Assessment of vulnerability to waterlogging in subway stations using integrated EWM-TOPSIS
Tóm tắt
Waterlogging in subway stations has a devastating impact on normal operation of important urban facilities and can cause harm to passengers and property. It is difficult to assess the vulnerability of metro stations to waterlogging because many complex factors are involved. This study proposes a hybrid model to assess the vulnerability of subway stations to waterlogging by integrating the entropy weight method (EWM) with a technique for order preference based on similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS) (the EWM-TOPSIS method). The model is based on analysis of factors influencing the vulnerability of subway stations to waterlogging. The proposed method was applied to a field case (Jinshahu station in Hangzhou, found to be vulnerable to waterlogging at level IV). The results from EWM-TOPSIS, EWM, and TOPSIS were compared. The results using the EWM-TOPSIS method were more accurate and reliable than those using EWM and TOPSIS. However, the reliability of EWM-TOPSIS was determined based on historical data, which cannot capture rapidly changing factors. Based on the assessment results, recommendations were made to promote the overall health and development of urban areas to satisfy the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 11 (SDG11).
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abdrabo KI, Kantoush SA, Esmaiel A, Saber M, Sumi T, Almamari M, Elboshy B, Ghoniem S (2023) An integrated indicator-based approach for constructing an urban flood vulnerability index as an urban decision-making tool using the PCA and AHP techniques: A case study of Alexandria, Egypt. Urban Climate 48(2023): 101426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101426
Alizadeh H, Moshfeghi V (2023) Spatial analysis of urban water vulnerability in cities vulnerable to climate change: a study in Ahvaz. Iran Int J Environ Sci Technol 20(9):9587–9602. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13762-023-05032-2
AtanganaNjock PG, Shen SL, Zhou A (2023) Characterization of likelihood of gas hydrates occurrence in the South China Sea based on Bonferroni mean-based TOPSIS and fuzzy set theory. Geosci Front 14(2023):101513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2022.101513
Benito G, Ouarda TBMJ, Bárdossy A (2005) Applications of palaeoflood hydrology and historical data in flood risk analysis. J Hydrol 313(2005):1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.02.001
Cai T, Li XY, Ding X, Jia WG, Jian ZH (2019) Flood risk assessment based on hydrodynamic model and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation with GIS technique. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 35(2019): 101077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101077
Chen YL, Shen SL, Zhou A (2022) Assessment of red tide risk by integrating CRITIC weight method, TOPSIS-ASSETS method, and Monte Carlo simulation. Environ Pollut 314(2022): 120254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120254
Dinçer H, Yüksel S, Aksoy T, Hacıoğlu Ü (2022) Application of M-SWARA and TOPSIS Methods in the Evaluation of Investment Alternatives of Microgeneration Energy Technologies. Sustainability 14(10):6271. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106271
Dong QX, Cooper O (2016) An orders-of-magnitude AHP supply chain risk assessment framework. Int J Prod Econ 182(2016):144–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.021
EsmatkhahIrani A, Azadi A, Nikbakht M, Azarafza M, HajialilueBonab M, BehroozSarand F (2022) GIS-based settlement risk assessment and its effect on surface structures: a case study for the Tabriz metro—line 1. Geotech Geol Eng 40(10):5081–5102. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10706-022-02201-X
Foroozesh F, Monavari SM, Salmanmahiny A, Robati M, Rahimi R (2022) Assessment of sustainable urban development based on a hybrid decision-making approach: Group fuzzy BWM, AHP, and TOPSIS–GIS. Sustain Cities Soc 76(2022):103402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103402
Ghosh A, Kar SK (2018) Application of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for flood risk assessment: a case study in Malda district of West Bengal. India Natural Hazards 94(1):349–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3392-y
Jiang WG, Deng L, Chen LY, Wu JJ, Li J (2009) Risk assessment and validation of flood disaster based on fuzzy mathematics. Prog Nat Sci 19(10):1419–1425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.12.010
Kittipongvises S, Phetrak A, Rattanapun P, Brundiers K, Buizer JL, Melnick R (2020) AHP-GIS analysis for flood hazard assessment of the communities nearby the world heritage site on Ayutthaya Island, Thailand. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 48(2020): 101612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101612
