Attentional and perceptual biases of climate change

Cook, 2016, Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming, Environ Res Lett, 11, 10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002 Brenan, 2018, Global warming concern steady despite some partisan shifts, Gallup Pew Reaearch Center, 2017 Bromley-Trujillo, 2020, The importance of salience: public opinion and state policy action on climate change, J Public Policy, 40, 280, 10.1017/S0143814X18000375 Luo, 2019, Motivated attention in climate change perception and action, Front Psychol, 10, 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01541 Kahan, 2017, Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government, Behav Public Policy, 1, 54, 10.1017/bpp.2016.2 Nurse, 2020, I’ll see it when i believe it: motivated numeracy in perceptions of climate change risk, Environ Commun, 14, 184, 10.1080/17524032.2019.1618364 Whitman, 2018, Political orientation and climate concern shape visual attention to climate change, Clim Change, 147, 383, 10.1007/s10584-018-2147-9 Carlson, 2019, Climate change images produce an attentional bias associated with pro-environmental disposition, Cogn Process, 20, 385, 10.1007/s10339-019-00902-5 Carlson, 2020, Paying attention to climate change: positive images of climate change solutions capture attention, J Environ Psychol, 71, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101477 Mrkva, 2020, Attention increases environmental risk perception, J Exp Psychol Gen, 150, 83, 10.1037/xge0000772 Drummond, 2017, Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics.pdf, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 114, 9587, 10.1073/pnas.1704882114 Shi, 2016, Knowledge as a driver of public perceptions about climate change reassessed, Nat Clim Change, 6, 759, 10.1038/nclimate2997 van der Linden, 2015, The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: towards a comprehensive model, J Environ Psychol, 41, 112, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.012 Ehret, 2018, Partisan barriers to bipartisanship: understanding climate policy polarization, Soc Psychol Pers Sci, 9, 308, 10.1177/1948550618758709 Van Boven, 2018, Psychological barriers to bipartisan public support for climate policy, Perspect Psychol Sci, 13, 492, 10.1177/1745691617748966 Geiger, 2016, Climate of silence: pluralistic ignorance as a barrier to climate change discussion, J Environ Psychol, 47, 79, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.002 Landrum, 2017, Processing the papal encyclical through perceptual filters: Pope Francis, identity-protective cognition, and climate change concern, Cognition, 166, 1, 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.015 Hennes, 2016, Motivated recall in the service of the economic system: the case of anthropogenic climate change, J Exp Psychol Gen, 145, 755, 10.1037/xge0000148 Bolin, 2018, The News You Choose: news media preferences amplify views on climate change, Env Polit, 27, 455, 10.1080/09644016.2018.1423909 Newell, 2016, Managing the budget: stock-flow reasoning and the CO2 accumulation problem, Top Cogn Sci, 8, 138, 10.1111/tops.12176 Ranney, 2016, Climate change conceptual change: scientific information can transform attitudes, Top Cogn Sci, 8, 49, 10.1111/tops.12187 Wynes, 2020, How well do people understand the climate impact of individual actions?, Clim Change, 162, 1521, 10.1007/s10584-020-02811-5 Holmgren, 2018, Averaging bias in environmental impact estimates: Evidence from the negative footprint illusion, J Environ Psychol, 55, 48, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.12.005 Bain, 2016, Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world, Nat Clim Change, 6, 154, 10.1038/nclimate2814 Weber, 2017, Breaking cognitive barriers to a sustainable future, Nat Hum Behav, 1, 10.1038/s41562-016-0013 Bain, 2020, It’s not too late to do the right thing: moral motivations for climate change action, Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change, 11, 1, 10.1002/wcc.615 Hardisty, 2019, A carbon price by another name may seem sweeter: consumers prefer upstream offsets to downstream taxes, J Environ Psychol, 66, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101342 McCright, 2016, Examining the effectiveness of climate change frames in the face of a climate change denial counter-frame, Top Cogn Sci, 8, 76, 10.1111/tops.12171 Druckman, 2019, The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation, Nat Clim Change, 9, 111, 10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1 Harold, 2016, Cognitive and psychological science insights to improve climate change data visualization, Nat Clim Change, 6, 1080, 10.1038/nclimate3162 Camilleri, 2019, Consumers underestimate the emissions associated with food but are aided by labels, Nat Clim Change, 9, 53, 10.1038/s41558-018-0354-z Bosetti, 2017, COP21 climate negotiators’ responses to climate model forecasts, Nat Clim Change, 7, 185, 10.1038/nclimate3208 Wong-Parodi, 2020, Understanding and countering the motivated roots of climate change denial, Curr Opin Environ Sustain, 42, 60, 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.008 Goldberg, 2020, Perceived social consensus can reduce ideological biases on climate change, Environ Behav, 52, 495, 10.1177/0013916519853302 Guilbeault, 2018, Social learning and partisan bias in the interpretation of climate trends, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 115, 9714, 10.1073/pnas.1722664115 van der Linden, 2017, Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change, Glob Chall, 1 Cook, 2016, Rational irrationality: modeling climate change belief polarization using bayesian networks, Top Cogn Sci, 8, 160, 10.1111/tops.12186 Van Bavel, 2018, The partisan brain: an identity-based model of political belief, Trends Cogn Sci, 22, 213, 10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.004 Xie, 2019, Predicting climate change risk perception and willingness to act, J Environ Psychol, 65, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101331 Hornsey, 2016, Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change, Nat Clim Change, 6, 622, 10.1038/nclimate2943 Langenbach, 2020, Cognitive resources moderate the relationship between pro-environmental attitudes and green behavior, Environ Behav, 52, 979, 10.1177/0013916519843127 White, 2019, How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: a literature review and guiding framework, J Mark, 83, 22, 10.1177/0022242919825649 Nisa, 2019, Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials testing behavioural interventions to promote household action on climate change, Nat Commun, 10, 10.1038/s41467-019-12457-2