50(49):49–59

10.1596/978-1-4648-0479-3

115. Pachauri S, Ürge-Vorsatz D, LaBelle M. 2012. Synergies between energy efficiency and energy access policies and strategies. Glob. Policy 3(2):187–97

116. Mulugetta Y, Urban F. 2010. Deliberating on low carbon development. Energy Policy 38(12):7546–49

117. Bowen A, Fankhauser S. 2011. The green growth narrative: paradigm shift or just spin? Glob. Environ. Change 21(4):1157–59

118. Kumar N. 2004. Changing geographic access to and locational efficiency of health services in two Indian districts between 1981 and 1996. Soc. Sci. Med. 58(10):2045–67

119. Chen H, Jia B, Lau S. 2008. Sustainable urban form for Chinese compact cities: challenges of a rapid urbanized economy. Habitat Int. 32(1):28–40

120. Perkins A, Hamnett S, Pullen S, Zito R, Trebilcock D. 2009. Transport, housing and urban form: the life cycle energy consumption and emissions of city centre apartments compared with suburban dwellings. Urban Policy Res. 27(4):377–96

121. Reilly MK, O'Mara MP, Seto KC. 2009. From Bangalore to the Bay Area: comparing transportation and activity accessibility as drivers of urban growth. Landsc. Urban Plan. 92(1):24–33

122. Zegras C. 2010. The built environment and motor vehicle ownership and use: evidence from Santiago de Chile. Urban Stud. 47(8):1793–817

123. Hou Q, Li S-M. 2011. Transport infrastructure development and changing spatial accessibility in the Greater Pearl River Delta, China, 1990–2020. J. Transp. Geogr. 19(6):1350–60

124. Adeyinka AM. 2013. Spatial distribution, pattern and accessibility of urban population to health facilities in southwestern Nigeria: the case study of Ilesa. Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci. 4(2):425–57

10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.004

126. Nguyen A-T, Tran Q-B, Tran D-Q, Reiter S. 2011. An investigation on climate responsive design strategies of vernacular housing in Vietnam. Build. Environ. 46(10):2088–106

127. Dili AS, Naseer MA, Zacharia Varghese T. 2010. Passive control methods of Kerala traditional architecture for a comfortable indoor environment: comparative investigation during various periods of rainy season. Build. Environ. 45(10):2218–30

128. Pachauri S, Brew-Hammond A, Barnes D, Bouille D, Gitonga S, et al. 2012. Energy access for development. See Ref. 69, pp. 1401–58

129. Ahmad S, Baiocchi G, Creutzig F. 2015. CO2emissions from direct energy use of urban households in India. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49(19):11312–20

130. Cuenot F, Fulton L, Staub J. 2010. The prospect for modal shifts in passenger transport worldwide and impacts on energy use and CO2. Energy Policy 41:98–106

131. Figueroa MJ, Fulton L, Tiwari G. 2013. Avoiding, transforming, transitioning: pathways to sustainable low carbon passenger transport in developing countries. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 5(2):184–90

132. Bongardt D, Breithaupt M, Creutzig F. 2010. Beyond the fossil city: towards low carbon transport and green growth. Presented at Fifth Reg. Environ. Sustain. Transp. Forum Asia, Bangkok, Aug. 23–25

10.4324/9780203071229

10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.11.020

135. Satterthwaite D, McGranahan G, Tacoli C. 2010. Urbanization and its implications for food and farming. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 365(1554):2809–20

136. Strzepek K, Boehlert B. 2010. Competition for water for the food system. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 365(1554):2927–40

137. Cervero RB. 2013. Linking urban transport and land use in developing countries. J. Transp. Land Use 6(1):7–24

Creutzig F, 2011, Low Carbon Transport in Asia

10.4324/9781315857152

140. O'Rourke D, Connolly S. 2003. Just oil? The distribution of environmental and social impacts of oil production and consumption. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 28(1):587–617

10.2307/j.ctt7s7wm

142. Allcott H. 2011. Social norms and energy conservation. J. Public Econ. 95(9):1082–95

Bowles S., 1998, J. Econ. Lit., 36, 75

144. Kahneman D. 2003. A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Am. Psychol. 58(9):697–711

145. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–31

10.1257/jel.47.4.1029

147. Siegmeier J. 2016. Keeping Pigou on tracks: second-best combinations of carbon pricing and infrastructure provision. Work. Pap. 2/2016, 17.02.2016, Mercator Res. Inst., Glob. Commons Clim. Change, Berlin