Benchmarking in wastewater treatment plants: a tool to save operational costs
Tóm tắt
The economics of wastewater management and treatment is the subject of growing interest by water agencies and wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) operators. Benchmarking procedures are useful tools to assess the performance of these facilities and help identify best practices. To estimate the efficiency scores for each input involved in the operation of WWTPs, a non-radial data envelopment analysis model has been applied to a sample of Spanish WWTPs. The great advantage of this methodology is that it enables the identification of cost items on which to act to increase the efficiency at plant level. In the second stage, variables influencing efficiency scores have been identified. This analysis helps improve the understanding of how individual scores of efficiency and operating variables are related. It is shown that some factors do not affect all cost items—thus illustrating that an increase in global efficiency would not produce a reduction in all cost items. The benchmarking methodology and empirical application developed in this article could be very useful for improving the management of WWTPs and contribute to save operational costs.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abbaspour M, Hosseinzadeh Lofti F, Kasbassi AR, Roayaei E, Nikomeram H (2010) Development of a model to assess environmental performance, concerning HSE-MS principles. Environ Monit Assess 165(1–4):517–528
Abbott M, Cohen B, Wang WC (2012) The performance of the urban water and wastewater sectors in Australia. Util Policy 20(1):52–63
Andrews M, Berardo P, Foster D (2011) The sustainable industrial water cycle—a review of the economics approach. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 11(1):67–77
Avkiran NC, Tone K, Tsutsui M (2008) Bridging radial and non-radial measures of efficiency in DEA. Ann Oper Res 164(1):127–138
Banker RD, Chang H, Cooper WW (2003) A simulation study of DEA and parametric frontier models in the presence of heteroscedasticity. Eur J Oper Res 153(3):624–640
Benedetti L, Dirckx G, Bixio D, Thoeve C, Vanrolleghem PA (2008) Environmental and economic performance assessment of the integrated urban wastewater system. J Environ Manag 88(4):1262–1272
Berg S (2010) Water utility benchmarking. Measurement, methodologies and performance incentives. International Water Association, New York
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444
Charnes A, Cooper WW (1990) Data envelopment analysis. In: Breadley HE (ed) Operational research ’90. Pergamon Press, Oxford
Cheremisinoff NP (2002) Handbook of water and wastewater treatment technologies. Butterworth–Heinemann, Woburn
Coelli T, Rao DS, Battese GE (1998) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Kluwer Academic, Boston
Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2006) Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses. Springer, New York
Corton ML, Berg S (2008) Benchmarking Central American Water Utilities. Research papers 08–21, Public Utility Research Center (PURC), University of Florida, Gainesville
Deyneli F (2012) Analysis of relationship between efficiency of justice services and salaries of judges with two stage DEA method. Eur J Law Econ (in press)
Dogot T, Xanthoulis Y, Fonder N, Xanthoulis D (2010) Estimating the costs of collective treatment of wastewater: the case of Walloon Region (Belgium). Water Sci Technol 62(3):640–648
Eurostat (2012) Environmental protection expenditure. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Environmental_protection_expenditure. Accessed 15 Nov 2012
Färe R, Lovell CAK (1978) Measuring the technical efficiency of production. J Econ Theory 19(1):150–162
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK (1985) Measuring of efficiency of production. Kluwer–Nijhoff, Boston
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK (1994) Production frontiers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc Assoc 120:253–281
Ferro G, Romero CA (2011) Setting performance standards for regulation of water services: benchmarking latin American utilities. Water Policy 13(5):607–623
Fraquelli G, Giandrone R (2003) Reforming the wastewater treatment sector in Italy: implications of plant size, structure and scale economies. Water Resour Res 39(10):1293–1300
Gill ZM, Tierney MJ, Pegs IM, Allan N (2011) Measured energy and water performance of an aspiring low energy/carbon affordable housing site in the UK. Energy Build 43(1):117–125
Grosskopf S (1996) Statistical inference and nonparametric efficiency: a selective survey. J Prod Anal 7:161–176
Hernández F, Sala R (2009) Technical efficiency and cost analysis in wastewater treatment processes: a DEA approach. Desalination 249(1):230–234
