Autonomy at the end of life: life-prolonging treatment in nursing homes—relatives’ role in the decision-making process

Journal of Medical Ethics - Tập 35 Số 11 - Trang 672-677 - 2009
Anne Dreyer1, Rei­dun Før­de2, Per Nortvedt2
1Aalesund University College, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
2University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Tóm tắt

Background:The increasing number of elderly people in nursing homes with failing competence to give consent represents a great challenge to healthcare staff’s protection of patient autonomy in the issues of life-prolonging treatment, hydration, nutrition and hospitalisation. The lack of national guidelines and internal routines can threaten the protection of patient autonomy.Objectives:To place focus on protecting patient autonomy in the decision-making process by studying how relatives experience their role as substitute decision-makers.Design:A qualitative descriptive design with analysis of the contents of transcribed in-depth interviews with relatives.Participants:Fifteen relatives of 20 patients in 10 nursing homes in Norway.Results and Interpretations:The main findings reveal deficient procedures for including relatives in decision-making processes. Relatives have poor knowledge about the end of life, and there is little discussion about their role as substitute decision-makers for patients who are not competent to give consent. Few relatives understand the concept of patient autonomy. In Norway the treating physician is responsible for patient treatment. When relatives are included in discussions on treatment, they perceive themselves as responsible for the decision, which is a burden for them afterwards. This qualitative study describes relatives’ experiences, thus providing important information on the improvement potential with the main objective of safeguarding patient autonomy and caring for relatives.Conclusion:The study reveals failing procedures and thus a great potential for improvement. Both ethical and legal aspects must be addressed when considering patient autonomy.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Beauchamp TL Childress JF . Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

British Medical Association. Withholding and withdrawing life-prolonging medical treatment: guidance for decision making, 3rd edn. Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell, 2007.

10.1016/S0300-9572(02)00270-8

Finucane, 2001, Thinking about life-sustaining treatment late in the life of a demented person., Georgia Law Rev, 35, 691

Act of 2 July 1999 No 63 relating to Patients’ Rights (the Patients’ Rights Act) 1999.

Act of 2 July 1999 No 64 relating to Health Personnel (the Health Personnel Act) 1999.

Buchanan AE Brock DW . Deciding for others: the ethics of surrogate decision making. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

10.1016/j.pec.2005.04.012

Carlson, 2007, Death in the nursing home: resident, family, and staff perspectives., J Gerontol Nurs, 33, 32, 10.3928/00989134-20070401-05

10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50207.x

Oliver, 2004, End-of-life care in U.S. nursing homes: a review of the evidence., J Am Med Dir Assoc, 5, 147, 10.1016/S1525-8610(04)70107-3

Patton MQ . Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002.

Denzin NK Lincoln YS . The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005.

Kvale S Brinkmann S . Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2009.

Polit DF Beck CT . Nursing research: principles and methods. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004.

O’Neill O . Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

10.1016/j.jamda.2004.12.013

10.1097/00002093-200107000-00003

10.1001/archinte.160.3.357

Eues, 2007, End-of-life care: improving quality of life at the end of life., Professional Case Manage, 12, 339, 10.1097/01.PCAMA.0000300408.00325.1c

10.1001/archinte.162.14.1611

10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.09.035

10.1177/0969733007086014

10.1089/jpm.2007.0147

10.1089/10966210252785088

10.1093/geront/43.3.309

10.1111/j.1547-5069.2000.00251.x

Vohra, 2004, Family perceptions of end-of-life care in long-term care facilities., J Palliat Care, 20, 297, 10.1177/082585970402000405

10.1093/geront/48.4.485

10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01179.x

Wilson, 1999, Family perspectives on dying in long-term care settings., J Gerontol Nurs, 25, 19, 10.3928/0098-9134-19991101-08

10.1001/jama.1992.03480150073040

10.1136/jme.29.1.10

10.1515/come.2005.2.1.21

Hansen, 2005, Family caregivers making life-sustaining treatment decisions: factors associated with role strain and ease., J Gerontol Nurs, 31, 28, 10.3928/0098-9134-20051101-08

10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.12.006

10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53426.x

10.3200/BMED.32.2.64-70

Beckel, 1996, Resolving ethical problems in long-term care., J Gerontol Nurs, 22, 20, 10.3928/0098-9134-19960101-05

10.1007/s10730-007-9054-1

10.1136/jme.2006.019711

Puchalski, 2000, Patients who want their family and physician to make resuscitation decisions for them: observations from SUPPORT and HELP. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Hospitalized Elderly Longitudinal Project., J Am Geriatr Soc, 48, S84

Rich, 2002, The ethics of surrogate decision making., West J Med, 176, 127

10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.04.006

10.1177/0969733007086015

10.1111/j.1440-172X.2006.00565.x

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Medical Ethics

Tập 35 Số 11

672-677

Thông tin tác giả