Benigne Prostatahyperplasie: Bis zu welchem Zeitpunkt kann man konservativ behandeln?

Frank Strittmatter1
1Urologisches Zentrum Fürstenfeldbruck/Germering, Fürstenfeldbruck, Deutschland

Tóm tắt

Das benigne Prostatasyndrom (BPS) ist häufig mit einer vergrößerten Prostata und einer damit verbundenen Auslassobstruktion vergesellschaftet und führt zu Symptomen des unteren Harntraktes („lower urinary tract symptoms“, LUTS). Es handelt sich aufgrund seiner Häufigkeit um eine Volkskrankheit von großer Relevanz. In den letzten Jahren hat die Möglichkeit der medikamentösen Therapie die Häufigkeit der operativen Intervention stark beeinflusst. Trotz zahlreicher nationaler und internationaler Leitlinienempfehlungen zur Behandlung von Patienten mit BPH ist die Frage: „Bis wann kann ich konservativ bleiben?“ nicht ausreichend geklärt.

Tài liệu tham khảo

McConnell JD et al (2003) The long-term effect of doxazosin, finasteride, and combination therapy on the clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med 349(25):2387–2398 Roehrborn CG (2008) BPH progression: concept and key learning from MTOPS, ALTESS, COMBAT, and ALF-ONE. BJU Int 101(Suppl 3):17–21 Sebastianelli A, Gacci M (2018) Current status of the relationship between metabolic syndrome and lower urinary tract symptoms. Eur Urol Focus 4(1):25–27 Berges R (2008) Epidemiology of benign prostatic syndrome. Associated risks and management data in German men over age 50. Urologe A 47(2):141–148 Chapple CR, Roehrborn CG (2006) A shifted paradigm for the further understanding, evaluation, and treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men: focus on the bladder. Eur Urol 49(4):651–658 Isaacs JT (1994) Etiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol 25(Suppl 1):6–9 Gratzke C et al (2015) EAU guidelines on the assessment of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol 67(6):1099–1109 Bach T, Heitz M, Bruns T (2020) Benign prostatic hyperplasia : new and treatment-relevant aspects from the DGU guidelines. Urologe A 59(5):544–549 Strittmatter F et al (2013) Current pharmacological treatment options for male lower urinary tract symptoms. Expert Opin Pharmacother 14(8):1043–1054 Michel MC, Goepel M (2001) Lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction—what’s the long-term effectiveness of medical therapies? Eur Urol 39(Suppl 3):20–25 Cindolo L et al (2015) Drug adherence and clinical outcomes for patients under pharmacological therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia: population-based cohort study. Eur Urol 68(3):418–425 Rosen R et al (2003) Lower urinary tract symptoms and male sexual dysfunction: the multinational survey of the aging male (MSAM-7). Eur Urol 44(6):637–649 D’Agate S et al (2020) Model-based meta-analysis of individual International Prostate Symptom Score trajectories in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia with moderate or severe symptoms. Br J Clin Pharmacol 86(8):1585–1599 Izard J, Nickel JC (2011) Impact of medical therapy on transurethral resection of the prostate: two decades of change. BJU Int 108(1):89–93 Presicce F, De Nunzio C, Tubaro A (2018) Clinical implications for the early treatment of benign prostatic enlargement (BPE): a systematic review. Curr Urol Rep 19(9):70 Presicce F et al (2017) The influence of the medical treatment of LUTS on benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery: do we operate too late? Minerva Urol Nefrol 69(3):242–252 Presicce F, De Nunzio C, Tubaro A (2017) Can long-term LUTS/BPH pharmacological treatment alter the outcomes of surgical intervention? Curr Urol Rep 18(9):72 Reynard JM, Shearer RJ (1999) Failure to void after transurethral resection of the prostate and mode of presentation. Urology 53(2):336–339 Djavan B et al (1997) Urodynamic assessment of patients with acute urinary retention: is treatment failure after prostatectomy predictable? J Urol 158(5):1829–1833 Blatt AH et al (2012) Transurethral prostate resection in patients with hypocontractile detrusor – what is the preditctive value of ultrastructural detrusor changes? J Urol 188(6):2294–2299