BLMT

Baldi P. Bioinformatics. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 1998 Durbin R, Eddy S, Krogh A, et al. Biological sequence analysis: probabilistic models of proteins and nucleic acids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 Searls DB. The language of genes. Nature 2002; 420(6912): 211–7 Baxevanis AD, Ouellette BFF. Bioinformatics: a practical guide to the analysis of genes and proteins. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1998 Bolshoy A, Shapiro K, Trifonov EN, et al. Enhancement of the nucleosomal pattern in sequences of lower complexity. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25(16): 3248–54 Burge C, Karlin S. Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. J Mol Biol 1997; 268: 78–94 Gibas C, Jambeck P. Developing bioinformatics computer skills. Sebastopol (CA): O’Reilly & Associates, 2001 Troyanskaya OG, Arbell O, Koren Y, et al. Sequence complexity profiles of prokaryotic genomic sequences: a fast algorithm for calculating linguistic complexity. Bioinformatics 2002; 18: 679–88 Coin L, Bateman A, Durbin R. Enhanced protein domain discovery by using language modeling techniques from speech recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100: 4516–20 Cheng BYM, Carbonell J, Klein-Seetharaman J. Protein classification based on text document classification techniques. Proteins 2004. In press Ganapathiraju M, Weisser D, Rosenfeld R, et al. Comparative n-gram analysis of whole-genome sequences. Human Language Technologies Conference (HLT2002); 2002 Mar 24–27; San Diego (CA). Ganapathiraju M, Klein-Seetharaman J, Balakrishnan N, et al. Characterization of protein secondary structure using latent semantic analysis. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 2004; 21(3): 78–87 Ganapathiraju M, WeisserD, Klein-Seetharaman J. Yule value tables from protein datasets. SCI2004: 8th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics; 2004 Jul 18–21; Orlando (FL). Weisser D, Klein-Seetharaman J. Identification of fundamental building blocks in protein sequences using statistical association measures. ACM Symposium on Applied Computing; 2004 Mar 14–17; Nicosia, Cyprus. 154–61 Liu Y, Carbonell J, Klein-Seetharaman J, Gopalakrishnan V. Comparison of probabilistic combination methods for protein secondary structure prediction. Bioinformatics. Epub 2004 Jun 24 Erhan S, Marzolf T, Cohen L. Amino-acid neighborhood relationships in proteins: breakdown of amino-acid sequences into overlapping doublets, triplets and quadruplets. Int J Biomed Comput 1980; 11(1): 67–75 Karlin S, Bucher P, Brendel V, et al. Statistical methods and insights for protein and DNA sequences. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 1991; 20: 175–203 Karlin S, Blaisdell BE, Bucher P. Quantile distributions of amino acid usage in protein classes. Protein Eng 1992; 5(8): 729–38 Karlin S, Burge C. Trinucleotide repeats and long homopeptides in genes and proteins associated with nervous system disease and development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93(4): 1560–5 Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, et al. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990; 215: 403–10 Mantegna RN, Buldyrev SV, Goldberger AL, et al. Linguistic features of noncoding DNA sequences. Phys Rev Lett 1994; 73(23): 3169–72 Zipf GK. Selective studies and the principle of relative frequency in language. