Attention as a source of variability in decision-making: Accounting for overall-value effects with diffusion models

Journal of Mathematical Psychology - Tập 105 - Trang 102594 - 2021
Blair R.K. Shevlin1, Ian Krajbich1,2
1The Ohio State University, Department of Psychology, Columbus OH 43210, USA
2The Ohio State University, Department of Economics, Columbus, OH 43210, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Amasino, 2019, Amount and time exert independent influences on intertemporal choice, Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 383, 10.1038/s41562-019-0537-2 Ando, 2007, Bayesian predictive information criterion for the evaluation of hierarchical Bayesian and empirical Bayes models, Biometrika, 94, 443, 10.1093/biomet/asm017 Armel, 2008, Biasing simple choices by manipulating relative visual attention, Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 396, 10.1017/S1930297500000413 Ashby, 2016, Finding the right fit: A comparison of process assumptions underlying popular drift-diffusion models, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 1982 Boehm, 2018, Estimating across-trial variability parameters of the diffusion decision model: Expert advice and recommendations, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 87, 46, 10.1016/j.jmp.2018.09.004 Bose, 2020, Frequency-sensitivity and magnitude-sensitivity in decision-making: Predictions of a theoretical model-based study, Computational Brain & Behavior, 3, 66, 10.1007/s42113-019-00031-4 Botvinick, 2001, Conflict monitoring and cognitive control, Psychological Review, 108, 624, 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624 Brunton, 2013, Rats and humans can optimally accumulate evidence for decision-making, Science, 340, 95, 10.1126/science.1233912 Cavanagh, 2019, Visual fixation patterns during economic choice reflect covert valuation processes that emerge with learning, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116, 22795, 10.1073/pnas.1906662116 Cavanagh, 2011, Subthalamic nucleus stimulation reverses mediofrontal influence over decision threshold, Nature Neuroscience, 14, 1462, 10.1038/nn.2925 Cavanagh, 2014, Eye tracking and pupillometry are indicators of dissociable latent decision processes, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1476, 10.1037/a0035813 Chabris, 2009, The allocation of time in decision-making, Journal of the European Economic Association, 7, 628, 10.1162/JEEA.2009.7.2-3.628 Chen, 2018, Biased sequential sampling underlies the effects of time pressure and delay in social decision making, Nature Communications, 9, 3557, 10.1038/s41467-018-05994-9 Clithero, 2018, Response times in economics: Looking through the lens of sequential sampling models, Journal of Economic Psychology, 69, 61, 10.1016/j.joep.2018.09.008 De Martino, 2013, Confidence in value-based choice, Nature Neuroscience, 16, 105, 10.1038/nn.3279 Diederich, 2003, MDFT account of decision making under time pressure, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 157, 10.3758/BF03196480 Dutilh, 2016, Comparing perceptual and preferential decision making, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 723, 10.3758/s13423-015-0941-1 Fiedler, 2015, Attention and moral behavior, Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 139, 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.08.008 Fisher, 2017, An attentional drift diffusion model over binary-attribute choice, Cognition, 168, 34, 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.007 Folke, 2016, Explicit representation of confidence informs future value-based decisions, Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 1, 10.1038/s41562-016-0002 Fontanesi, 2019, A reinforcement learning diffusion decision model for value-based decisions, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 1099, 10.3758/s13423-018-1554-2 Frömer, 2019, Spatiotemporally distinct neural mechanisms underlie our reactions to and comparison between value-based options, BioRxiv Ghaffari, 2018, The power of attention: Using eye gaze to predict other-regarding and moral choices, Psychological Science, 29, 1878, 10.1177/0956797618799301 Glickman, 2019, The formation of preference in risky choice, PLoS Computational Biology, 15, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007201 Gluth, 2020, Value-based attention but not divisive normalization influences decisions with multiple alternatives, Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 634, 10.1038/s41562-020-0822-0 Gluth, 2018, Value-based attentional capture affects multi-alternative decision making, ELife, 7, 10.7554/eLife.39659 Green, 2012, Changes in neural connectivity underlie decision threshold modulation for reward maximization, Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 