Attributing the burden of cancer at work: three areas of concern when examining the example of shift-work

Thomas C. Erren1, Peter Morfeld2
1Institute and Policlinic for Occupational Medicine, Environmental Medicine and Prevention Research, University of Cologne, Kragujevac, Germany
2Institute for Occupational Epidemiology and Risk Assessment (IERA), Evonik Industries AG, Kragujevac, Germany

Tóm tắt

AbstractThis commentary intends to instigate discussions about epidemiologic estimates and their interpretation of attributable fractions (AFs) and the burden of disease (BOD) of cancers due to factors at workplaces. By examining recent work that aims to estimate the number of cancers attributable to shift-work in Britain, we suggest that (i) causal, (ii) practical and (iii) methodological areas of concern may deter us from attributable caseload estimations of cancers at this point in time. Regarding (i), such calculations may have to be avoided as long as we lack established causality between shift-work and the development of internal cancers. Regarding (ii), such calculations may have to be avoided as long as we can neither abandon shift-work nor identify personnel that may be unaffected by shift-work factors. Regarding (iii), there are at least four methodological pitfalls which are likely to make AF calculations uninterpretable at this stage. The four pitfalls are: (1) The use of Levin's 1953 formula in case of adjusted relative risks; (2) The use of broad definitions of exposure in calculations of AFs; (3) The non-additivity of AFs across different levels of exposure and covariables; (4) The fact that excess mortality counts are misleading due to the fact that a human being dies exactly once - a death may occur earlier or later, but a death cannot occur more than once nor can it be avoided altogether for any given individual. Overall, causal, practical and methodological areas of concern should be diligently considered when performing and interpreting AF or BOD computations which - at least at the present time - may not be defensible.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Steenland K, Burnett C, Lalich N, Ward E, Hurrell J: Dying for work: The magnitude of US mortality from selected causes of death associated with occupation. Am J Ind Med 2003, 43:461–482.

Driscoll T, Nelson DI, Steenland K, Leigh J, Concha-Barrientos M, Fingerhut M, Prüss-Ustün A: The global burden of disease due to occupational carcinogens. Am J Ind Med 2005,48(6):419–431.

Driscoll T, Nelson DI, Steenland K, Leigh J, Concha-Barrientos M, Fingerhut M, Prüss-Ustün A: The global burden of non-malignant respiratory disease due to occupational airborne exposures. Am J Ind Med 2005,48(6):432–445.

Driscoll T, Takala J, Steenland K, Corvalan C, Fingerhut M: Review of estimates of the global burden of injury and illness due to occupational exposures. Am J Ind Med 2005,48(6):491–502.

Nelson DI, Concha-Barrientos M, Driscoll T, Steenland K, Fingerhut M, Punnett L, Prüss-Ustün A, Leigh J, Corvalan C: The global burden of selected occupational diseases and injury risks: Methodology and summary. Am J Ind Med 2005,48(6):400–418.

WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data 2009: Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. [http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GlobalHealthRisks_report_full.pdf]

Steenland K, Armstrong B: An overview of methods for calculating the burden of disease due to specific risk factors. Epidemiology 2006,17(5):512–519.

Morfeld P: Calculating disease burden. Epidemiology 2007,18(2):283. author reply 283–284

Rushton L, Hutchings S, Brown T: The burden of cancer at work: estimation as the first step to prevention. Occup Environ Med 2008,65(12):789–800.

Rushton L, Bagga S, Bevan R, Brown TP, Cherrie JW, Holmes P, Fortunato L, Slack R, Van Tongeren M, Young C, Hutchings SJ: Occupation and cancer in Britain. Br J Cancer 2010,102(9):1428–1437.

Hutchings S, Rushton L: Toward risk reduction: predicting the future burden of occupational cancer. Am J Epidemiol 2011,173(9):1069–1077.