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1932 Miller GA, Newman EB. Tests of a statistical explanation of the rank-frequency relation for words in written English. Am J Psychol 1958; 71: 209–18 Chatzidimitriou-Dreismann CA, Streffer RM, Larhammar D. Lack of biological significance in the ‘linguistic features’ of noncoding DNA: a quantitative analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 1996; 24(9): 1676–81 Tsonis AA, Elsner JB, Tsonis PA. Is DNA a language?. J Theor Biol 1997; 184(1): 25–9 Niyogi P, Berwick RC. A note on Zipf’s law, natural languages, and noncoding DNA regions. Cambridge (MA): Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge Artificial Intelligence Lab, 1995. Report no.: A024892 Israeloff NE, Kagalenko M, Chan K. Can Zipf distinguish language from noise in noncoding DNA? [letter]. Phys Rev Lett 1996; 76(11): 1976 Li W. Statistical properties of open reading frames in complete contained genome sequences. Comput Chem 1999; 23(3–4): 283–301 Strait BJ, Dewey TG. The Shannon information entropy of protein sequences. Biophys J 1996; 71(1): 148–55 Wu C, Whitson G, McLarty J, et al. Protein classification artificial neural system. Protein Sci 1992; 1: 667–77 Vries JK, Munshi R, Tobi D, et al. A sequence alignment-independent method for protein classification. Appl Bioinformatics 2004; 3(2–3): 61–72 Simons KT, Bonneau R, Ruczinski I, et al. Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA. Proteins 1999; Suppl. 3: 171–6 Kuznetsov IB, Rackovsky S. On the properties and sequence context of structurally ambivalent fragments in proteins. Protein Sci 2003; 12: 2420–33 Hucka M, Finney A, Sauro HM, et al. The ERATO Systems Biology Workbench: enabling interaction and exchange between software tools for computational biology. Pac Symp Biocomput 2002; 7: 450–61 Manber U, Myers G. Suffix arrays: a new method for on-line string searches. SIAM J Comput 1993; 22(5): 935–48 Delcher AL, Kasif S, Fleischman RD, et al. Alignment of whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 1999; 27: 2369–76 Sadakane K, Shibuya T. Indexing huge genome sequences for solving various problems. Genome Inform Ser Workshop Genome Inform 2001; 12: 175–83 Mandel-Gutfreund Y, Gregoret LM. On the significance of alternating patterns of polar and non-polar residues in beta-strands. J Mol Biol 2002; 323: 453–61 Dorohonceanu B, Nevill-Manning CG. Accelerating protein classification using suffix trees. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 2000; 8: 128–33 Bejerano G, Yona G. Variations on probabilistic suffix trees: statistical modeling and prediction of protein families. Bioinformatics 2001; 17: 23–43 Kasai T, Lee G, Arimura H. Linear-time longest-common-prefix computation in suffix arrays and its applications. 12th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching: CPM-2001; 2001 Jul 1–4; Jerusalem. Heidelburg: Springer-Verlag, 2001: 181–92 Bishop YMM, Fienberg SE, Holland PW. Discrete multivariate analysis. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 1975 Clarkson PR, Rosenfeld R. Statistical language modeling using the CMU-Cambridge toolkit. Proceedings ESCA Eurospeech; 1997 Sep 23–25; Rhodes, Greece. Chen SF, Goodman J. An empirical study of smoothing techniques for language modeling. Proceedings of the 34th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL96); 1996 Jun 23–28; Santa Cruz (CA). Chou PY, Fasman GD. Prediction of the secondary structure of proteins from their amino acid sequence. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol 1978; 47: 45–148 Richardson JS, Richardson DC. Amino acid preferences for specific locations at the ends of alpha helices. Science 1988; 240: 1648–52 Cai YD, Liu XJ, Chou KC, et al. Prediction of protein secondary structure content by artificial neural network. J Comput Chem 2003; 24: 727–31 Chen CP, Rost B. State-of-the-art in membrane protein prediction. Appl Bioinformatics 2002; 1(1): 21–35 Cai C, Rosenfeld R, Wasserman L. Exponential language models, logistic regression, and semantic coherence. Proceedings of the NIST/DARPA Speech Transcription Workshop; 2000 May 16–19; Adelphi (MD). Karchin R, Karplus K, Haussler D. Classifying G-protein coupled receptors with support vector machines. Bioinformatics 2002; 18: 147–59 Klein-Seetharaman J, Oikawa M, Grimshaw SB, et al. Long-range interactions within a nonnative protein. Science 2002; 295(5560): 1719–22