Basic Principles of a DSS Tool Developed to Prioritize NRW Reduction Measures in Water Pipe Networks
Tóm tắt
Non-revenue water (NRW) in urban water distribution networks is a very demanding task to handle. NRW impacts are economic (lost revenues), environmental (water and energy losses) and social (inefficient water pricing policies not based on the actual water consumption profile/patterns). To deal with NRW, water utilities turn to water audit tools and water loss control methods. In this context, WATERLOSS project (2G-MED09-445) designed a Decision support system (DSS) tool to help water utilities reduce NRW, applying the most cost effective NRW reduction measure(s). The present paper presents the architecture of the DSS tool developed to classify and evaluate NRW control methods available (conventional and proposed ones). The DSS platform includes the DSS tool, which: (a) proposes a list of prioritized NRW reduction measures; (b) evaluates the network’s performance variables and indicators; (c) compares and benchmarks water distribution networks performances; (d) manages the registry of NRW reduction measures; and (e) induces the measures prioritized for any specific system.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alegre H, Baptista JM, Cabrera EJr, Cubillo F, Duarte P, Hirner W, Merkel W, Parena R (2006) Performance indicators for water supply services, 2nd edn. IWAp, London
American Water Works Association (2010) WLCC, Free Water Audit Software v4.2
Haimes Y (2004) Risk modeling, assessment and management. Wiley, Summit
Kanakoudis V, Tsitsifli S (2010) Water volume vs. revenues oriented water balance calculation for urban water networks: the minimum Charge difference component makes a difference!. In: Proceedings of International Conference on WaterLoss, Sao Paolo
Kanakoudis V, Cerk M, Banovec P, Tsitsifli S, Samaras P, Zouboulis AI (2013a) Developing a DSS tool to merge the gap between a water pipe network’s NRW level assessment and the prioritization of the potential healing measures. In: Proceedings of International Conference on IPWE, Izmir, 2013
Kanakoudis V, Tsitsifli S, Samaras P, Zouboulis A, Banovec P (2013b) A new set of water losses related performance indicators focused on areas facing water scarcity conditions. Desalin Water Treat 53:2994–3010
Karadirek I, Kara S, Yilmaz G, Muhammetoglu A, Muhammetoglu H (2010) Implementation of hydraulic modelling for water-loss reduction through pressure management. Water Resour Manag 26:2555–2568
Lambert A, Brown TG, Takizawa M, Weimer D (1999) Review of performance indicators for real losses from water supply systems. Water Supply Res Technol-AQUA 48:227–237
Lambert A (2002) International report: water losses management and techniques. Water Supply 2:1–20
LeaksSuite (2003) www.leakssuite.com
Lee M (1997) Bayesian statistics: an introduction. Wiley, London
McKenzie R, Lambert A (2002) Development of a simple and pragmatic approach to benchmark Real Losses in potable water distribution systems in South Africa: BENCHLEAK, Report TT159/01 published by the SA Water Research Commission
McKenzie R (2007) Aqualite water balance software-user guide. Version 2.0.2, WRC, Report Number TT315/07
Liemberger R, McKenzie R (2003) Aqualibre-a new innovative water balance software. In: IWA/AWWA International Conference on efficient management of urban water supply, Tenerife, April 2003
McKenzie R, Seago C, Liemberger R (2007) Benchmarking of losses from potable water reticulation systems- results from IWA Task Team. In: Proceedings of International Conference on WaterLoss, Bucharest, Vol. 1, pp 161–175
Pate-Cornell M (1993) Subjective de-biasing of data sets: a bayesian approach. Risk-based decision making in water resources VI. ASCE, New York, pp 175–185
Power D (2002) Decision support systems: concepts and resources for managers. Greenwood Publishing Group, westport
Slowinski R (1992) Intelligent decision support: handbook of applications and advances in rough sets theory. Springer, London Business & Economics
Savić D, Bicik J, Morley M (2010) GANeTXL:a DSS generator for multiobjective optimisation of spreadsheet-based models. Environ Modell Softw 5:551–561
Sigma Lite (2000) www.sigmalite.com/caracteristicas-en.php
Volk M, Lautenbach S, van Delden H, Newham L, Seppelt R (2010) How can we make progress with decision support systems in landscape and river basin management? Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of four different decision support systems, environmental management. Environ Manag 46:834–849
WB easycalc (2005) www.liemberger.cc