Attitudes towards the male contraceptive pill: psychosocial and cultural explanations for delaying a marketable product
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Hoesl CE, Saad F, Pöppel M, et al (2005) Reversible, Non-Barrier Male Contraception: Status and Prospects. Eur Urol 48:712–723
Flood M (2003) Lust, trust and latex: Why young heterosexual men do not use condoms? Cult Health Sex 5:353–369
Manetti GJ, Honig SC (2010) Update on Male Hormonal Contraception: Is the vasectomy in jeopardy? Int J Impot Res 22:159–170
Liu PY, McLachlan RI (2008) Male hormonal contraception: so near and yet so far. J Clin Endocr Metab 93:2474–2476
Meriggiola MC, Cerpolini S, Bremner WJ, et al (2006) Acceptability of an injectable male contraceptive regimen of norethisterone enanthate and testosterone undecanoate for men. Hum Reprod 21:2033–2040
Solomon H, Yount KM, Mbizvo MT (2007) ’A shot of his own’: The acceptability of a male hormonal contraceptive in Indonesia. Cult Health Sex 9:1–14
Anderson RA, Bancroft J, Wu FC (1992) The effects of exogenous testosterone on sexuality and mood of normal men. J Clin Endocr Metab 75:1503–1507
Sjögren B, Gottlieb C (2001) Testosterone for male contraception during one year: attitudes, well-being and quality of sex life. Contraception 64:59–65
Brooks M (1998) Men’s views on male hormonal contraception — a survey of the views of attenders at a fitness centre in Bristol. Br J Fam Plann 24:7–17
Weston GC, Schlipalius ML, Vollenhoven BJ (2002) Migrant fathers and their attitudes to potential male hormonal contraceptives. Contraception 66:351–355
Eberhardt J, van Wersch A, Meikle N (2009) Attitudes towards the male contraceptive pill in men and women in casual and stable sexual relationships. J Fam Plan Reprod H 35:161–165
Anderson RA, Baird DT (1997) Progress towards a male pill. IPPF Med Bull 31:3–4
Martin CW, Anderson RA, Cheng L, et al (2000) Potential impact of hormonal male contraception: cross-cultural implications for development of novel preparations. Hum Reprod 15:637–645
Oudshoorn N (2003) The male pill: a biography of a technology in the making. Duke University Press, Durham and London
Amory JK, Page ST, Anawalt BD, et al (2007) Acceptability of a combination testosterone gel and depomedroxyprogesterone acetate male contraceptive regimen. Contraception 75:218–223
Matthiesson KL, McLachlan RI (2008) Male hormonal contraception: concept proven product in sight? Hum Reprod Update 12:463–482
Liu PY, Swerdloff RS, Wang C (2010) Recent methodological advances in male hormonal contraception. Contraception 82:471–475
Gu Y, Liang X, Wu W et al (2009) Multicenter contraceptive efficacy trial of injectable testosterone undecanoate in Chinese men. J Endocr Metab 94:1910–1915
Nieschlag E (2011) The struggle for male hormonal contraception. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 25:369–375
Heinemann K, Saad F, Wiesemes M, et al (2005) Attitudes toward male fertility control: results of a multinational survey on four continents. Hum Reprod 20:549–556
Glasier AF, Anakwe R, Everington D, et al (2000) Would women trust their partners to use a male pill? Hum Reprod 15:646–649
Reis TJ, Gerrard M, Gibbons FX (1993) Social comparison and the pill: reactions to upward and downward comparison of contraceptive behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 19:13–20
Ringheim K (1995) Evidence for the acceptability of an injectable hormonal method for men. Int Fam Plan Perspect 21:75–80
Walker S (2011) Attitudes to a male contraceptive pill in a group of contraceptive users in the UK. J Mens Health 8:267–273
O’Connor D, Ferguson E, O’Connor R (2005) Intentions to use hormonal male contraception: the role of message framing, attitudes and stress appraisals. Br J Psychol 96:351–369
Rothman AJ, Salovey P (1997) Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behaviour: the role of message framing. Psychol Bull 121:3–19
Van Wersch A (1998) Health and illness. In: Trew K, Kremer J (eds). Gender and Psychology. Arnolds Publishers, London, pp 167–179
Anderson RA, Kinniburgh D, Baird DT (2002) Suppression of spermatogenesis by etonogestrel implants with depot testosterone: potential for long-acting male contraception. J Clin Endocr Metab 87:3640–3649
Ringheim K (1993) Factors that determine prevalence of use of contraceptive methods for men. Stud Fam Plann 24:87–99
Ringheim K (1996) Whither methods for men? Emerging gender issues in contraception. Reprod Health Matter 7:79–89
Terry G, Braun V (2011) ’It’s kind of me taking responsibility for these things’: men, vasectomy and ‘contraceptive economies’. Fem Psychol 21:477–495
Bardwick J (1973) Psychological factors in the acceptance and use of oral contraceptives. In: Psychological perspectives on population. Basic Books, New York
Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation (1997) A new national survey on men’s role in preventing pregnancy. HJKFF, Menlo Park, California
Grady WR, Klepinger DH, Nelson-Wally E (1999) Contraceptive characteristics: the perceptions and priorities of men and women. Fam Plann Perspect 31:168–175
Kalampalakis N, Buschini F (2007) La contraception masculine médicalisée: enjeux psychosociaux et craintes imaginaires. Nouvelle Revue de Psychosociologie 2:89–104
O’Rand MG, Widgren EE, Hamil KG, et al (2011) Epididymal protein targets: a brief history of the development of epididymal protease inhibitor as a contraceptive. J Androl 32:698–704
Nieschlag E, Vorona E, Wenk M, et al (2011) Hormonal male contraception in men with normal and subnormal semen parameters. Int J Androl 34:556–567
Beck U, Beck-Gernsheim E (1995) The Normal Chaos of Love. Polity Press, Cambridge
Beck U, Beck-Gernsheim E (2002) Individualization. Sage, London
Giddens A (1991) Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age. Polity Press, Cambridge
Giddens A (1992) The transformation of intimacy: sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Polity Press, Cambridge
Stacey J (1990) Brave new families: stories of domestic upheaval in late twentieth century America. Basic Books, New York
Stacey J (1996) In the name of the family: rethinking family values in the postmodern age. Beacon Press, Boston