Benchmark problems for optimal shape design for 2D eddy currents

COMPEL - The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering - Tập 17 Số 4 - Trang 448-459 - 1998
JacekStarzynski1, StanislawWincenciak1
1Warsaw University of Technology IETiME, Warsaw, Poland

Tóm tắt

Two new benchmark inverse problems for eddy currents are proposed. The first originates in the optimal design of the tubular inductive heater. The authors’ goal is to offer a simple problem which will check whether new software is able to minimize a multimodal objective function. The second benchmark is a simplified model of a hardening device. The purpose of this problem is to test the ability of the software to deal with different design parameters. This benchmark can be easily extended for more complicated, coupled fields problems. For both benchmarks reference standard solutions are presented. They were obtained using a finite element package for electromagnetics, developed by the authors.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alotto, P.et al. (1996), “Some results on a SMES device optimization benchmark problem”, inThe 4th International Workshop on Optimization and Inverse Problems in Electromagnetics, Brno, Czech Republic, 19‐21 June, p. 54.

Borghi, C.A. and Fabbri, M. (1996), “A benchmark problem for the optimal design of the poloidal coils of a fusion experiment toroidal device”, in The 4th International Workshop on Optimization and Inverse Problems in Electromagnetics, Brno, Czech Republic, 19‐21 June, p. 54.

Borghi, C.A. et al. (1996), “A comparative study of Loney’s solenoid by different techniques of global optimization”, inThe 4th International Workshop on Optimization and Inverse Problems in Electromagnetics, Brno, Czech Republic, 19‐21 June, p. 54.

Di Barba, P. and Savini, A. (1996), “Optimal shape design of an iron‐cored electromagnet: a further benchmark in magnetostatics”, in The 4th International Workshop on Optimization and Inverse Problems in Electromagnetics, Brno, Czech Republic, 19‐21 June, p. 54.

du Terrail, Y. et al. (1984), “Nonlinear complex finite element analysis of electromagnetic field in steady‐state AC devices”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG‐20(4), July, pp. 549‐52.

Gill, P.E., Murray, W. and Wright, H. (19982), Practical Optimization, Academic Press, London.

Korytkowski, J.et al. (1992), “Solving inverse problems with the aid of field analysis and synthesis translator”, in5th International IGTE Symposium on Numerical Field Calculation in Electrical Engineering, Proceedings, IGTE, Technische Universität, Graz, Austria, pp. 267‐72.

Luomi, J. et al. (1986), “On the use of effective reluctivities in magnetic field analysis of induction motors fed from sinusoidal voltage source”, in Proceedings of ICEM ’86, pp. 706‐09.

Minnich, S.H. et al. (1984), “Comparison of two methods for modeling large‐signal alternating magnetic fields using finite elements”, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS‐103(10), October, pp. 2953‐9.

Niedbala, R. (1986), “A method of choice of the tubular inductive heaters parameters”, Prace Naukowe Politechniki Warszawskiej, Elektryka, Vol. 79, pp. 79‐91.

Salon, S.J. (1995), Finite Element Analysis of Electrical Machines, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam.

Starzynski, J. (1996), “Optimal shape design for 2D steady‐state eddy currents”, PhD dissertation, IETiME Politechniki Warszawskiej, ul. Koszykowa 75, 00‐662 Warszawa, Poland, WWW: http://www.iem.pw.du.pl/∼jstar/phd.html, 1996.

Wincenciak, S. (1990), Optimal Shape Design based on Numerical Models of Electromagnetic Fields, Metody projektowania ksztaltu obszaru z wykorzystaniem modeli numerycznych pola elektromagnetycznego, Wydawnictwa Politechniki Warszawskiej, ul. Nowowiejska 24, 00‐665 Warszawa, Poland.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

COMPEL - The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Tập 17 Số 4

448-459

Thông tin tác giả