Bayesian Approaches to Modeling the Conditional Dependence Between Multiple Diagnostic Tests

Biometrics - Tập 57 Số 1 - Trang 158-167 - 2001
Nandini Dendukuri1, Lawrence Joseph1
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, 1020 Pine Avenue West, Montréal, Québec, H3A 1A2 Canada

Tóm tắt

Summary. Many analyses of results from multiple diagnostic tests assume the tests are statistically independent conditional on the true disease status of the subject. This assumption may be violated in practice, especially in situations where none of the tests is a perfectly accurate gold standard. Classical inference for models accounting for the conditional dependence between tests requires that results from at least four different tests be used in order to obtain an identifiable solution, but it is not always feasible to have results from this many tests. We use a Bayesian approach to draw inferences about the disease prevalence and test properties while adjusting for the possibility of conditional dependence between tests, particularly when we have only two tests. We propose both fixed and random effects models. Since with fewer than four tests the problem is nonidentifiable, the posterior distributions are strongly dependent on the prior information about the test properties and the disease prevalence, even with large sample sizes. If the degree of correlation between the tests is known a priori with high precision, then our methods adjust for the dependence between the tests. Otherwise, our methods provide adjusted inferences that incorporate all of the uncertainty inherent in the problem, typically resulting in wider interval estimates. We illustrate our methods using data from a study on the prevalence of Strongyloides infection among Cambodian refugees to Canada.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alonzo T. A., 1999, Using a combination of reference tests to assess the accuracy of a new diagnostic test, Statistics in Medicine, 22, 2987, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19991130)18:22<2987::AID-SIM205>3.0.CO;2-B

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960715)15:13<1377::AID-SIM275>3.0.CO;2-#

10.2307/2531499

10.1016/0010-4809(78)90001-0

10.1214/ss/1177013215

10.2307/3315793

10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213

10.1214/ss/1177011136

10.1111/1467-9876.00131

Johnson W. O., 1991, Bayesian inference for medical screening tests: Approximations useful for the analysis of acquired immune deficiency syndrome, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 53, 427

10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117428

10.2307/2684892

10.1080/01621459.1998.10473748

10.2307/2533043

Raftery A. E., 1992, Bayesian Statistics, 765

Rubin D., 1988, Using the SIR algorithm to simulate posterior distributions, Bayesian Statistics, 3, 395

10.2307/2983527

Thisted R. A., 1988, Elements of Statistical Computing

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19971015)16:19<2157::AID-SIM653>3.0.CO;2-X

10.2307/2530967

Walter S. D., 1988, Estimation of error rates, disease prevalence, and relative risk misclassified data: A review, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 41, 923, 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90110-2

10.2307/2533555