Cherrie JW, Gorman Ng M, Shafrir A, van Tongeren M, Mistry R, Sobey M, Corden C, Rushton L, Hutchings S: Health, socio-economic and environmental aspects of possible amendments to the EU Directive on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens and mutagens at work. SHEcan summary report. Research Project: P937/IOM. Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, UK;

Straif K, Baan R, Grosse Y, Secretan B, El Ghissassi F, Bouvard V, Altieri A, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Cogliano V: Carcinogenicity of shift-work, painting, and fire-fighting. Lancet Oncol 2007,8(12):1065–1066.

Erren TC: Shift work, cancer and "white-box" epidemiology: Association and causation. Epidemiol Perspect Innov 2010, 7:11.

Straif K: The burden of occupational cancer. Occup Environ Med 2008,65(12):787–788.

Erren TC: Does light cause internal cancers? The problem and challenge of an ubiquitous exposure. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2002,23(Suppl 2):61–70.

Stevens RG: Lighting during the day and night: possible impact on risk of breast cancer. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2002,23(Suppl 2):57–60.

Poole C: The darkness at the end of the tunnel: summary and evaluation of an international symposium on light, endocrine systems and cancer. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2002,23(Suppl 2):71–78.

IARC: Painting, Firefighting, and Shiftwork. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans 2010., 98:

Erren TC, Groß JV, Morfeld P: Primary prevention of global cancer: In favour of controlling proven, but not probable, causes of cancer. Environmental Health Perspectives 2011. In Press

Erren TC, Reiter RJ: A generalized theory of carcinogenesis due to chronodisruption. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2008, 29:815–821.

Erren TC, Reiter RJ: Defining chronodisruption. J Pineal Res 2009, 46:245–247.

Morfeld P: Calculating disease burden. Epidemiology 2007, 18:283. author reply 283–284

Levin ML: The occurrence of lung cancer in man. Acta Unio Int Contra Cancrum 1953, 9:531–541.

Rockhill B, Newman B, Weinberg C: Use and misuse of population attributable fractions. Am J Public Health 1998, 88:15–19.

Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL: Modern epidemiology. 3rd edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.

Miettinen 0S: Proportion of disease caused or prevented by a given exposure, trait, or intervention. Am J Epidemiol 1974, 99:325–332.

Darrow LA, Steenland NK: Confounding and bias in the attributable fraction. Epidemiology 2011, 22:53–58.

Greenland S: Bias in methods for deriving standardized morbidity ratio and attributable fraction estimates. Stat Med 1984, 3:131–141.

Flegal KM, Graubard BI, Williamson DF: Methods of calculating deaths attributable to obesity. Am J Epidemiol 2004, 160:331–338.

Greenland S: Attributable fractions: bias from broad definition of exposure. Epidemiology 2001, 12:518–520.

Kauppinen T, Toikkanen J, Pedersen D, Young R, Ahrens W, Boffetta P, Hansen J, Kromhout H, Maqueda Blasco J, Mirabelli D, de la Orden-Rivera V, Pannett B, Plato N, Savela A, Vincent R, Kogevinas M: Occupational exposure to carcinogens in the European Union. Occup Envir Med 2000, 57:10–18.

Eide GE, Gefeller O: Sequential and average attributable fractions as aids in the selection of preventive strategies. J Clin Epidemiol 1995, 48:645–655.

Eide GE, Gefeller O: Re: "Attributable risk in practice". Am J Epidemiol 2000, 151:208–212.

Morfeld P: Years of Life Lost due to exposure: Causal concepts and empirical shortcomings. Epidemiol Perspect Innov 2004, 1:5.

Brunekreef B, Miller BG, Hurley JF: The brave new world of lives sacrificed and saved, deaths attributed and avoided. Epidemiology 2007, 18:785–788.

Lopez AD: Competing Causes of Death. A Review of Recent Trends in Mortality in Industrialized Countries with Special Reference to Cancer. Annals of the NY Academy of Sciences 1990, 609:58–74. with discussion 74–76

Greenland S: Relation of probability of causation to relative risk and doubling dose: a methodologic error that has become a social problem. Am J Public Health 1999, 89:1166–1169.

Erren TC: Identifying research challenges for occupational and environmental medicine until 2030: an initiative. Occup Environ Med 2009, 66:5–6.