Hernández-Sancho F, Molinos-Senante M, Sala-Garrido R (2012a) Techno-economical efficiency and productivity change of wastewater treatment plants: the role of internal and external factors. J Environ Monit 13:3448–3459
Hernández-Sancho F, Molinos-Senante M, Sala-Garrido R (2012b) Energy efficiency in Spanish wastewater treatment plants: a non-radial DEA approach. Sci Total Environ 409:2693–2699
Hsiao CK, Yang CC (2007) Performance measurement in wastewater control? Pig farms in Taiwan. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 103:467–474
Hsiao B, Chern CC, Chiu CR (2011) Performance evaluation with the entropy-based weighted Russell measure in data. Expert Syst Appl 38(8):9965–9972
Hwang SN, Kao TL (2008) Using two-stage DEA to measure managerial efficiency change of non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. Int J Manag Decis Mak 9(4):377–401
IBNET (The International Benchmarking Network for Water and Sanitation Utilities) 2012. http://www.ib-net.org/. Accessed 15 Nov 2012
Koopmans T (1951) An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In: Koopmans TC (ed) Activity analysis of production and allocation. Cowles commission for research in economics, monograph No. 13. Willey, Berlin
Lin C (2005) Service quality and prospects for benchmarking: evidence from Peru water sector. Util Policy 13(3):230–239
Lofrano G, Brown J (2010) Wastewater management through the ages: a history of mankind. Sci Total Environ 408:5254–5264
Lozano S, Iribarren D, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2009) The link between operational efficiency and environmental impacts. A joint application of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis. Sci Total Environ 407(5):1744–1754
Lozano S, Adenso-Díaz B, Barba-Gutierrez Y (2011) Rusell non-radial eco-efficiency measure and scale elasticity of a simple of electric/electronic products. J Frankl Inst 348(7):1605–1614
Marques RC (2008) Measuring the total factor productivity of the Portuguese water and sewerage services. Econ Apl 12(2):215–237
Molinos-Senante M, Hernández-Sancho F, Sala-Garrido R (2010) Economic feasibility study for wastewater treatment: a cost-benefit analysis. Sci Total Environ 408:4396–4402
Morais P, Camanho AS (2011) Evaluation of performance of European cities with the aim to promote quality of life improvements. Omega 39(4):398–409
Parena R, Smeets E, Troquet I (2002) Process benchmarking in the water industry. International Water Association, London
Picazo-Tadeo AJ, Sáez-Fernández FJ, González-Gómez F (2009) The role of environmental factors in water utilities′ technical efficiency. Empirical evidence from Spanish companies. Appl Econ 41(5):615–628
Quadros S, Rosa MJ, Alegre H, Silva C (2010) A performance indicator system for urban wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci Technol 62(10):2398–2407
Ruxton GD, Beauchamp G (2008) Some suggestions about use of the Kruskal–Wallis test. Anim Behav 76(3):1083–1087
Sala-Garrido R, Molinos-Senante M, Hernández-Sancho F (2011) Comparing the efficiency of wastewater treatment technologies through a DEA metafrontier model. Chem Eng J 173:766–772
Sala-Garrido R, Molinos-Senante M, Hernández-Sancho F (2012) How does seasonality affect water reuse possibilities? An efficiency and cost analysis. Resour Conserv Recycl 58:125–131
Salas JJ, Aragón CA, Real A, Ortega E, Ferrer Y (2011) Analysis and description of sustainable solutions for wastewater treatment in small communities. Water Practice and Technology 6(1)
Shao BBM, Lin WT (2002) Technical efficiency analysis of information technology investments: a two-stage empirical investigation. Inf Manag 39(5):391–401
Simar L, Wilson PW (2011) Two-stage DEA: caveat emptor. J Prod Anal 36(2):205–218
Spurrier JD (2003) On the null distribution of the Kruskal–Wallis statistics. J Nonparametr Stat 15(6):685–691
Sueyoshi T, Goto M (2011) DEA approach for unified efficiency measurement: assessment of Japanese fossil fuel power generation. Energy Econ 33(2):292–303
Tsagarakis KP, Mara DD, Angelakis AN (2003) Application of cost criteria for selection of municipal wastewater treatment systems. Water Air Soil Pollut 142(1):187–210
WHO-UNICEF (World Health Organization-The United Nations Children's Fund) (2010) Progress sanitation and drinking-water 2010 update. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/. Accessed 15 Nov 2012
Zessner M, Lampert C, Kroiss H, Lindtner S (2010) Cost comparison of wastewater treatment in Danubian countries. Water Sci Technol 62(2):223–230
Zhao ZB, An S, Ma F (2010) Efficiency of wastewater treatment in northeast cities of China. J Harbin Inst Technol 42(4):588–591