Availability of digital object identifiers (DOIs) in Web of Science and Scopus

Brase, 2015, The tenth anniversary of assigning names to scientific data and a five year history of datacite, D-Lib Magazine, 21, 1, 10.1045/january2015-brase Carreiro, 2010, Electronic books: How digital devices and supplementary new technologies are changing the face of the publishing industry, Publishing Research Quarterly, 26, 219, 10.1007/s12109-010-9178-z Chandrakar, 2006, Digital object identifier system: An overview, Electron Library, 24, 445, 10.1108/02640470610689151 Costas, 2012, The value of research data—Metrics for data sets from a cultural and technical point of view Ducut, 2008, An update on Uniform Resource Locator (URL) decay in MEDLINE abstracts and measures for its mitigation, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 8 Franceschini, 2015, Errors in DOI indexing by bibliometrics databases, Scientometrics, 102, 2181, 10.1007/s11192-014-1503-4 Galligan, 2013, Altmetrics: Rethinking the way we measure, Serials Reviews, 39, 56, 10.1080/00987913.2013.10765486 Gorraiz, 2014, The power of book reviews: A simple and transparent enhancement approach for book citation indexes, Scientometrics, 98, 841, 10.1007/s11192-013-1176-4 Gumpenberger, 2013, On the Impact of Gold Open Access Journals, Scientometrics, 96, 221, 10.1007/s11192-012-0902-7 Gumpenberger, 2014, Humanities in the bibliometric spotlight—Research output analysis at the University of Vienna and considerations for increasing visibility, 216 Hammarfelt, 2014, Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities, Scientometrics, 101, 1419, 10.1007/s11192-014-1261-3 Haustein, 2015, Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: The effect of document properties and collaboration patterns, PLoS ONE Haustein, 2014, Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community, Scientometrics, 101, 1145, 10.1007/s11192-013-1221-3 Jobmann, 2014, Altmetrics for large, multidisciplinary research groups: Comparison of current tools, Bibliometrie—Praxis und Forschung, 3 Klump, 2015, DOI for geoscience data—How early practices shape present perceptions, Earth Science Informatics Mooney, 2001, Digital object identifiers for eBooks: What are we identifying?, Publish Research Quarterly, 17, 29, 10.1007/s12109-001-0004-5 Morris, 1998, The DOI and metadata, Learned Publishing, 11, 213 Neumann, 2014, DataCite and DOI names for research data, Journal of Computer—Aided Molecular Design, 28, 1035, 10.1007/s10822-014-9776-5 Peters, 2015, Research data explored: An extended analysis of citations versus and altmetrics, 172 Schroeder, 1998, DOI: “nothing sinister”, Library Journal, 123, 84 Sidman, 2001, A practical guide to automating the digital supply chain with the digital object identifier (DOI), Publishing Research Quarterly, 17, 9, 10.1007/s12109-001-0019-y Simmonds, 1999, The digital object identifier (DOI), Publishing Research Quarterly, 15, 10, 10.1007/s12109-999-0022-2 Surprenant, 1998, The digital object identifier (DOI) and intellectual property rights, 407 Swijghuisen Reigersberg, 2015, Problematizing digital research evaluation using DOIs in practice-based arts, humanities and social science research, F1000Research, 4, 193, 10.12688/f1000research.6506.1 Valderrama-Zurián, 2015, A systematic analysis of duplicate records in Scopus, Journal of Informetrics, 9, 570, 10.1016/j.joi.2015.05.002