14942, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0573-12.2012 Gwinn, 2019, The spillover effects of attentional learning on value-based choice, Cognition, 182, 294, 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.012 Hare, 2011, Transformation of stimulus value signals into motor commands during simple choice, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 18120, 10.1073/pnas.1109322108 Helfer, 2014, The effects of nutrition labeling on consumer food choice: A psychological experiment and computational model, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1331, 174, 10.1111/nyas.12461 Hunt, 2012, Mechanisms underlying cortical activity during value-guided choice, Nature Neuroscience, 15, 470, 10.1038/nn.3017 Hunt, 2018, Triple dissociation of attention and decision computations across prefrontal cortex, Nature Neuroscience, 21, 1471, 10.1038/s41593-018-0239-5 Jamieson, 1977, Preference and the time to choose, Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 19, 56, 10.1016/0030-5073(77)90054-X Johnson, 2016, A computational model of the attention process in risky choice, Decision, 3, 254, 10.1037/dec0000050 Konovalov, 2019, Revealed strength of preference: Inference from response times, Judgment and Decision Making, 14, 381, 10.1017/S1930297500006082 Konovalov, 2020, Mouse tracking reveals structure knowledge in the absence of model-based choice, Nature Communications, 11, 1893, 10.1038/s41467-020-15696-w Krajbich, 2019, Accounting for attention in sequential sampling models of decision making, Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 6, 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.10.008 Krajbich, 2010, Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice, Nature Neuroscience, 13, 1292, 10.1038/nn.2635 Kvam, 2016, Strength and weight: The determinants of choice and confidence, Cognition, 152, 170, 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.04.008 Lerche, 2017, How many trials are required for parameter estimation in diffusion modeling? A comparison of different optimization criteria, Behavior Research Methods, 49, 513, 10.3758/s13428-016-0740-2 Lim, 2011, The decision value computations in the vmpfc and striatum use a relative value code that is guided by visual attention, Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 13214, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1246-11.2011 McGinty, 2019, Overt attention toward appetitive cues enhances their subjective value, independent of orbitofrontal cortex activity, ENeuro, 6, 10.1523/ENEURO.0230-19.2019 McGinty, 2016, Orbitofrontal cortex value signals depend on fixation location during free viewing, Neuron, 90, 1299, 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.045 Merkel, 2019, Is fairness intuitive? An experiment accounting for subjective utility differences under time pressure, Experimental Economics, 22, 24, 10.1007/s10683-018-9566-3 Milosavljevic, 2010, The drift diffusion model can account for the accuracy and reaction time of value-based choices under high and low time pressure, Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 437, 10.1017/S1930297500001285 Newell, 2018, Perceptual but not complex moral judgments can be biased by exploiting the dynamics of eye-gaze, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147, 409, 10.1037/xge0000386 Pärnamets, 2015, Biasing moral decisions by exploiting the dynamics of eye gaze, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 4170, 10.1073/pnas.1415250112 Philiastides, 2013, Influence of branding on preference-based decision making, Psychological Science, 24, 1208, 10.1177/0956797612470701 Pirrone, 2018, Evidence for the speed–value trade-off: Human and monkey decision making is magnitude sensitive, Decision, 5, 129, 10.1037/dec0000075 Pirrone, 2018, Single-trial dynamics explain magnitude sensitive decision making, BMC Neuroscience, 19, 54, 10.1186/s12868-018-0457-5 Pisauro, 2017, Neural correlates of evidence accumulation during value-based decisions revealed via simultaneous EEG-fMRI, Nature Communications, 8, 15808, 10.1038/ncomms15808 Polanía, 2014, Neural oscillations and synchronization differentially support evidence accumulation in perceptual and value-based decision making, Neuron, 82, 709, 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.03.014 Ratcliff, 1978, A theory of memory retrieval, Psychological Review, 85, 59, 10.1037/0033-295X.85.2.59 Ratcliff, 2015, Individual differences and fitting methods for the two-choice diffusion model of decision making, Decision, 2, 237, 10.1037/dec0000030 Ratcliff, 2012, Reinforcement-based decision making in corticostriatal circuits: Mutual constraints by neurocomputational and diffusion models, Neural Computation, 24, 1186, 10.1162/NECO_a_00270 Ratcliff, 2008, The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks, Neural