Augmented futures? Scenarios and implications of augmented reality use in public spaces

Aissaoui, 2022, The digital divide: a literature review and some directions for future research in light of COVID-19, Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 71, 686, 10.1108/GKMC-06-2020-0075 Alizadeh, 2022, The contribution of urban public space to the social interactions and empowerment of women, Journal of Urban Affairs, 1, 10.1080/07352166.2022.2095915 Amer, 2013, A review of scenario planning, Futures, 46, 23, 10.1016/j.futures.2012.10.003 Avin, 2020, Using Exploratory Scenarios in Planning Practice, Journal of the American Planning Association, 86, 403, 10.1080/01944363.2020.1746688 Azuma, 2019, The road to ubiquitous consumer augmented reality systems, Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1, 26, 10.1002/hbe2.113 Azuma, 2001, Recent advances in Augmented Reality, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21, 34, 10.1109/38.963459 Badde, 2021 Bai, 2016, Plausible and desirable futures in the Anthropocene: A new research agenda, Global Environmental Change, 39, 351, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.017 Barad, 2007 Barad, 2014, Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart, Parallax, 20, 168, 10.1080/13534645.2014.927623 Barad, 2015, Verschränkungen und Politik. Karen Barad im Gespräch mit Jennifer Sophia Theodor, dies Verschränkungen Berlin: Merve Bauder, M. (2021). Raum. In T. Bork-Hüffer, H. Füller, & T. Straube (Eds.), Handbuch digitale Geographien: Welt - Wissen - Werkzeuge (pp. 77–91). Paderborn: Brill Schöningh Stuttgart: UTB. Bengston, 2018, Principles for thinking about the future and foresight education, World Futures Review, 10, 193, 10.1177/1946756718777252 Berger, 2022, A digital push with real impact – Mapping effective digital nudging elements to contexts to promote environmentally sustainable behavior, Journal of Cleaner Production, 380, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134716 Bjola, 2020, Digital propaganda, counterpublics and the disruption of the public sphere: the Finnish approach to building digital resilience, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 33, 638, 10.1080/09557571.2019.1704221 Börjeson, 2006, Scenario types and techniques: Towards a user's guide, Futures, 38, 723, 10.1016/j.futures.2005.12.002 Bork-Hüffer, 2021 Bork-Hüffer, 2021, (Cyber)Bullying in schools – when bullying stretches across cON/FFlating spaces, Children’s Geographies, 19, 241, 10.1080/14733285.2020.1784850 Bork-Hüffer, 2021, Kollektivität in und durch cON/FFlating spaces, Zeitschrift für Kultur-und Kollektivwissenschaft, 6, 131, 10.14361/zkkw-2020-060208 Bowman, 2013, Storytelling and the scenario process: Understanding success and failure, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80, 735, 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.009 Broll, 2019, Augmentierte Realität, 315 Butler, 2021 Capurro, 2018, Digitale Zukünfte, agora, 42, 64 Capurro, 2020, Digital Futures: A brief essay on sustainable life in the digital age, Mètode Science Studies Journal, 59 Cardullo, 2019, Being a ‘citizen’in the smart city: Up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation in Dublin, Ireland, GeoJournal, 84, 1, 10.1007/s10708-018-9845-8 Cinnamon, 2017, Social Injustice in Surveillance Capitalism, Surveillance & Society, 15, 609, 10.24908/ss.v15i5.6433 Datta, 2018, The digital turn in postcolonial urbanism: Smart citizenship in the making of India's 100 smart cities, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 43, 405, 10.1111/tran.12225 Dear, 1998, Postmodern urbanism, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88, 50, 10.1111/1467-8306.00084 Del Casino Jr, 2022, The social life of robots: The politics of algorithms, governance, and sovereignty, Machine Learning and the City: Applications in Architecture and Urban Design, 603 Digitalization for Sustainability (2022). Digital reset: redirecting technologies for the deep sustainability transformation. Retrieved fromhttps://digitalization-for-sustainability.com/wp-content/uploads/D4S_DigitalReset_Web.pdf. Dijck, 2020, Governing digital societies: Private platforms, public values, Comput Law Secur Rev, 36 Ducasse, 2020, Augmented reality for outdoor environmental education, Augmented Reality in Education: A New Technology for Teaching and Learning, 329, 10.1007/978-3-030-42156-4_17 EEAS (2020). China, die Vereinigten Staaten und wir. Retrieved from https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/china-united-states-and-us_en?s=102&page_lang=de. Accessed June 6, 2023. European Parliament. (2023). AI Act: a step closer to the first rules of Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20230505IPR84904/ai-act-a-step-closer-to-the-first-rules-on-artificial-intelligence. Accessed June 6, 2023. Foucault, 1980 Gomez, 1999 Hamstead, 2021 Harborth, 2022, Human autonomy in the era of augmented reality—a roadmap for future work, Information, 13, 289, 10.3390/info13060289 Heemsbergen, 2021, Conceptualising augmented reality: from virtual divides to mediated dynamics, Convergence, 27, 830, 10.1177/1354856521989514 Höhl, 2015, Augmented Reality im öffentlichen Raum, 73 Hopkins, 2007, Engaging the Future: Tools for Effective Planning Practices Hubbard, 2006 Humphreys, 2010, Mobile Social Networks and Urban Public Space, New Media & Society, 12, 763, 10.1177/1461444809349578 IDDRI, FING, WWF France, & GreenIT.fr, 2018, White Paper: Digital Technology and Environment. Using the digital transition to accelerate the ecological transition Retrieved from 〈https://www.iddri.org/en/publications-and-events/report/white-paper-digital-economy-and-environment〉. Kaspar, 2012 Kaufmann, 2021, Ethical challenges of researching emergent socio-material-technological phenomena: insights from an interdisciplinary mixed-methods project using mobile eye-tracking, Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 19, 391, 10.1108/JICES-01-2021-0007 Kernaghan, S. (2016). Google glass: An evaluation of social acceptance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Kim, 2022, Assessing distraction potential of augmented reality head-up displays for vehicle drivers, Human Factors, 64, 852, 10.1177/0018720819844845 Kind, S., Ferdinand, J.