Autonomous driving cargo bikes – Introducing an acceptability-focused approach towards a new mobility offer

Karen Krause1, Tom Assmann2, Stephan Schmidt3, Ellen Matthies1
1Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Institute for Psychology, Department Environmental Psychology, Universitätsplatz 2, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
2Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Institut for Logistics and Material Handling Systems (ILM), Universitätsplatz 2, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
3Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Institute for Mobile Systems, Universitätsplatz 2, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany

Tài liệu tham khảo

acatech, 2018 Assmann, 2018, Gewerbliche Nutzung von Lastenrädern - Modelle, Verwendung, Vorteile, 60 Astor, 2001 Aust, 2018 Barbour, 2009 Baum, L., Assmann, T., Strubelt, H. (in press) State of the art – automated micro-vehicles for urban logistics. In 9th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IISE/INFORMS Conference. Berlin, August 28–30, 2019. Becker, 2018, Exploring the potential of free cargo-bikesharing for sustainable mobility, GAIA, 1, 156, 10.14512/gaia.27.1.11 Berufsverband Deutscher Psychologinnen und Psychologen (BDP) e.V, 2017, Mehr Sicherheit durch autonomes Fahren?, Rep. Psychol., 4, 146 Borgstedt, 2017 Büttner Continental, 2013 Dell’Amico, 2014, The bike sharing rebalancing problem: mathematical formulations and benchmark instances, Omega (United Kingdom), 45, 7 Destatis - Statistisches Bundesamt Fagnant, 2015, Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations, In Transp. Res. A Policy Pract., 77, 167, 10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003 Fastenmeier, 2016, Verkehrspsychologie, Rep. Psychol., 41, 260 Frade, 2015, Bike-sharing stations: a maximal covering location approach, Transp. Res. A Policy Pract., 82, 216, 10.1016/j.tra.2015.09.014 Garcia-Gutierrez, 2014, Dimensioning of a bike sharing system (BSS): a study case in Nezahualcoyotl, Mexico, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 162, 253, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.206 Gaudiello, 2016, Trust as indicator of robot functional and social acceptance. An experimental study on user conformation to iCub answers, Comput. Hum. Behav., 61, 633, 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.057 Gauthier, 2013 Geels, 2005 Gruber, 2015, Einflussfaktoren bei der Einführung des Lastenrades im urbanen Wirt-schaftsverkehr, Z. Wirtsch., 59, 115, 10.1515/zfw.2015.0009 Hampel, 2002 Hörl, 2019 Hüsing, 2002 ITDP Khan, 2012, Policy challenges of increasing automation in driving, IATSS Res., 35, 79, 10.1016/j.iatssr.2012.02.002 Koska, 2014 Krueger, 2009 Lenz, 2015, Gesellschaftliche und individuelle Akzeptanz des autonomen Fahrens Mátrai, 2016, Comparative assessment of public bike sharing systems, Transp. Res. Procedia, 14, 2344, 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.261 Matthies, 2008, Partizipative Verfahren und Mediation, 811 Millard-Ball, 2016, Pedestrians, autonomous vehicles, and cities, J. Plan. Educ. Res., 38, 6, 10.1177/0739456X16675674 Morgan, 2010, Advancing our craft: focus group methods and practice, Qual. Health Res., 20, 579, 10.1177/1049732310364625 NEmo, 2019 Neumann-Saavedra, 2015, Anticipatory service network design of bike sharing systems, Transp. Res. Procedia, 10, 355, 10.1016/j.trpro.2015.09.085 Regue, 2014, Proactive vehicle routing with inferred demand to solve the bikesharing rebalancing problem, Transp. Res. E, 72, 192, 10.1016/j.tre.2014.10.005 Schnieder, 2016 Schweizer-Ries, 2010 Venkatesh, 2008, Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions, Decis. Sci., 39, 273, 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x Venkatesh, 2003, User acceptance of information technology - toward a unified view, MIS Q., 27, 425, 10.2307/30036540 Wagner, 2016 WBGU – Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen, 2016 Zientek Zmud, 2017, Towards an understanding of the travel behaviour impact of autonomous vehicles, Transp. Res. Procedia, 25, 2504 Zug, 2019, BikeSharing der 5. Generation - Szenarien und Herausforderungen für den Einsatz autonom agirender Fahrräder