Autoantibodies in the disease criteria for systemic sclerosis: The need for specification for optimal application

Journal of Translational Autoimmunity - Tập 5 - Trang 100141 - 2022
Jan Damoiseaux1, Judith Potjewijd2, Ruben L. Smeets3,4, Carolien Bonroy5,6
1Central Diagnostic Laboratory, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
2Department of Internal Medicine, Division Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
3Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboudumc Laboratory for Diagnostics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
4Department of Laboratory Medicine—Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
5Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
6Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Mahler, 2020, Autoantibodies to stratify systemic sclerosis patients into clinically actionable subsets, Autoimmun. Rev., 19, 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102583 Masi, 1980, Subcommittee for scleroderma criteria of American rheumatism association diagnostic and therapeutic criteria committee, preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma), Arthritis Rheum., 23, 581, 10.1002/art.1780230510 Douvas, 1979, Identification of a nuclear protein (Scl-70) as a unique target of human antinuclear antibodies in scleroderma, J. Biol. Chem., 254, 10514, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)86738-8 LeRoy, 2001, Criteria for the classification of early systemic sclerosis, J. Rheumatol., 28, 1573 Tan, 1989, Antinuclear antibodies: diagnostic markers for autoimmune diseases and probes for cell biology, Adv. Immunol., 44, 93, 10.1016/S0065-2776(08)60641-0 Koenig, 2008, Autoantibodies and microvascular damage are independent predictive factors for the progression of Raynaud's phenomenon to systemic sclerosis. A twenty-year prospective study of 586 patients, with validation of proposed criteria for early systemic sclerosis, Arthritis Rheum., 58, 3902, 10.1002/art.24038 van den Hoogen, 2013, Classification criteria for systemic sclerosis. An American College of Rheumatology/European League against rheumatism collaborative initiative, Ann. Rheum. Dis., 72, 1747, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204424 Damoiseaux, 2020, The perspective on standardisation and harmonisation: the viewpoint of the EASI president, AutoImmun, Highlights, 11, 4, 10.1186/s13317-020-0127-3 Hahroum, 2021, The mosaic of autoimmunity – a taste for more. The 12th international congress of autoimmunity 2021 (AUTO12) virtual, Autoimmun. Rev., 20 Reveille, 2003, The American College of Rheumatology Ad Hoc committee on immunologic testing guidelines, evidence-based guidelines for the use of immunologic tests: anticentromere, Scl-70, and nucleolar antibodies, Arthritis Rheum., 49, 399, 10.1002/art.11113 Sobanski, 2014, Prevalence of anti-RNA polymerase III antibodies in systemic sclerosis: new data from a French cohort and a systematic review and meta-analysis, Arthritis Rheum., 66, 407, 10.1002/art.38219 Mehra, 2013, Autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis, Autoimmun. Rev., 12, 340, 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.05.011 Didier, 2018, Autoantibodies associated with connective tissue diseases: what meaning for clinicians?, Front. Immunol., 9, 541, 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00541 Fransen, 2012, Items for developing revised classification criteria in systemic sclerosis: results of a consensus exercise, Arthritis Care Res., 64, 351, 10.1002/acr.20679 Johnson, 2012, Validation of potential classification criteria for systemic sclerosis, Arthritis Care Res., 64, 358, 10.1002/acr.20684 Bonroy, 2012, Optimization and diagnostic performance of a single multiparameter lineblot in the serological workup of systemic sclerosis, J. Immunol. Methods, 379, 53, 10.1016/j.jim.2012.03.001 Alkema, 2021, Autoantibody profiles in systemic sclerosis; a comparison of diagnostic tests, Autoimmunity, 54, 148, 10.1080/08916934.2021.1907842 Chan, 2015, Report of the first international consensus on standardized nomenclature of antinuclear antibody HEp-2 cell patterns 2014-2015, Front. Immunol., 6, 412, 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00412 Damoiseaux, 2019, Clinical relevance of HEp-2 indirect immunofluorescent patterns: the International Consensus on ANA patters (ICAP) perspective, Ann. Rheum. Dis., 78, 879, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214436 von Mühlen, 2021, How to report the antinuclear antibodies (anti-cell antibodies) test on HEp-2 cells: guidelines from the ICAP initiative, Immunol. Res., 69, 594, 10.1007/s12026-021-09233-0 Damoiseaux, 2006, From ANA to ENA: how to proceed?, Autoimmun. Rev., 5, 10, 10.1016/j.autrev.2005.05.007 Vulsteke, 2021, Titre-specific positive predictive value of anti-nuclear antibody patterns, Ann. Rheum. Dis., 80, e128, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216245 Andrade, 2018, On behalf of the Executive Committee of ICAP, International consensus on antinuclear antibody patterns: definition of the AC-29 pattern associated with antibodies to DNA topoisomerase I, Clin. Chem. Lab. Med., 56, 1783, 10.1515/cclm-2018-0188 Solomon, 2002, Evidence-based guidelines for the use of immunogic tests: antinuclear antibody testing, Arthritis Rheum., 47, 434, 10.1002/art.10561 Mahler, 2014, Current concepts and future directions for the assessment of autoantibodies to cellular antigens referred to as anti-nuclear antibodies, J. Immunol. Res., 2014, 10.1155/2014/315179 Aringer, 2019, European League against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus, Ann, Rheum. Dis., 78, 1151, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214819 Bonroy, 2013, The integration of the detection of systemic sclerosis-associated antibodies in a routine laboratory setting: comparison of different strategies, Clin. Chem. Lab. Med., 51, 2151, 10.1515/cclm-2013-0211 Damoiseaux, 2014, Are autoantibodies to RNA-polymerase III to be incorporated in routine diagnostic laboratory algorithms for systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases?, Ann. Rheum. Dis., 73, e29, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205193 Lundberg, 2017, Ann. Rheum. Dis., 76, 1955, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211468 Fierz, 2021, Likelihood ratio approach and clinical interpretation of laboratory tests, Front. Immunol., 12, 10.3389/fimmu.2021.655262