Association Between Isokinetic Knee Strength and Perceived Function and Patient Satisfaction With Sports and Recreational Ability After Matrix-Induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation

Jay R. Ebert1, Anne Smith2, Gregory C. Janes3, David Wood4
1School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Science), University of Western Australia, Crawley, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
2School of Physiotherapy and Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Bentley, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
3Perth Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Centre, West Perth, Western Australia, Australia
4School of Surgery (Orthopaedics), University of Western Australia, Crawley, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Tóm tắt

Background:

Returning to a sound level of activity after matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) is important to patients. Evaluating the patient’s level of satisfaction with his or her sports and recreational ability is critical.

Purpose:

To investigate (1) satisfaction with sports and recreational ability after MACI and (2) the role that knee strength plays in self-reported knee function and satisfaction.

Study Design:

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Isokinetic knee strength was assessed in 97 patients at 1, 2, and 5 years after MACI to calculate hamstrings-quadriceps ratios and peak knee extensor and flexor torque limb symmetry indices (LSIs). The Sports and Recreation subscale of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS Sports/Rec) was completed. A satisfaction scale was used to evaluate how satisfied the patients were with their ability to return to recreational activities and their ability to participate in sport. Associations between knee strength LSI, KOOS Sports/Rec, and satisfaction with recreational and sporting activities were assessed through use of multivariable linear and logistic regression, with adjustment for confounders. Mediation analysis was conducted to assess the extent to which self-reported knee function mediated associations between strength LSI and satisfaction.

Results:

Satisfaction with the ability to return to recreational activities was achieved in 82.4%, 85.6%, and 85.9% of patients at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively, and satisfaction with sports participation was achieved in 55.7%, 73.2%, and 68.5% of patients at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. Knee extension torque LSIs were associated with KOOS Sports/Rec after adjustment for confounders over 1, 2, and 5 years (5-year regression coefficient, 6.0 points; 95% CI, 1.4-10.7; P = .012). KOOS Sports/Rec was associated with the likelihood of being satisfied at all time points (recreation: 5-year adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.26; 95% CI, 1.48-3.46; P < .001; and sports: 5-year adjusted OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.47-2.68; P < .001). In a multivariable mediation model, the knee extension torque LSI was associated with satisfaction directly (standardized coefficient, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03-0.28; P = .017) and indirectly via KOOS Sports/Rec (standardized coefficient, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.01-0.38; P = .027), the latter representing 55% of the total association of knee extension torque LSI with satisfaction.

Conclusion:

Knee extensor symmetry was associated with satisfaction in recreational and sporting ability, both directly and indirectly, via self-reported sports and recreation–related knee function. Restoring strength deficits after MACI is important for achieving optimal outcomes.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1002/art.24066

10.1016/j.arthro.2016.01.035

10.1136/bjsports-2014-093842

10.1177/0363546511422999

10.1136/bjsports-2013-093398

10.1177/0363546513489284

10.1177/0363546514563282

10.1136/bjsm.2010.076364

10.1177/0363546510384798

10.1007/s00167-004-0518-4

10.1007/s11136-009-9450-x

10.1186/s40064-016-1804-6

10.1302/0301-620X.87B5.15905

10.1007/s00167-009-1028-1

10.1016/j.knee.2011.06.005

10.1016/j.knee.2006.02.012

10.1016/j.joca.2009.04.019

10.1177/0363546518756976

10.4085/1062-6050-313-16

10.1016/j.arthro.2015.08.028

10.5792/ksrr.2016.28.1.1

10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

10.1016/j.arthro.2017.01.049

10.1007/s10195-005-0078-5

10.1177/0363546509348490

10.1016/j.arthro.2011.12.022

10.1177/1947603510380902

10.1177/0363546512445167

10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.01.006

10.1016/j.joca.2008.03.010

10.1177/1947603510362907

10.1177/0363546510390476

10.1123/JSR.2014-0159

10.1177/2325967118797575

10.1136/bjsports-2013-092642

10.1007/s00264-012-1690-7

10.1016/j.arthro.2013.05.015

10.1016/j.arthro.2013.12.023

10.1016/j.arthro.2013.05.027

10.2106/JBJS.N.00811

10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002525

10.1016/j.arthro.2009.12.030

10.2519/jospt.2013.4514

10.1177/1947603512470684

10.1007/s001670050106

10.2519/jospt.1997.26.4.184

10.2106/00004623-200209000-00008

10.1177/0363546511403279

Lee DY, 2008, Ann Acad Med Singapore, 37, 273, 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V37N4p273

Mahomed N, 2011, Arthritis, 591253, 2011

Mattacola CG, 2002, J Athl Train, 37, 262

10.1016/j.arthro.2013.11.001

10.1177/0363546509351650

10.1177/0363546515589167

10.1177/036354659101900518

10.1186/ar2180

10.1177/0363546509357915

10.1111/j.1600-0838.1995.tb00006.x

10.1016/j.knee.2006.11.009

10.1177/1947603510391084

10.2519/jospt.1998.28.2.88

10.1177/0363546514528093

10.1177/0363546509350694

10.1007/s11999-014-3561-6

Tegner Y, 1985, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 43

10.1007/s00167-011-1669-8

10.1007/s00167-012-1912-y

10.1177/0363546509351272

10.1177/0363546512462382

10.1177/0363546508322897