Basal Phenotype in Breast Carcinoma Occurring in Women Aged 35 or Younger

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 15 - Trang 41-45 - 2008
Rita Bori1, Gábor Cserni1
1Department of Pathology, Bács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital, Kecskemét, Hungary

Tóm tắt

Breast cancer in the young is considered a special clinical presentation of the disease. Sixty-nine breast cancer cases diagnosed at or before the age of 35 were analyzed for common morphological and immunophenotypical features of basal-like carcinomas. Sixteen carcinomas displayed the immunophenotypical characteristics (estrogen receptor and HER2 negativity and positivity for at least one of the following basal markers: cytokeratin 5 or 14, epidermal growth factor receptor, p63) of basal-like carcinomas, and most of them demonstrated characteristic histological features (pushing borders, lymphocytic peritumoral infiltrate, central hypocellular zone or necrosis, high mitotic rate) too. These tumors were more likely to be high-molecular-weight cytokeratin: 34betaE12 and p53 positive by immunohistochemistry. The presence of a basal-like phenotype can be important as concerns systemic treatment issues and could theoretically be associated with a higher rate of BRCA1 mutations in the young, because of the overlap of BRCA1 mutation associated breast carcinomas and the basal-like phenotype.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Fernandopulle SM, Cher-Siangang P, Tan PH (2006) Breast carcinoma in women 35 years and younger: a pathological study. Pathology 38:219–222 Figueiredo JC, Ennis M, Knight JA et al (2007) Influence of young age at diagnosis and family history of breast or ovarian cancer on breast cancer outcomes in a population-based cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 105:69–80 Armes JE, Egan AJ, Southey MC et al (1998) The histologic phenotypes of breast carcinoma occurring before age 40 years in women with and without BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations: a population-based study. Cancer 83:2335–2345 Bennett IC, Freitas R Jr, Fentiman IS (1991) Diagnosis of breast cancer in young women. Aust N Z J Surg 61:284–289 Tai P, Cserni G, Van de Steene J et al (2005) Modeling the effect of age in T1-T2 breast cancer using the SEER database. BMC Cancer 5:130. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-5-130 Trecate G, Vergnaghi D, Manoukian S et al (2006) MRI in the early detection of breast cancer in women with high genetic risk. Tumori 92:517–523 Golshan M, Miron A, Nixon AJ (2006) The prevalence of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in young women with breast cancer undergoing breast-conservation therapy. Am J Surg 192:58–62 Lubiński J, Górski B, Huzarski T et al (2006) BRCA1-positive breast cancers in young women from Poland. Breast Cancer Res Treat 99:71–76 Loizidou M, Marcou Y, Anastasiadou V et al (2007) Contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations to the incidence of early-onset breast cancer in Cyprus. Clin Genet 71:165–170 Foulkes WD, Brunet JS, Stefansson IM et al (2004) The prognostic implication of the basal-like (cyclin E high/p27 low/p53+/glomeruloid-microvascular-proliferation+) phenotype of BRCA1-related breast cancer. Cancer Res 64:830–835 Foulkes WD, Metcalfe K, Sun P et al (2004) Estrogen receptor status in BRCA1- and BRCA2-related breast cancer: the influence of age, grade, and histological type. Clin Cancer Res 10:2029–2034 Laakso M, Loman N, Borg A et al (2005) Cytokeratin 5/14-positive breast cancer: true basal phenotype confined to BRCA1 tumors. Mod Pathol 18:1321–1328 Lakhani SR, Reis-Filho JS, Fulford L et al (2005) Prediction of BRCA1 status in patients with breast cancer using estrogen receptor and basal phenotype. Clin Cancer Res 11:5175–5180 Lidereau R, Eisinger F, Champeme MH et al (2000) Major improvement in the efficacy of BRCA1 mutation screening using morphoclinical features of breast cancer. Cancer Res 60:1206–1210 Foulkes WD, Stefansson IM, Chappuis PO et al (2003) Germline BRCA1 mutations and a basal epithelial phenotype in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1482–1485 Fulford LG, Easton DF, Reis-Filho JS et al (2006) Specific morphological features predictive for the basal phenotype in grade 3 invasive ductal carcinoma of breast. Histopathology 49:22–34 Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:10869–10874 Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J et al (2003) Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:8418–8423 Nielsen TO, Hsu FD, Jensen K et al (2004) Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 10:5367–5374 Bauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD et al (2007) Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer Registry. Cancer 109:1721–1728 Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Green AR et al (2007) Prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer 109:25–32 Elston CW, Ellis IO (1991) Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19:403–410 Ellis IO, Pinder SE, Bobrow L et al (2005) Pathology reporting of breast disease. NHS Publication No 58. Sheffield: NHS Cancer Screening Programmes and the Royal College of Pathologists. Accessed at 12 July 2007. http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/breastscreen/publications/nhsbsp58-low-resolution.pdf DakoCytomation. HercepTestTM, 8th ed. Accessed at 12 July 2007. http://dist.dako.com/prod_downloadpackageinsert.pdf?objectid=105073005 Takei H, Iino Y, Horiguchi J et al (1997) Low and high molecular weight cytokeratins in invasive breast carcinoma. Oncol Rep 4:33–38 Ridolfi RL, Rosen PP, Port A et al (1977) Medullary carcinoma of the breast: a clinicopathologic study with 10 year follow-up. Cancer 40:1365–1385 Tot T (2000) The cytokeratin profile of medullary carcinoma of the breast. Histopathology 37:175–181 Jacquemier J, Padovani L, Rabayrol L et al (2005) Typical medullary breast carcinomas have a basal/myoepithelial phenotype. J Pathol 207:260–268 Reis-Filho JS, Milanezi F, Steele D et al (2006) Metaplastic breast carcinomas are basal-like tumours. Histopathology 49:10–21 Tsuda H, Takarabe T, Hasegawa F et al (2000) Large, central acellular zones indicating myoepithelial tumor differentiation in high-grade invasive ductal carcinomas as markers of predisposition to lung and brain metastases. Am J Surg Pathol 24:197–202 Bratthauer GL, Miettinen M, Tavassoli FA (2003) Cytokeratin immunoreactivity in lobular intraepithelial neoplasia. J Histochem Cytochem 51:1527–1531 van ’t Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ et al (2002) Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 415(6871):530–536 Banerjee S, Reis-Filho JS, Ashley S et al (2006) Basal-like breast carcinomas: clinical outcome and response to chemotherapy. J Clin Pathol 59:729–735