Computation, 20, 873, 10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420 Ratcliff, 2018, Modeling numerosity representation with an integrated diffusion model, Psychological Review, 125, 183, 10.1037/rev0000085 Ratcliff, 2004, A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time, Psychological Review, 111, 333, 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.333 Ratcliff, 2002, Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 438, 10.3758/BF03196302 Ratcliff, 2018, Internal and external sources of variability in perceptual decision-making, Psychological Review, 125, 33, 10.1037/rev0000080 Ratcliff, 2018, Modeling 2-alternative forced-choice tasks: Accounting for both magnitude and difference effects, Cognitive Psychology, 103, 1, 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.02.002 van Ravenzwaaij, 2017, The EZ diffusion model provides a powerful test of simple empirical effects, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 547, 10.3758/s13423-016-1081-y Rodriguez, 2014, Intertemporal choice as discounted value accumulation, PLoS One, 9, 10.1371/journal.pone.0090138 Roe, 2001, Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionst model of decision making, Psychological Review, 108, 370, 10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.370 Sepulveda, 2020, Visual attention modulates the integration of goal-relevant evidence and not value, ELife, 9, 10.7554/eLife.60705 Shenhav, 2013, The expected value of control: An integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function, Neuron, 79, 217, 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.007 Shenhav, 2014, Anterior cingulate engagement in a foraging context reflects choice difficulty, not foraging value, Nature Neuroscience, 17, 1249, 10.1038/nn.3771 Shimojo, 2003, Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference, Nature Neuroscience, 6, 1317, 10.1038/nn1150 Smith, 2018, Attention and choice across domains, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147, 1810, 10.1037/xge0000482 Smith, 2019, Estimating the dynamic role of attention via random utility, Journal of the Economic Science Association, 5, 97, 10.1007/s40881-019-00062-4 Smith, 2009, An integrated theory of attention and decision making in visual signal detection, Psychological Review, 116, 283, 10.1037/a0015156 Spiegelhalter, 2002, Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. Statistical Methodology, 64, 583, 10.1111/1467-9868.00353 Stewart, 2006, Decision by sampling, Cognitive Psychology, 53, 1, 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.003 Stewart, 2016, Eye movements in strategic choice, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29, 137, 10.1002/bdm.1901 Stewart, 2016, Eye movements in risky choice, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29, 116, 10.1002/bdm.1854 Sullivan, 2015, Dietary self-control is related to the speed with which attributes of healthfulness and tastiness are processed, Psychological Science, 26, 122, 10.1177/0956797614559543 Tavares, 2017, The attentional drift diffusion model of simple perceptual decision-making, Frontiers in Neuroscience, 11 Teodorescu, 2016, Absolutely relative or relatively absolute: Violations of value invariance in human decision making, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 22, 10.3758/s13423-015-0858-8 Thomas, 2019, Gaze bias differences capture individual choice behaviour, Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 625, 10.1038/s41562-019-0584-8 Towal, 2013, Simultaneous modeling of visual saliency and value computation improves predictions of economic choice, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, E3858 Tversky, 1979, Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, 47, 263, 10.2307/1914185 Vaidya, 2015, Testing necessary regional frontal contributions to value assessment and fixation-based updating, Nature Communications, 6, 10120, 10.1038/ncomms10120 Vassena, 2020, Surprise, value and control in anterior cingulate cortex during speeded decision-making, Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 412, 10.1038/s41562-019-0801-5 Von Neumann, 1944 Wagenmakers, 2010, BayesIan hypothesis testing for psychologists: A tutorial on the savage–dickey method, Cognitive Psychology, 60, 158, 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.12.001 Webb, 2018, The (neural) dynamics of stochastic choice, Management Science, 65, 230, 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2931 Westbrook, 2020, Dopamine promotes cognitive effort by biasing the benefits versus costs of cognitive work, Science, 367, 1362, 10.1126/science.aaz5891 Wiecki, 2013, Hddm: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the drift-diffusion model in python, Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7