Benefit Distribution and Equity in Ecuador's Socio Bosque Program
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Angelsen A., 2012, Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices
Angelsen A., 2008, Moving ahead with REDD: Issues, options and implications, 11
Bertzky M., 2010, Carbon, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Exploring co-benefits—Ecuador
Bucheli F. J., 2010, Ecuador—Land tenure and natural disasters
Chíu M., 2011, National programme document Ecuador
Coral A., 2011, Metodología de Monitoreo para las Áreas Bajo Conservación de Socio Bosque
Costenbader J., 2009, Legal frameworks for REDD
Dobson A., 1998, Justice and the environment: Conceptions of environmental sustainability and dimensions of social justice, 10.1093/0198294956.001.0001
Garzón B. R., 2009, REDD en Territorios Indígenas de la Cuenca Amazonica. Seran los pueblos indígenas los directos beneficiarios?
INEC . 2010a . Ecuador en Cifras—Extensión Territorial. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos. http://www.ecuadorencifras.com/cifras-inec/extension.html#tpi=281
INEC . 2010b . Ecuador en Cifras—Densidad. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos. http://www.ecuadorencifras.com/cifras-inec/extension.html#tpi=282
INEC . 2010c . Ecuador en Cifras—Pobreza Necesidades Básicas Insatisfechas. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos. http://www.ecuadorencifras.com/cifras-inec/pobrezaNbi.html
2009, Tropical forest tenure assessment. Trends, challenges and opportunities
Konow J., 2003, J. Econ. Literature, 52
Leimona B., 2009, Can rewards for environmental services benefit the poor? Lessons from Asia, 3
Luttrell C., 2012, Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices, 129
Martinez-Alier J., 2002, A report for UNRISD, 1
2005, Ecosystems and human well-being: Biodiversity synthesis
2008, Acuerdo N°177
2012, Manual operativo unificado del Proyecto Socio Bosque
2010, El dilemma de los bosques en el Ecuador
Peskett , L. 2011 .Benefit sharing in REDD+: Exploring the implications for poor and vulnerable people. Washington, DC: World Bank and REDD-net. http://redd-net.org/files/BenefitSharingReport.pdf (accessed 16 May 2012).
Peskett , L. , and G. Brodnig . 2011 .Carbon rights in REDD+. Exploring the implications for poor and vulnerable people. Washington, DC: World Bank and REDD-net. http://redd-net.org/files/CarbonRightsReport.pdf (accessed 16 May 2012).
Proctor , W. , T. Köllner , and A. Lukasiewicz . 2008 .Equity considerations and payments for ecosystem services. Environmental Economy and Policy Research—Discussion Paper Series. Cambridge: University of Cambridge. http://www.landecon.cam.ac.uk/RePEc/pdf/200831.pdf (accessed 15 May 2012).
2011, Resultados globales 2011
2008, Constitución de 2008
Rosa H., 2004, Compensation for environmental services and rural communities: Lessons from the Americas
Scherr S., 2004, For services rendered—The current status and future potential of markets for the ecosystem services provided by tropical forests
Schokkaert , E. 1998 . Mr. Fairmind is post-welfarist: Opinions on distributive justice. Catholic University of Leuven, Department of Economics, Discussion paper series (98.09). Leuven, Belgium.
2009, Plan Nacional del Desarollo
Stern , M. , and B. S. Kernan . 2011 .Report on biodiversity and tropical forests in Ecuador. U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). http://transition.usaid.gov/locations/latin_america_caribbean/environment/docs/section_118/Ecuador_May_2011.pdf (accessed 16 April 2012).
ARD T. T., 2012, Forest Carbon, Markets and Communities (FCMC) program. Key findings and opportunities for REDD+ in Ecuador
Vatn , A. , D. N. Barton , H. Lindhjem , S. Movik , I. Ring , and R. Santos . 2011 .Can markets protect biodiversity? An evaluation of different financial mechanisms. NORAGRIC Report No. 60. Aas, Norway: Department of International Environment and Development Studies, Noragric, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB) .