Association Between Older Age and Increasing Gleason Score

Clinical Genitourinary Cancer - Tập 13 Số 6 - Trang 525-530.e3 - 2015
Vinayak Muralidhar1, David R. Ziehr2, Brandon A. Mahal2, Yu‐Wei Chen3, Michelle D. Nezolosky4, Vidya Viswanathan4, Toni K. Choueiri5, Christopher J. Sweeney5, Quoc‐Dien Trinh6, Paul L. Nguyen7
1Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
2Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
3Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
4Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
5Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
6Department of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
7Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. Electronic address: [email protected].

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Vicini, 2005, Limitations in the use of serum prostate specific antigen levels to monitor patients after treatment for prostate cancer, J Urol, 173, 1456

Wolf, 2010, American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010, CA Cancer J Clin, 60, 70, 10.3322/caac.20066

Carter, 2013, Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA guideline, J Urol, 190, 419

Andriole, 2009, Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial, N Engl J Med, 360, 1310, 10.1056/NEJMoa0810696

Schröder, 2009, Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study, N Engl J Med, 360, 1320, 10.1056/NEJMoa0810084

Thompson, 2006, Assessing prostate cancer risk: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial, J Natl Cancer Inst, 98, 529, 10.1093/jnci/djj131

Draisma, 2006, Gleason score, age and screening: modeling dedifferentiation in prostate cancer, Int J Cancer, 119, 2366, 10.1002/ijc.22158

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. SEER*Stat Database: Incidence—SEER 9 Regs Research Data, Nov 2013 Sub (1973-2011) <Katrina/Rita Population Adjustment>—Linked to County Attributes—Total US, 1969-2012 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch. Released April 2014, based on the November 2013 submission. Available at: http://www.seer.cancer.gov. Accessed November 22, 2014.

National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Prostate Cancer. 2015. Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp. Accessed November 22, 2014.

Curtin, 1998, Multiple correlations and Bonferroni's correction, Biol Psychiatry, 44, 775, 10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00043-2

Cuzick, 1985, A Wilcoxon-type test for trend, Stat Med, 4, 87, 10.1002/sim.4780040112

Epstein, 2001, Dedifferentiation of prostate cancer grade with time in men followed expectantly for stage T1c disease, J Urol, 166, 1688

Alibhai, 2004, The association between patient age and prostate cancer stage and grade at diagnosis, BJU Int, 94, 303, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04883.x

Bechis, 2011, Impact of age at diagnosis on prostate cancer treatment and survival, J Clin Oncol, 29, 235, 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.2075

Gandaglia, 2014, The effect of age at diagnosis on prostate cancer mortality: a grade-for-grade and stage-for-stage analysis, Eur J Surg Oncol, 40, 1706, 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.05.001

Borek, 1990, Relationship of age to histologic grade in prostate cancer, Prostate, 16, 305, 10.1002/pros.2990160405

Smedley, 1983, Age and survival in prostatic carcinoma, Br J Urol, 55, 529, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1983.tb03363.x

Cher, 1995, Screening for prostate cancer, West J Med, 162, 235

Moyer, 2012, Screening for prostate cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement, Ann Intern Med, 157, 120, 10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459

Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, et al. Guidelines on prostate cancer. Updated 2013. European Association of Urology. Available at: http://www.uroweb.org/guidelines/online-guidelines. Accessed November 22, 2014.

Heidenreich, 2013, Early detection of prostate cancer: European Association of Urology recommendation, Eur Urol, 64, 347, 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.051

Aslani, 2014, The impact of recent screening recommendations on prostate cancer screening in a large health care system, J Urol, 191, 1737

Ross, 2012, Impact of the 2008 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation to discontinue prostate cancer screening among male Medicare beneficiaries, Arch Intern Med, 172, 1601, 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3726

Penney, 2013, Gleason grade progression is uncommon, Cancer Res, 73, 5163, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0427

Kapoor, 2013, Utilization trends and positive biopsy rates for prostate biopsies in the United States: 2005 to 2011, Rev Urol, 15, 137

Epstein, 2005, The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma, Am J Surg Pathol, 29, 1228, 10.1097/01.pas.0000173646.99337.b1

Epstein, 2010, An update of the Gleason grading system, J Urol, 183, 433

Billis, 2006, Are prostate carcinoma clinical stages T1c and T2 similar?, Int Braz J Urol, 32, 165, 10.1590/S1677-55382006000200006

Armatys, 2005, Is it necessary to separate clinical stage T1c from T2 prostate adenocarcinoma?, BJU Int, 96, 777, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05713.x