-P., Jetzke, T., Richter, S., & Weide, S. (2019). Virtual und Augmented Reality. Berlin. Kleine, 2016, Digital Divide Kluitenberg, 2006, The Network of Waves, 6 Kollert, 2021, Mapping of 3D-Eye-Tracking in Urban Outdoor Environments, ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 4, 201, 10.5194/isprs-annals-V-4-2021-201-2021 Kosow, 2015, Die Szenariotechnik als Methode der Experten- und Stakeholdereinbindung, 217 Kowalski, 2023 Kwiatkowski, 2018 Lee, 2021, Towards augmented reality driven human-city interaction: Current research on mobile headsets and future challenges, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54, 1 Liao, 2021, A future so close: Mapping 10 years of promises and futures across the augmented reality development cycle, New Media & Society, 23, 258, 10.1177/1461444820924623 Lynch, 2020, Contesting Digital Futures: Urban Politics, Alternative Economies, and the Movement for Technological Sovereignty in Barcelona, Antipode, 52, 660, 10.1111/anti.12522 Mack, N.A., & Schmidt, L. (2019). Evaluierung der sozialen Akzeptanz verschiedener Interaktionsarten für Augmented-Reality-Datenbrillen. In Gesellschaft für Informatik eV (Ed.), Mensch und Computer 2019. Bonn. Markley, 2011, A new methodology for anticipating STEEP surprises, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 1079, 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.01.008 Marlow, 2015 Massey, 2005, For space, For Space, 1 Meinert, 2014 Montero, C.S., Alexander, J., Marshall, M.T., & Subramanian, S., 2010, Would you do that? Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services - MobileHCI '10, New York. 〈http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1851600〉. Németh, 2011, Space, Place and the City: Emerging Research on Public Space Design and Planning, Journal of Urban Design, 15, 453 Niederberger, 2015, Methoden der Experteneinbindung, 33 Nijholt, A. (2021). Experiencing Social Augmented Reality in Public Spaces. Paper presented at the Adjunct Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, New York. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3460418.3480157. Ortiz, 2004, Women’s use of public space and sense of place in the Raval (Barcelona), GeoJournal, 61, 219, 10.1007/s10708-004-3539-0 Ouma, 2020, Envisioning African futures: Perspectives from economic geography, Geoforum, 115, 146, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.05.030 Pillkahn, 2008 Rauschnabel, 2016, Augmented reality smart glasses: An investigation of technology acceptance drivers, International Journal of Technology Marketing, 11, 123, 10.1504/IJTMKT.2016.075690 Rauschnabel, P.A., Babin, B.J., tom Dieck, M.C., Krey, N., & Jung, T., 2022, What is augmented reality marketing? Its definition, complexity, and future (Vol. 142, pp. 1140–1150): Elsevier. Renda, A., Pupillo, L., Fanni, R., & Polito, C. (2021). The Digital Transition-Towards a Resilient and Sustainable Post-Pandemic Recovery. Task Force Working Group Report. Retrieved from https://www.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/The-Digital-Transition_CEPS-TF-WGR.pdf. Rockmann, L., & Adler, S. (2015). Augmented-Reality als Erweiterungs-Tool des partizipativen Austausches in Planungsprozessen zum Ziel einer integrativen städtebaulichen Entwicklung. In M. Schrenk, V. V. Popovič, P. Zeile, P. Elisei & C. Beyer (Eds.): REAL CORP 2015. Plan Together – Right Now – Overall. From Vision to Reality for Vibrant Cities and Regions. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society. (pp. 83-92). Wien: CORP - Competence Center of Urban and Regional Planning. Rovira, 2020, Guidance and surroundings awareness in outdoor handheld augmented reality, PLOS ONE, 15, 10.1371/journal.pone.0230518 Schmalz, 2021, Lessons learned from a two-round Delphi-based scenario study, MethodsX, 8, 10.1016/j.mex.2020.101179 UN-Habitat (2015). World habitat day: importance of public spaces. Retrieved from 〈https://unhabitat.org/un-habitat-and-un-women-host-event-on-public-space〉. van den Berg, 2021, Updating scenarios: A multi-layer framework for structurally incorporating new information and uncertainties into scenarios, Futures, 130, 1, 10.1016/j.futures.2021.102751 van Lente, 2013, Comparing technological hype cycles: Towards a theory, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80, 1615, 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.12.004 Vester, 2008 Vinders, J., & Howkins, B. (2023). Enhancing EU legal frameworks for Digital Extended Reality. (Policy Brief). TechEthos. Retrieved from https://www.techethos.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/TECHETHOS-POLICY-BRIEF_Digital-Extended-Reality_for-web.pdf. Wagner-Schelewsky, 2019, Online-Befragung, Vol. 72, 787 WBGU (2019a). A European way to our common digital future. Policy Paper no. 11. Retrieved from https://www.wbgu.de/fileadmin/user_upload/wbgu/publikationen/politikpapiere/pp11_2019/wbgu_pp11_en_navi.pdf. WBGU (2019b). Unsere gemeinsame digitale Zukunft. Retrieved from https://www.wbgu.de/fileadmin/user_upload/wbgu/publikationen/hauptgutachten/hg2019/pdf/wbgu_hg2019.pdf. Zuboff, S. (2018). Das Zeitalter des Überwachungskapitalismus. Frankfurt: Campus.