Barriers to outsourcing domestic chores in dual‐earner households

Emerald - 2010
JanWindebank1
1Centre for Gender Studies in Europe, School of Modern Languages and Linguistics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore the reasons women living in dual‐earner households give for not outsourcing domestic chores so as to understand better the barriers to the outsourcing of domestic labour.Design/methodology/approachThe analysis is based on a web questionnaire survey amongst 550 staff of a large service‐sector employer in the UK. Using the Likert scale, reasons why households did or did not outsource domestic chores were investigated.FindingsThe two main reasons for not outsourcing which emerged from the research were first, not being able to afford it and second, the satisfaction individuals derived from looking after their own homes.Research limitations/implicationsThe first finding concerning affordability reinforces previous research that emphasises income as a determining factor in domestic outsourcing. The second finding that some women do not outsource because they put a positive value on looking after their own homes raises the question of whether the under‐development of domestic outsourcing reflects a culture of resistance to the commodification of private life or evidence of the persistence of traditional ideas concerning domesticity and gender identity.Originality/valueMany studies of domestic outsourcing have focused on the provider/supplier. Fewer concentrate on the consumer and where this has been done, it has been those who outsource that have been the focus of research. This article contributes to the debate by concentrating on those who do not outsource regular domestic tasks as a way of understanding the barriers to domestic outsourcing.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bickham Mendez, J. (1998), “Of mops and maids: contradictions and continuities in bureaucratised domestic work”, Social Problems, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 114‐35.

Bittman, M., Matheson, G. and Meagher, G. (1999), “The changing boundary between home and market: Australian trends in outsourcing domestic labour”, Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 249‐73.

Cancedda, A. (2001), Employment in Household Services, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

Coser, L. (1973), “Servants: the obsolescence of an occupational role”, Social Forces, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 31‐40.

Coverman, S. (1985), “Explaining husbands' participation in domestic labor”, Sociological Quarterly, Vol. 26, pp. 181‐97.

Crompton, R. and Lyonette, C. (2006), “Work‐life balance in Europe”, Acta Sociologica, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 379‐93.

Delphy, C. and Leonard, D. (1992), Familiar Exploitation: a New Analysis of Marriage in Contemporary Western Societies, Polity Press, Cambridge.

de Ruitjer, E. (2004), “Trends in the outsourcing of domestic work and childcare in The Netherlands: compositional or behavioural change?”, Acta Sociologica, Vol. 47, pp. 219‐34.

de Ruijter, E., van de Lippe, T. and Raub, W. (2003), “Trust problems in household outsourcing”, Rationality and Society, Vol. 15, pp. 473‐507.

Devetter, F.X. and Rousseau, S. (2005), “L'incitation à la création d'emplois de femmes de ménage est‐elle socialement juste?”, Revue de Philosophie Economique, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 73‐95.

Ehrenreich, B. and Hochschild, A.R. (2003), Global Woman, Granta Books, London.

Eleb, M. (1996), “La frontière mouvante entre vie privée et vie publique dans la maison”, in Kaufmann, J.‐C. (Ed.), Faire ou Faire‐faire: Famille et Services, Presses Universitaires de Rennes, Rennes, pp. 173‐82.

Esping‐Andersen, (1999), Social Foundations of Post‐industrial Economies, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Flipo, A. and Olier, L. (1996), “Faut‐il subventionner les services à domicile?”, Economie et Statistique, Vol. 316‐317, pp. 3‐15.

Gershuny, J.I. (1978), After Industrial Society? The Emerging Self‐service Economy, Macmillan, London.

Gregson, N. and Lowe, M. (1994), Servicing the Middle Classes: Gender and Waged Domestic Labour in Contemporary Britain, Routledge, London.

Hakim, C. (2000), Work‐Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Hamermesh, D. and Lee, J. (2007), “Stressed out on four continents: time crunch or yuppie kvetch”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 89, No. 2, pp. 374‐83.

Hantrais, L. (1990), Managing Professional and Family Life, Dartmouth, Aldershot.

Hochschild, A. (1997), The Time Bind, Metropolitan Books, New York, NY.

Hochschild, A. (2003), The Commercialization of Intimate Life: Notes from Home and Work, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

Institut Français de l'Opinion Publique. (2006), La Réaction des Français à la Mise en Place du CESU, IFOP, Paris.

Iraci, F. (2005), “Regréssion logistique de la consommation de services de proximité aux personnes”. in Rasselet, G. (Ed.), L'Economie Sociale en Perspective, Presses Universitaires de Reims, Reims.

Kamo, Y. (1991), “A non‐linear effect of the number of children on the division of household labor”, Sociological perspectives, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 205‐18.

Kaufmann, J.‐C. (Ed.), (1996), Faire ou Faire‐faire? Famille et Services, Presses Universitaires de Rennes, Rennes.

Lefeuvre, N. (2000) “Employment, family and community activities: a new balance for men and women”, Summary of the French National Report, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions/Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

Madge, and O'Connor. (2002), “On‐line with e‐mums: exploring the internet as a medium for research”, Area, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 92‐102.

Marbot, C. (2008), “En France, qui recourt aux services à domicile?”, France: Portrait Social, La Documentation Française, Paris, pp. 143‐62.

Morris (1985), “Local social networks and domestic organizations”, The Sociological Review, Vol. 33, pp. 327‐42.

Oropesa, R.S. (1993), “Using the service economy to relieve the double burden. Female labour force participation and service purchases”, Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 14, pp. 438‐73.

Piketti, T. (1997), “Les créations d'emplois en France et aux Etats‐Unis, ‘services de proximité’, contre ‘petits boulots?”, Notes de la Fondation Saint‐Simon, December.

Scott, A.J. (2001), “Capitalism, cities and the production of symbolic forms”, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Vol. NS 26, pp. 11‐23.

Soberon‐Ferrer, H. and Dardis, R. (1991), “Determinants of household expenditures for services”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 17, pp. 285‐97.

Warren, T. (2003), “Class and gender‐based working time: time poverty and the division of domestic labour”, Sociology, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 733‐52.

Williams, C.C. and Windebank, J. (2003), “The slow advance and uneven penetration of commodification'”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 250‐64.

Windebank, J. (2001), “Dual‐earner couples in Britain and France: gender divisions of domestic labour and parenting work in different welfare states”, Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 15, No. 22, pp. 269‐90.

Windebank, J. (2006), “Outsourcing women's domestic labour: the Cheque Emploi Service Universel in France”, Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 257‐70.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Thông tin tác giả