Bear ye one another’s genetic burdens: the price of diversity and complexity

Poiesis & Praxis - Tập 3 - Trang 73-82 - 2004
Michael Bölker1
1Fachbereich Biologie, Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany

Tóm tắt

Genetic variability and diversity are the result of a mutation-selection balance that acts permanently within and between species. The presence of deleterious mutations is a necessary consequence of this process and thus “the price paid by a species for its capacity for further evolution” (Haldane 1937, Am Nat 71:337–349). Recent estimations of mutation rate in the human lineage has revived the debate as to whether the high number of deleterious mutations poses a severe problem for the future of mankind. Theoretical considerations allow a scenario in which the survival of the human race is maintained by truncation selection of deleterious mutations that removes as many mutations as appear anew in every generation. In this case our genetic burden is carried by those individuals that suffer a genetic death resulting from random distribution of deleterious alleles. Nevertheless, one has to ask whether the mutation rate may set absolute limits on the complexity of a species.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abel L, Dessein AJ (1997) The impact of host genetics on susceptibility to human infectious diseases. Curr Opin Immunol 9:509–516 Crow JF (1997) The high spontaneous mutation rate: is it a health risk? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:8380–8386 Crow JF (1999) The odds of losing at genetic roulette. Nature 397:293–294 Crow JF, Kimura M (1979) Efficiency of truncation selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:396–399 Eyre-Walker A, Keightley PD (1999) High genomic deleterious mutation rates in hominids. Nature 397:344–347 Eyre-Walker A, Keightley PD (2001) Response to Kondrashov. Trends Genet 17:77–78 Gehlen A (1940) L’Uomo. La sua natura e il suo posto nel mondo. Feltrinelli, Milan Haldane JBS (1937) The effect of variation in fitness. Am Nat 71:337–349 Higgins K, Lynch M (2001) Metapopulation extinction caused by mutation accumulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:2928–2933 Kimura M (1962) On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics 47:713–719 Kimura M (1983) The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Kondrashov AS (1995) Contamination of the genomes by very slightly deleterious mutations. Why have we not died 100 times over? J Theor Biol 175(4):583–594 Kondrashov AS (2001) Sex and U. Trends Genet 17:75–77 Kreitman M (1983) Nucleotide polymorphism at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus ofDrosophila melanogaster. Nature 304:412–417 Lande R (1995) Mutation and conservation. Conserv Biol 9:782–791 Lewontin RC, Hubby JL (1966) A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygoisty in natural populations. II. Amount of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations ofDrosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 54:595–609 Marmor M, Sheppard HW, Donnell D, Bozeman S, Celum C, Buchbinder S, Koblin B, Seage GR (2001) Homozygous and heterozygous CCR5-Delta32 genotypes are associated with resistance to HIV infection. 3rd HIV network for prevention trials vaccine preparedness protocol team. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 27:472–481 Maynard-Smith J (1978) The evolution of sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Mukai T (1964) The genetic structure of natural populations ofDrosophila melanogaster. I. Spontaneous mutation rate of polygenes controlling viability. Genetics 50:1–19 Muller HJ (1927) Artificial transmutation of the gene. Science 66:84–87 Muller HJ (1950) Our load of mutations. Am J Hum Genet 2:111–176 Zuckerkandl E, Pauling L (1965) Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. In: Bryson V, Vogel HJ (eds) Evolving genes and proteins. Academic, New York