Behavioural Economics in Unfair Contract Terms

Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500. Ayres, I., & Gertner, R. (1999). Majoritarian vs. minoritarian defaults. Stanford Law Review, 51(6), 1591–1614. Baker, L. A., & Emery, R. E. (1993). When every relationship is above average: perceptions and expectations of divorce at the time of marriage. Law and Human Behaviour, 17, 439–450. Bakos, Y., Marotta-Wurgler, F., & Trossen, D. R. (2009). Does anyone read the fine print? Testing a law and economics approach to standard form contracts. SSRN E-Library, available at: http://ssrn.com/paper=1443256. Bar-Gill, O. (2008). Behavioural economics of consumer contracts, the exchange. Minnesota Law Review, 92(3), 749–802. Bar-Gill, O. (2007). Informing consumers about themselves. SSRN E-Library, New York University Law and Economics working papers, paper 111 available at http://ssrn.com/paper=1056381. Becher, S. I., & Zarsky, T. Z. (2008). E-contract doctrine 2.0: standard form contracting in the age of online user participation. Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, 14(2), 303–366. Ben-Shahar, O. (2009). The myth of the “opportunity to read” in contract law. European Review of Contract Law, 5(1), 1–28. Brennan, T. (2005). Consumer preference not to choose: methodological and policy implications, SSRN E-Library: Resources for the Future Discussion paper 05-51, available at http://ssrn.com/paper=854424. Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44. Collins, H. (2004). The freedom to circulate documents: regulating contracts in Europe. European Law Journal, 10(6), 787–803. Cooter, R., & Ulen, T. S. (2004). Law and economics. Austin: Addison Wesley. De Geest, G. (2002). The signing-without- reading problem: An analysis of the European Directive on unfair contract terms. In H. B. Schäfer & H. J. Lwowski (Eds.), Konsequenzen wirtschaftsrechtlicher Normen Festschrift für Klaus Ott (pp. 213–235). Wiesbaden: Gabler. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers. Edwards, M. (2008). The FTC and new paternalism. Administrative Law Review, 60(2), 323–370. Eigen, Z. J. (2009).Towards a behavioral theory of contract: Experimental evidence of consent, compliance, promise and performance. SSRN eLibrary; CELS 2009 4th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper, 2009. Available at: http://ssrn.com/paper=1443549. Eisenberg, M. A. (1985). Taxed anxiety. Southern California Law Review, 59(2), 305–311. Epstein, R. A. (2006). Behavioural economics: human errors and market corrections. University of Chicago Law Review, 73(1), 111–132. Epstein, R. A. (2008). The neo-classical economics of consumer contracts. Minnesota Law Review, 92(3), 803–835. Faure, M. G. (2009). The impact of behavioural law and economics on accident law. Inaugural lectures, Erasmus School of Law, 12 June 2009. The Hague: Boom Juridische uitgevers. Gigerenzer, G. (2005). Is the mind irrational or ecological rational? In F. Parisi & V. L. Smith (Eds.), The law and economics of irrational behaviour (pp. 37–67). Stanford: Stanford University Press. Gillette, C. P. (2005). Pre-approved contract for internet commerce. Houston Law Review, 42(4), 975–1013. Glaeser, E. L. (2006). Paternalism and psychology. University of Chicago Law Review, 73, 133–156. Grether, D. M., Schwartz, A., & Wilde, L. (1985). The irrelevance of information overload: an analysis of search and disclosure. Southern California Law Review, 59(2), 277–304. Grundmann, S. (2002). Information, party autonomy and economic agents in European contract law. Common Market Law Review, 39(2), 269–293. Hadfield, G. K., Howse, R., & Trebilcock, M. J. (1998). Information-based principles for rethinking consumer protection policy. Journal of Consumer Policy, 21(2), 131–169. Hanson, J. D., & Kysar, D. A. (1999). Taking behaviouralism seriously: the problem of market manipulation. New York University Law Review, 74(3), 630–749. Hartlief, T. (2004). Freedom and protection in contemporary contract law. Journal of Consumer Policy, 27(3), 253–267. Hatzis, A. N. (2008). An offer you can’t negotiate: Some thoughts on the economics of standard form consumer contracts. In H. Collins (Ed.), Standard contract terms in Europe: A basis