Australian Academic Librarians' Perceptions of Effective Web 2.0 Tools Used to Market Services and Resources

The Journal of Academic Librarianship - Tập 40 Số 3-4 - Trang 220-227 - 2014
Zhixian Yi1
1School of Information Studies, Faculty of Education, Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Boorooma Street, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

A.C.R.L. Research Planning Review Committee, 2010, 2010 top ten trends in academic libraries: A review of the current literature, College & Research Libraries News, 71, 286, 10.5860/crln.71.6.8385

Aharony, 2010, Twitter use in libraries: An exploratory analysis, Journal of Web Librarianship, 4, 333, 10.1080/19322909.2010.487766

Baro, 2013, Web 2.0 tools usage: A comparative study of librarians in university libraries in Nigeria and South Africa, Library Hi Tech News, 30, 10, 10.1108/LHTN-04-2013-0021

Breeding, 2007, Librarians face online social networks, Computers in Libraries, 27, 30

Breeding, 2009, Maximizing the impact of digital collections, Computers in Libraries, 29, 32

Burkhardt, 2010, Social media: A guide for college and university libraries, College & Research Libraries News, 71, 10, 10.5860/crln.71.1.8302

Cuddy, 2010, Implementing Twitter in a health sciences library, Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 29, 320, 10.1080/02763869.2010.518915

Ekart, 2011, Making Twitter work for you, Computers in Libraries, 31, 34

Facebook

Farkis, 2007, Going where patrons are: Outreach in MySpace and Facebook, American Libraries, 4, 7

Fields, 2010, A unique twitter use for reference services, Library Hi Tech News, 27, 14, 10.1108/07419051011095863

Frank, 2007

Garcia-Milian, 2012, The presence of academic health sciences libraries on Facebook: The relationship between content and library popularity, Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 31, 10.1080/02763869.2012.670588

Granfield, 2008, Preference for reference: New options and choices for academic library users, Reference and User Services Quarterly, 48, 44, 10.5860/rusq.48n1.44

Hendrix, 2009, Use of Facebook in academic health sciences libraries, Journal of the Medical Library Association, 97, 44, 10.3163/1536-5050.97.1.008

Hinchliffe, 2011, Innovation as a framework for adopting Web 2.0 marketing approaches, 58

Ismail, 2010, What net generation students really want: Determining library help-seeking preferences of undergraduates, Reference Services Review, 38, 10, 10.1108/00907321011020699

Jansen, 2009, Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth, Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 60, 2169, 10.1002/asi.21149

Khan, 2012, Application of social media in marketing of library and information services: A case study from Pakistan, Webology, 9

Kho, 2011, Social media in libraries: Keys to deeper engagement, Information Today, 28, 31

Kim, 2010, Adoption of library 2.0 functionalities by academic libraries and users: A knowledge management perspective, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36, 211, 10.1016/j.acalib.2010.03.003

Landis, 2007, Friending our users: Social networking and reference services

Mack, 2007, Reaching students with Facebook: Data and best practices, Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship, 8

Maness, 2006, Library 2.0: The next generation of web-based library services, Logos, 17, 139, 10.2959/logo.2006.17.3.139

Milstein, 2009, Twitter FOR libraries (and librarians), Computers in Libraries, 29, 17

Moulaison, 2011, Staying free from ‘corporate marketing machines’ library policy for Web 2.0 tools, 43

Naylor, 2008, Why isn't our chat reference used more? Finding of focus group discussions with undergraduate students, Reference and User Services Quarterly, 47, 342, 10.5860/rusq.47n4.342

Nesta, 2011, Library 2.0 or library III: Returning to leadership, Library Management, 32, 85, 10.1108/01435121111102601

Nguyen, 2008, A survey of the application of Web 2.0 in Australasian university libraries, Library Hi Tech, 26, 630, 10.1108/07378830810920950

O’Reilly

Park, 2010, Differences among university students and faculties in social networking site perception and use: Implications for academic library services, The Electronic Library, 28, 417, 10.1108/02640471011051990

Rodzvilla, 2010, New title tweets, Computers in Libraries, 30, 27

Sarantakos, 2005

Stuart, 2010, What are libraries doing on twitter?, Online, 34, 45

Tripathi, 2010, Use of Web 2.0 tools in academic libraries: A reconnaissance of the international landscape, The International Information & Library Review, 42, 195, 10.1080/10572317.2010.10762864

Vucovich, 2013, Is the time and effort worth it? One library's evaluation of using social networking tools for outreach, Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 32, 12, 10.1080/02763869.2013.749107

Xia, 2009, Marketing library services through Facebook groups, Library Management, 30, 469, 10.1108/01435120910982159

Xu, 2009, The academic library meets Web 2.0: Applications and implications, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35, 324, 10.1016/j.acalib.2009.04.003

Yi, 2013, Australian academic librarians' perceptions of marketing services and resources, Library Management, 34, 585, 10.1108/LM-01-2013-0002

YouTube