Auditors general's universe revisited

Emerald - 2008
DanielleMorin1
1HEC Montreal, Chemin de la Côte Ste‐Catherine, Montreal, Canada

Tóm tắt

PurposeAs practised by Auditors General in governmental organizations, the value for money (VFM) audit is ultimately destined to improve the management of public affairs. This study aims to examine to what extent Auditor General of Quebec has been achieving this objective through the VFM audits conducted in the Canadian province of Quebec from 1995 to 2002. For the purposes of this research, a model was designed that measured the impact these VFM audits may have had on the management of the organizations audited and that exposed the determinants of this impact.Design/methodology/approachA survey was sent out exclusively to auditees who are the representatives of the organizations audited: top and middle managers and department professionals (specialists in their area: health, education, etc.) having interacted with the auditors during VFM audits. A five‐category Likert‐type scale was selected for the survey. A total of 188 questionnaires were sent out and, of the questionnaires filled out by auditees, a total of 99 were considered valid, that is 53 percent response rate. Quantitative analysis was performed using SPSS software. For each of the elements measuring the impact of VFM audits on the management of organizations audited, principal components factor analysis (with VARIMAX rotation when there was more than one factor) was performed. These analyses sought to understand the correlation structure of the variables for each of the elements.FindingsThe changes made after the auditors' visits have not been radical and there have been no revolutions in the organizations audited, but the influence of auditors is perceptible for all ten of the elements measured. The will of those at the base of the organization and the intervention of parliamentarians turn out to have a decisive influence on the impact that auditors will or will not have on the management of organizations audited.Research limitations/implicationsThe point of view reported is exclusively that of auditees. There can be no claim for total objectivity on their part. Moreover, it was practically impossible to corroborate their statements with other sources. Some respondents might have tended to minimize the influence that auditors might have had on them. Others could have shaped facts to their advantage.Originality/valueMeasurement of the impact of VFM audits on the management of government organizations, from auditees' point of view, has not been much examined by scholars. This research constitutes a major contribution to advance knowledge about the impact of VFM audits in a Canadian context.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Auditor General of Canada (2003), 2003 Reports of the Auditor General of Canada, Government‐Wide Audit of Sponsorship, Advertising, and Public Opinion Research, Chapters 3, 4 & 5, Auditor General of Canada, Ottawa.

Blume, L. and Voigt, S. (2007), “Supreme audit institutions: supremely superfluous? A cross country assessment”, Working Paper No. 3, International Centre for Economic Research, Mannheim.

Carson, P.P. and Carson, K.D. (1993), “Deming versus traditional management theorists on goal setting: can both be right?”, Business Horizons, Vol. 36 No. 5, pp. 79‐86.

Commission of Inquiry into the Sponsorship Program and Advertising Activities (2005), “Who is responsible?”, Phase 1 Report, Publishing and Depository Services, Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa, p. 792.

Deming, W.E. (1986), Out of the Crisis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

Fayol, H. (1959), General and Industrial Management, Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons, London.

Johnsen, A., Meklin, P., Oulasvirta, L. and Vakkuri, J. (2001), “Performance auditing in local government: an exploratory study of perceived efficiency of municipal value for money auditing in Finland and Norway”, The European Accounting Review, Vol. 10, pp. 583‐99.

Lapsley, I. and Pong, C.K.M. (2000), “Modernization versus problematization: value‐for‐money audit in public services”, The European Accounting Review, Vol. 9, pp. 541‐67.

Malloy, J. (2004), “An auditor's best friend? Standing committees on public accounts”, Canadian Public Administration (Administration publique du Canada), Vol. 47 No. 2, pp. 165‐83.

Morin, D. (1999), “La vérification de l'optimisation des ressources dans les gouvernements du Canada et du Québec: un processus d'influence sociale (“Value for money audit in Canada and Quebec governments: a social influence process”)”, PhD dissertation, École nationale d'administration publique, Quebec.

Morin, D. (2000), “La vie après une mission de vérification de l'optimisation des ressources: le point de vue des gestionnaires (“Life after value for money audit: auditees' standpoint”)”, Canadian Public Administration (Administration publique du Canada), Vol. 43, pp. 432‐52.

Morin, D. (2001), “Influence of value for money on public administrations: looking beyond appearances”, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 17, pp. 99‐117.

Morin, D. (2003), “Controllers or catalysts for change and improvement: would the real value for money auditors please stand up?”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 18 Nos 1/2, pp. 19‐30.

Morin, D. (2004), “Measuring the impact of value‐for‐money audits: a model for surveying audited managers”, Canadian Public Administration (Administration publique du Canada), Vol. 47 No. 2, pp. 141‐64.

Peterson, R.A. (2000), Constructing Effective Questionnaires, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Pollitt, C., Girre, X., Lonsdale, J., Mul, R., Summa, H. and Waerness, M. (1999), Performance or Compliance? Performance Audit and Public Management in Five Countries, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Schwartz, B. (2000), “Self‐determination: the tyranny of freedom”, American Psychologist, Vol. 55 No. 1, pp. 79‐88.

Smith, P. (1993), “Outcome‐related performance indicators and organizational control in the public sector”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 4, pp. 135‐51.

Smith, P. (1995), “On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sector”, International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 18 Nos 2/3, pp. 277‐310.

Sterck, M. (2007), “Impact of performance audit”, in Conings, V., Sterck, M. and Bouckaert, G. (Eds), Budgeting, Accounting and Auditing for Results – Towards Integrated Financial Management, Vol. 163, Steunpunt Bestuurlijke Organisatie Vlaanderen, Leuven, pp. 95‐123.

Taylor, F.W. (1967), The Principles of Scientific Management, Norton, New York, NY.

Vanlandingham, G.R. (2006), “A voice crying in the wilderness – legislative oversight agencies' efforts to achieve utilization”, dissertation submitted to the Askew School of Public Administration and Policy in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy, The Florida State University, College of Social Sciences, Tallahassee, FL.

Weber, M. (1946), “Bureaucracy”, in Gerth, H.H. and Wright Mills, C. (Eds), Essays in Sociology, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Thông tin tác giả