Attitudinal and consequential expectancies in behavioral decision making

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 6 - Trang 1-30 - 1982
William K. Gabrenya1, Bruce J. Biddle2
1School of Professional Psychology, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne
2University of Missouri-Columbia, USA

Tóm tắt

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the degree to which persons distinguish between what are termed “attitudinal” and “distant consequence” expectancies, the conditions under which consequential expectancies predict behavior, and the effects of conflicting attitudinal and consequential expectancies. Attitudinal expectancies are beliefs about the immediate hedonic outcomes of behaving; consequential expectancies are beliefs about distant, nonsocially mediated behavioral outcomes. A simulation experiment was conducted in which, in a 3×3 design, subjects either were or were not given attitudinal and consequential information about hypothetical behaviors that either favored or did not favor performing the behaviors. A second experiment extended the first by using a real rather than a hypothetical decision dilemma and by manipulating attitudinal (and social support) versus consequential expectancies in a 2×3 design. The results of the two studies were nearly identical in supporting the attitude-distant consequence distinction and in demonstrating that consequential considerations are an important antecedent of behavioral decisions. The implications of these findings and of the expectancy theory/decision-making approach to the development of a broad theory of action are discussed.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ajzen, I. Attitudinal vs. normative messages: An investigation of the differential effects of persuasive communications on behavior.Sociometry 1971,34 263–380. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. The prediction of behavioral intentions in a choice situation.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1969,5 400–416. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. Attitudes and normative beliefs as factors influencing behavioral intentions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1972,21 1–9. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M.Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1980. Anderson, N. H. Functional measurement and psychophysical judgment.Psychological Review 1970,78 153–170. Arkin, R. M. Self-presentation. In O. Wegner & R. Valicher (Eds.),The self in social psychology. London: Oxford University Press, 1980. Biddle, B. J.Role theory: Expectations, identities and behaviors. New York: Academic Press, 1979. Cacioppo, J. T., Harkins, S. G., & Petty, R. E. The nature of attitudes and their relationships to behavior. In R. Petty, T. Ostrom, & T. Brock (Eds.),Cognitive responses in persuasion: A test in attitude change. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1979. Carlson, A. P.The relationship between behavioral intention, attitude toward the behavior and normative beliefs about the behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1968. DeVries, D. L., & Ajzen, I. The relationship of attitudes and normative beliefs to cheating in college.Journal of Social Psychology 1971,83 199–207. Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgment and choice.Annual Review of Psychology 1981,32 53–88. Fazio, R. H., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency: An information processing analysis.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1978,4 48–51. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I.Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1975. Gabrenya, W. K., Jr., & Arkin, R. M. The effect of commitment on expectancy value and expectancy weight in social decision making.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1979,5 86–90. Isen, A. M., Shalker, T. E., Clark, M., & Karp, L. Affect, accessibility of material in memory, and behavior: A cognitive loop?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1978,36 1–17. Jaccard, J. Attitude and behavior: Implications of attitudes toward behavioral alternatives.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1981,17 286–307. Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. A.Decision making. New York: Free Press, 1977. Kanouse, D. E., & Hanson, L. R., Jr. Negativity in evaluations. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.),Attributions: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, New Jersey: General Learning Press, 1972. Kaplan, K. J., & Fishbein, M. The source of beliefs, their saliency, and prediction of attitude.Journal of Social Psychology 1969,78 63–74. Kelman, H. C. Further thoughts on the processes of compliance, identification, and internalization. In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.),Perspectives in social power. Chicago: Aldine, 1974. Komorita, S. S., & Bass, A. R. Attitude differentiation and evaluation scales of the semantic differential.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1967,6 241–244. Lingle, J. H., & Ostrom, T. M. Retrieval selectivity in memory-based impression judgments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979,37 180–194. Lynch, J. G., Jr. Why additive utility models fail as descriptors of choice behavior.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1979,15 397–417. Lynch, J. G., & Cohen, J. L. The use of subjective expected utility theory as an aid to understanding variables that influence helping behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1978,36 1138–1151. March, J. G. An introduction to the theory and measurement of influence.American Political Science Review 1955,49 431–451. Miniard, P. W., & Cohen, J. B. An examination of the Fishbein-Ajzen behavioral-intentions model's concepts and measures.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1981,17 309–339. Mischel, W. Cognitive appraisal and transformations in self-control. In B. Weiner (Ed.),Cognitive views of human motivation. New York: Academic Press, 1974. Mitchell, T. R., & Biglan, A. Instrumentality theories: Current uses in psychology.Psychological Review 1971,79 432–454. Neter, F., & Wasserman, W.Applied linear statistical models: Regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs. Homewood, Illinois: Irwin, 1974. Parducci, A. Range-frequency compromise in judgment.Psychological Monographs, 1963,77(2). Parsons, T.The social system. New York: Free Press, 1951. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Heesacker, M. Effects of rhetorical questions on persuasion: A cognitive response analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981,40 432–440. Price-Williams, D. R., & Ramirez, M., III. Ethnic differences in delay of gratification.Journal of Social Psychology 1974,93 23–30. Schwartz, S. H. Normative explanation of helping behavior: A critique, proposal, and empirical test.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1973,9 349–364. Schwartz, S. H. Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowtiz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10). New York: Academic Press, 1977. Schwartz, S. H., & Tessler, R. C. A test of a model for reducing measured attitude-behavior discrepancies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1972,24 225–236. Songer-Nocks, E. Situational factors affecting the weighting of predictor components in the Fishbein model.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1976,12 56–69. Tesser, A. Self-generated attitude change. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11). New York: Academic Press, 1978. Wicker, A. W. An examination of the “other variables” explanation of attitude-behavior inconsistency.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1971,19 18–30. Wyer, R. S., & Carlston, D. E.Social cognition, inference, and attribution. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1979.