Benchmarking of North Indian urban water utilities

Benchmarking - Tập 18 Số 1 - Trang 86-106 - 2011
Mamata R.Singh1, Atul K.Mittal1, V.Upadhyay2
1Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India
2Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi-, India

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to develop a suitable benchmarking framework that encompasses multiple criteria of sustainable water supply services for assessing the performance of select North Indian urban water utilities and also to arrive at potential for input reductions (or efficient input levels).Design/methodology/approachThe study considers 35 North Indian urban water utilities pertaining to two union territories (Chandigarh and Delhi) and three states (Haryana, Punjab and Uttar Pradesh) for sustainability‐based performance assessment using input‐oriented variable returns to scale data envelopment analysis (DEA) model. Important criteria considered for sustainable water supply services are service sufficiency, service reliability, resource conservation, staff rationalization, and business viability which in turn address the key sustainability dimensions (social, environmental and financial).FindingsThe approach when applied to a sample of 35 North Indian urban water utilities shows low‐performance levels for most of the utilities, with significant scope for reduction in operation and maintenance expenditure, staff size and water losses. State/UT‐wise analysis of sustainability‐based average efficiency presents the highest score for Chandigarh and the least score for Haryana, whereas the rest of the three states/UT score in between them.Research limitations/implicationsLimited data availability has constrained the incorporation of other sustainability criteria (such as services to the poor, tariff design, customer services, revenue functions, etc.) for efficiency analysis of urban water utilities. Also, estimation of efficiency scores does not encompass the effect of exogenous environmental factors which are beyond utilities' managerial control (such as topography, population density, water source, ownership status, etc.).Practical implicationsThis framework would be useful for the regulator or operator of the facility to rank the utilities and devise performance‐linked incentive mechanism or price cap regulation.Originality/valueThis paper is a significant departure from the other international benchmarking initiatives/studies as it develops a holistic framework for benchmarking in the water sector that encompasses multiple criteria of sustainable water supply services using DEA as a tool.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Aida, K., William, W.C., Jesús, T.P. and Toshiyuki, S. (1998), “Evaluating water supply services in Japan with RAM: a range‐adjusted measure of inefficiency”, Omega, International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 207‐32.

Akosa, G., Franceys, R., Barker, P. and Jones, T.W. (1995), “Efficiency of water supply and sanitation projects in Ghana”, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 56‐65.

Alsharif, K., Feroz, E.H., Klemer, A. and Raab, R. (2008), “Governance of water supply systems in the Palestinian Territories: a data envelopment analysis approach to the management of water resources”, Journal of Environment Management, Vol. 87 No. 1, pp. 80‐94.

Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1984), “Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis”, Management Science, Vol. 30 No. 9, pp. 1078‐92.

Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Swarts, J. and Thomas, D.A. (1989), “An introduction to data envelopment analysis with some of its models and their uses”, Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting, Vol. 5, pp. 125‐63.

Berg, S.V. (2006), “Survey of benchmarking methodologies: executive summary”, working paper, World Bank, Public Utility Research Centre, Washington, DC, available at: www.purc.org.

Berg, S.V. and Lin, C. (2007), “Consistency in performance rankings: the Peru water sector”, Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. 40 No. 6, pp. 93‐805.

Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. (1978), “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 2 No. 6, pp. 429‐44.

Coelli, T., Rao, D.S.P. and Battese, G.E. (1998), An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Kluwer, London.

Coelli, T.J., Estache, A., Perelman, S. and Trujillo, L. (2003), A Primer on Efficiency Measurement for Utilities and Transport Regulators, The World Bank, Washington, DC.

Jamasb, T. and Pollitt, M. (2001), “Benchmarking and regulation: international electricity experience”, Utilities Policy, Vol. 9, pp. 107‐30.

Johanesburg Summit (2002), “Johanesburg Summit – Secretary General calls for global action on water issues”, available at: www.johanesburgsummit.org/html/media_info/pressrelease_prep2/global_action_water_2103.pdf (accessed 2002).

Kaaya, J.A. (1999), “Experience of autonomous water and sewerage authorities in Tanzania”, Proc. 25th WEDC Conference, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 30 August‐3 September.

Kapadia, K. (2005), “Sustainable water supply in urban development: case studies of Gurgaon, Dwarka and Greater Noida”, Journal of Indian Buildings Congress (IBC), Vol. 12 No. 1.

Kulshrestha, M. (2005), “Performance assessment and efficiency evaluation for the urban water operations of Indian utilities”, PhD thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi.

Lambert, D., Dichev, D. and Raffiee, K. (1993), “Ownership and sources of inefficiency in provision of water services”, Water Resources Research, Vol. 29, pp. 1573‐8.

Lin, C. (2005), “Incorporating service quality & prospects of benchmarking: evidence from the Peru water sector”, Utilities Policy, Vol. 13, pp. 230‐9.

Mugisha, S. (2007), “Effects of incentive applications on technical efficiencies: empirical evidence from Ugandan water utilities”, Utilities Policy, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 225‐33.

NIUA Report (2005), “Status of water supply, sanitation and solid waste management in urban areas for year 1999”, Main Report & Statistical Volume I (Water Supply & Water Tariff), MoUD, Government of India, New Delhi.

Patwardhan, S.S. (1993), “Financing urban water supply scheme”, Journal of IWWA, October‐December.

Raghupathi, P.U. and Foster, V. (2002), “A scorecard for India : Paper 2”, Water Tariff & Subsidies in South Asia, December.

Renzetti, S. and Dupont, D. (2007), “Measuring the technical efficiency of municipal water suppliers: the role of environmental factors”, Journal of Land Economics, Vol. 85 No. 4, pp. 627‐36.

Singh, M.R., Upadhyay, V. and Mittal, A.K. (2005), “Urban water tariff structure & cost recovery opportunities in India”, Water Science and Technology, Vol. 52 No. 12, pp. 43‐51.

Thanassoulis, E. (2000), “The use of data envelopment analysis in the regulation of UK water utilities: water distribution”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 126, pp. 436‐53.

Tupper, H.C. and Resende, M. (2004), “Efficiency and regulatory issues in the Brazilian water and sewage sector: an empirical study”, Utilities Policy, Vol. 12, pp. 29‐40.

Tynan, N. and Kingdom, B. (2002), “A water scorecard: setting performance targets for water utilities”, Public Policy for the Private Sector, Group Private Sector and Infrastructure Network, Public Policy Journal, Note No. 242, The World Bank, Washington, DC.

Yepes, G. and Dianderas, A. (1996), Indicators, Water and Waste Water Utilities, 2nd ed., Water and Sanitation Division of the Transportation, Water and Urban Development Department, TWUWS, The World Bank, Washington, DC (published informally by International Bank of Reconstruction and Development).

Zeleny, M. (1982), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Benchmarking

Tập 18 Số 1

86-106

Thông tin tác giả