for and a challenge to European contract law (pp. 43–56). Alphen a/d Rijn: Kluwer Law International. Hillman, R. A. (2006). Online consumer standard-form contracting practices: A survey and discussion of legal implications. In J. K. Winn (Ed.), Consumer protection in the age of the ‘information economy (pp. 283–312). Aldershot: Ashgate Press. Hillman, R. A., & Rachlinski, J. J. (2002). Standard-form contracting in the electronic age. New York University Law Review, 77(2), 429–495. Howells, G. G. (2005). The potential and limits of consumer empowerment by information. Journal of Law and Society, 32(3), 349–370. Howells, G. G., & Weatherill, S. (2005). Consumer protection law. Aldershot: Ashgate. Incardona, R., & Poncibò, C. (2007). The average consumer, the unfair commercial practices directive and the cognitive revolution. Journal of Consumer Policy, 30(1), 21–38. Jacoby, J. (1984). Perspectives on information overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(4), 432–435. Jolls, C. (1998). Behavioural economic analysis of redistributive legal rules. Vanderbilt Law Review, 51, 1653–1677. Jolls, C., & Sunstein, C. R. (2006). Debiasing through law. Journal of Legal Studies, 35, 199–241. Jolls, C., Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. (1998). A behavioural approach to law and economics. Stanford Law Review, 50, 1471–1550. Katz, A. W. (1990). Your terms or mine? The duty to read the fine print in contracts. Rand Journal of Economics, 21(4), 518–537. Korobkin, R. B. (2003). Bounded rationality, standard form contracts and inconsolability. University of Chicago Law Review, 70(4), 1203–1295. Korobkin, R. B., & Ulen, T. S. (2000). Law and behavioural science: removing the rationality assumption from law and economics. California Law Review, 88, 1051–1144. Kroeber-Riel, W. (1984). Konsumentenverhalten, 3rd ed. Munich: Verlag Vahlen. Kuran, T., & Sunstein, C. R. (1999). Availability cascades and risk regulation. Stanford Law Review, 51(4), 683–768. List, J. A. (2003). Does market experience eliminate market anomalies. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 41–71. List, J. A. (2006). The behavioralist meets the market: measuring social preferences and reputation effects in actual transactions. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 1–37. Loewenstein, G. F., & Haisley, E. (2008). The economist as therapist: Methodological ramifications of “light” paternalism. In A. Caplin & E. Schotter (Eds.), Perspectives on the future of economics: Positive and normative foundations (pp. 210–245). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Luth, H. A. (2010). Behavioural economics in consumer policy. The economic analysis of standard terms in consumer contracts revisited. Dissertation, Erasmus School of Law, 2010. Antwerp: Intersentia, forthcoming. Marotta-Wurgler, F. (2007). What’s in a standard form contract? An empirical analysis of software license agreements. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4(4), 677–713. Micklitz, H. W. (2008). Some reflections on Cassis de Dijon and the control of unfair contract terms in consumer contracts. In H. Collins (Ed.), Standard contract terms in Europe: A basis for and a challenge to European contract law (pp. 19–41). Alphen a/d Rijn: Kluwer Law International. Mitchell, G. (2002). Why law and economics’ perfect rationality should not be traded for behavioural law and economics’ equal incompetence. Georgia Law Journal, 91, 67–167. Müller, W. (1970). Residential tenants and their leases: an empirical study. Michigan Law Review, 69(2), 247–298. Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behaviour. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 311–329. OECD. (2006). Roundtable on demand-side economics for consumer policy: Summary report. DSTI/CP(2006)3/FINAL. OECD: Paris. OECD. (2007). Roundtable on economics for consumer policy: Summary report. DSTI/CP(2007)1/FINAL. OECD: Paris. Ogus, A. I. (2000). Costs and cautionary tales. Economic insights for the law. Oxford: Hart Publishing. Posner, R. A. (1998). Rational choice, behavioural economics, and the law. Stanford Law Review, 50, 1551–1575. Rabin, M. (2002). A perspective on psychology and economics. European Economic Review, 46, 657–685. Rachlinski, J. J. (2000). New law and psychology: a reply to critics, sceptics, and cautious supporters. Cornell Law Review, 85(3), 739–766. Rachlinski, J. J. (2003). The uncertain psychological case for paternalism. Northwestern University Law Review, 97(2), 1165–1226. Ramsay, I. (2007). Consumer law and policy. Oxford: Hart Publishing. Richkowskiy, F., & Döring, T. (2008). Consumer policy in a market economy: considerations from the perspective of the economics of information, the new institutional economics as well as behavioural economics. Journal of Consumer Policy, 31(3), 285–313. Schäfer, H. B., & Leyens, P. (2009). Judicial control of standard terms and European private law. In P. Larouche & P. Shirico (Eds.), Economic analysis of the DCFR (pp. 99–121). Munich: Sellier. Schäfer, H. B. (2000). The bundling of similar interests in litigation, the incentives for class action and legal actions taken by associations. European Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 183–213. Schillig, M. (2008). Inequality of bargaining power versus market for lemons: legal paradime change and the Court of Justice’ jurisprudence on Directive 93/13 on unfair contract terms. European Law Review, 33(3), 336–358. Schwartz, A., & Wilde, L. (1979). Intervening in markets on the basis of imperfect information: a legal and economic analysis. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 127(3), 630–682. Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York: HarperCollins. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280–285. Solan, L. M., Rosenblatt, T., & Osherson, D. (2008). False consensus bias in contract interpretation. Columba Law Review, 108(5), 1268–1300. Sovern, J. (2006). Towards a new model of consumer protection: the problem of inflated transaction costs. William & Mary Law Review, 47(6), 1635–1709. Stark, D. P., & Choplin, J. N. (2009). A license to deceive: enforcing contractual myths despite consumer psychological realities. New York University Journal of Law & Business, 5(2), 617–744. Sunstein, C. R. (1997). Behavioural analysis of law. The University of Chicago Law Review, 64, 1175–1195. Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Human behaviour and the law of work. Virginia Law Review, 87(2), 205–276. Thaler, R. H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of economic behaviour and organisation, 1(1), 39–60. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge. Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press. Tiemeijer, W. L., Thomas, C. A., & Prast, H. M. (2009). De menselijke beslisser; over de psychologie van keuze en gedrag. WRR-verkenning 22. Amsterdam: WRR/Amsterdam University Press. Available at: http://www.wrr.nl/content.jsp?objectid=5127. Tor, A. (2008). The methodology of the behavioural analysis of law. Haifa Law Review, 4(1), 237–327. Trebilcock, M. J. (2003). Rethinking consumer protection policy. In C. E. F. Rickett & T. G. W. Telfer (Eds.), International perspectives on consumer access to justice (pp. 68–98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131. Van den Bergh, R. J. (1990). Economische analyse van het consumentenrecht. Ars Aequi, 39(10), 787–793. Van den Bergh, R. (1997). Wer schützt den europäischen Verbraucher vor dem brüsseler Verbraucherschutz? In C. Ott & H. B. Schäfer (Eds.), Effiziente Verhaltenssteuerung und Kooperation im Zivilrecht (pp. 77–102). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Van den Bergh, R. (2003). Competition law and consumer protection legislation. In A. N. Hatzis (Ed.), Economic analysis of law: A European perspective (p. 1). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Weatherill, S. (2005). EU consumer law and policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Wibisana, M. R. A. G. (2008). Law and economic analysis of the precautionary principle, (dissertation). Maastricht: Universitaire Pers Maastricht. Wilhelmsson, T. (2006). Cooperation and competition regarding standard contract terms in consumer contracts. European Business Law Review, 17(1), 51–72. Wilhelmsson, T., & Twigg-Flesner, C. (2006). Pre-contractual information duties in the acquis communautaire. European Review of Contract Law, 2(4), 441–470.