Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Niềm tin, Thực hành và Phản ánh: Khám Phá Đánh Giá Lớp Học Của Một Giáo Viên Khoa Học Qua Mô Hình Tam Giác Đánh Giá
Tóm tắt
Bài báo này mô tả Khung Thực Hành Đánh Giá và cách tôi sử dụng nó để nghiên cứu một giáo viên Hóa học tại trường trung học khi cô ấy thiết kế, thực hiện và học hỏi từ một báo cáo thí nghiệm Hóa học. Khung này bao gồm việc khám phá ba thành phần tập trung vào giáo viên trong đánh giá lớp học (niềm tin đánh giá, thực hành và phản ánh) và phân tích các thành phần này bằng mô hình tam giác đánh giá (Pellegrino et al. trong, Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. National Academy Press, Washington DC, 2001). Bằng cách sử dụng khung này, tôi báo cáo các thực hành đánh giá của giáo viên, báo cáo sự phù hợp trong các thực hành đánh giá của cô ấy thông qua ba đỉnh của tam giác đánh giá (nhận thức, quan sát và diễn giải), và đề xuất các mối quan hệ giữa niềm tin và thực hành của cô ấy. Tôi kết luận bằng cách thảo luận về sự đóng góp và những hạn chế của Khung Thực Hành Đánh Giá trong khi thực hiện các nghiên cứu trong tương lai và hỗ trợ các giáo viên khoa học trong việc đánh giá việc học của học sinh.
Từ khóa
#đánh giá #giáo viên #thực hành #niềm tin #phản ánh #tâm lý học giáo dụcTài liệu tham khảo
Abrams, L. M., Pedulla, J. J., & Madaus, G. F. (2003). Views from the classroom: Teachers’ opinions of statewide testing programs. Theory into Practice, 42, 18–29.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Washington, DC: Author.
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 9–21.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139–148.
Cizek, G. J., Fitzgerald, S. M., & Rachor, R. A. (1995). Teachers’ assessment practices: Preparation, isolation, and the kitchen sink. Educational Assessment, 3, 159–179.
Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Relationship between teacher beliefs and science education reform. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 7, 247–266.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Assessing teacher education: The usefulness of multiple measures for assessing program outcomes. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 120–138.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Scott, P., & Mortimer, E. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5–12.
Duschl, R. A., & Gitomer, D. H. (1997). Strategies and challenges to changing the focus of assessment and instruction in science classrooms. Educational Assessment, 4, 37–73.
Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38, 47–65.
Gearhart, M., Nagashima, S., Pfotenhauer, J., Clark, S., Schwab, C., & Vendlinski, T. et al. (2006). Developing expertise with classroom assessment in K-12 Science: Learning to interpret student work. Interim findings from a 2-year study. Educational Assessment, 11(3–4), 237–263.
Gitomer, D. H., & Duschl, R. A. (1998). Emerging issues and practices in science assessment. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 791–810). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Hashweh, M. Z. (1996). Effects of science teachers’ epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 47–63.
Jones, M. G., & Carter, G. (2007). Science teacher attitudes and beliefs. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1067–1104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Klassen, S. (2006). Contextual assessment in science education: Background, issues, and policy. Science & Education, 90, 820–851.
Lee, O. (2004). Teacher change in beliefs and practices in science and literacy instruction with English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 65–93.
Luykx, A., & Lee, O. (2007). Measuring instructional congruence in elementary science classrooms: Pedagogical and methodological components of a theoretical framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 424–447.
Martiniello, M. (2008). Language and the performance of English-language learners in math word problems. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 333–368.
Millar, R., & Osborne, J. F. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London, England: King’s College London.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Orpwood, G. (2001). The role of assessment in science curriculum reform. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 8, 135–151.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.
Pedulla, J. J., Abrams, L. M., Madaus, G. F., Russell, M. K., Ramos, M. A., et al. (2003). Perceived effects of state-mandated testing programs on teaching and learning: Findings from a national survey of teachers. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy.
Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). The nature of assessment and reasoning from evidence. In J. W. Pellegrino, N. Chudowsky, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment (pp. 37–54). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Remesal, A. (2011). Primary and secondary teachers’ conceptions of assessment: A qualitative study. Teaching and teacher education, 27, 472–482.
Resnick, L. B., & Resnick, D. P. (1992). Assessing the thinking curriculum: New tools for educational reform. In B. R. Gifford & M. C. O’Connor (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement, and instruction (pp. 37–75). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). Rhetoric and reality in science performance assessments: An update. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 1045–1063.
Shaver, A., Cuevas, P., Lee, O., & Avalos, M. (2007). Teachers’ perceptions of policy influences on science instruction with culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 725–746.
Shaw, J. M. (1997). Threats to the validity of science performance assessments for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 721–743.
Shaw, J. M. (2005). Getting things right at the classroom level. In J. L. Herman & E. Haertel (Eds.), Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement. The 104th yearbook of the national academy society for the study of education, part 2 (pp. 340–357). Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.
Solano-Flores, G., & Nelson-Barber, S. (2001). On the cultural validity of science assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 553–573.
Stoddart, T., Pinal, A., Latzke, M., & Canaday, D. (2002). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 664–687.
Tobin, K., Tippins, D. J., & Gallard, A. J. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 45–93). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Treagust, D. F., Jacobowitz, R., Gallagher, J. L., & Parker, J. (2001). Using assessment as a guide in teaching for understanding: A case study of a middle school science class learning about sound. Science & Education, 85, 137–157.
Webb, N. M. (1995). Group collaboration in assessment: Multiple objectives, processes, and outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17, 239–261.
Webb, N. L. (1997). Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education. Council of chief state school officers and National institute for science education research monograph no. 6. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 3–118.
Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Wilson, M., & Sloane, K. (2000). From principles to practice: An embedded assessment system. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 181–208.
Yin, Y., Shavelson, R. J., Ayala, C. C., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Brandon, P. R., Furtak, E. M., et al. (2008). On the impact of formative assessment on student motivation, achievement, and conceptual change. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 335–359.
Yung, B. H. W. (2006). Assessment reform in science: Fairness and fear. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.