Automated compliance systems

Emerald - 1999
Fredda E.Ackerman1, R.Darrell Mounts2, David U.Thomas3
1décalog, 75–101 Federal Street, Suite 700, Boston, Massachusetts
2Partner at Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LLP in Washington, DC.
3Associate at Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LLP in Washington, DC.

Tóm tắt

In recent years, investment management companies and other financial service entities have placed an increasing emphasis on strengthening their compliance departments and systems. Factors contributing to this heightened emphasis on compliance include the globalisation and growth of the financial services industry; the development of new and more complex financial instruments; increased scrutiny, higher standards, and tougher sanctions from regulators; and several high‐profile failures that resulted, at least in part, from inadequate compliance. To meet the heightened demands placed on compliance personnel, most investment managers have, to a degree utilised advances in technology to ease the burdens and to improve overall compliance. One of the main uses of technology has been to monitor compliance of securities transactions with regulatory and client‐imposed investment requirements and limitations prior to the execution of the transactions (so‐called ‘pre‐trade compliance’). This paper examines automated pre‐trade compliance systems, focusing on the reasons such systems are needed, the types of systems that are available and the benefits and limitations of such systems.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

The, Stevens & Clark (US) and merged with British American Financial Services (UK)

Investment Company Institute, 1996, Mutual Fund Fact Book 34, 36

Investment Company Institute, 1998, March.

Economist The, 1997, Go Forth and Multiply', 25th October

Legal Compliance Audits' Making, 1997, May, 28

'Key Compliance Issues', International Commercial Litigation May 1997, pp.28 - 31.

Fund Arm' Record Fine, 1997, Reuter European Business Report, 16th

John, 1993, 3rd

Gutfreund, supra note 10

Several, Merrin Financial