Koulinas GK, Demesouka OE, Marhavilas PK, Vavatsikos AP, Koulouriotis DE (2019) Risk Assessment Using Fuzzy TOPSIS and PRAT for Sustainable Engineering Projects. Sustainability 11(3):615. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030615
Lei XY, Chen Y, Pan XJ, Zhang L, Li Y, Hu TG (2019) Risk Zonation of Rainstorm Flooding Disaster in Hangzhou Main City Zone. J Hangzhou Normal Univ 18(1): 105–112. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-232X.2019.01.019
Leveque B, Burnet JB, Dorner S, Bichai F (2021) Impact of climate change on the vulnerability of drinking water intakes in a northern region. Sustain Cities Soc 66(2021): 102656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102656
Li GF, Yang YF, Li S, Qu XD, Lyu NC, Eben L, SB (2022) Decision making of autonomous vehicles in lane change scenarios: Deep reinforcement learning approaches with risk awareness. Transport Res Part C Emerg Technol 134(2022): 103452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103452
Lin SS, Shen SL, Zhou A, Xu YS (2020) Approach based on TOPSIS and Monte Carlo simulation methods to evaluate lake eutrophication levels. Water Res 187(2020):116437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116437
Lin SS, Zhou A, Shen SL (2023) Safety assessment of excavation system via TOPSIS-based MCDM modelling in fuzzy environment. Appl Soft Comput 138(2023):110206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110206
Ma CX, Peng FL, Qiao YK, Li H (2022) Evaluation of spatial performance of metro-led urban underground public space: A case study in Shanghai. Tunnelling Underground Space Technol 124(2022): 104484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104484
NaitAicha A, Englebienne G, Van Schooten KS, Pijnappels M, Kröse B (2018) Deep Learning to Predict Falls in Older Adults Based on Daily-Life Trunk Accelerometry. Sensors 18(5):1654. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051654
Paltrinieri N, Comfort L, Reniers G (2019) Learning about risk: Machine learning for risk assessment. Saf Sci 118(2019):475–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.001
Priest SJ, Parker DJ, Hurford AP, Walker J, Evans K (2011) Assessing options for the development of surface water flood warning in England and Wales. J Environ Manage 92(12):3038–3048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.041
Quan RS (2014) Rainstorm waterlogging risk assessment in central urban area of Shanghai based on multiple scenario simulation. Nat Hazards 73(3):1569–1585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1156-x
Shen SL, Lin SS, Zhou A (2023) A cloud model-based approach for risk analysis of excavation system. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 231(2023):108984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108984
Shi YJ, Zhai GF, Zhou ST, Lu YW, Chen W, Deng JY (2019) How Can Cities Respond to Flood Disaster Risks under Multi-Scenario Simulation? A Case Study of Xiamen, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(4):618–618. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16040618
Song JY, Chung ES (2016) Robustness, uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of the TOPSIS method for quantitative climate change vulnerability: A case study of flood damage. Water Resour Manage 30(13):4751–4771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1451-2
Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX, Luers A, Martello ML, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8074–8079. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231335100
Wang ZL, Lai CG, Chen XH, Yang B, Zhao SW, Bai XY (2015) Flood hazard risk assessment model based on random forest. J Hydrol 527(2015):1130–1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.008
Wright SN, Novakowski KS (2019) Groundwater recharge, flow and stable isotope attenuation in sedimentary and crystalline fractured rocks: Spatiotemporal monitoring from multi-level wells. J Hydrol 571(2019):178–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.01.028
Wu H, Wang JW, Liu S, Yang TY (2020) Research on decision-making of emergency plan for waterlogging disaster in subway station project based on linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy set and TOPSIS. Math Biosci Eng 17(5):4825–4851. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2020263
Xiao XM, Jia LM, Wang YH (2018) Correlation between heterogeneity and vulnerability of subway networks based on passenger flow. J Rail Transport Plann Manage 8(2):145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2018.03.004
Yang H, Zhao LS, Chen J (2022) Metro system inundation in Zhengzhou Henan Province, China. Sustainability 14(15):9292. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159292
Yazdi M (2018) Risk assessment based on novel intuitionistic fuzzy-hybrid-modified TOPSIS approach. Safety Sci 110(a): 438–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.03.005
Yu HY, Liang C, Li P, Niu KJ, Du FX, Shao JH, Liu YY (2019) Evaluation of Waterlogging Risk in an Urban Subway Station. Adv Civil Eng 2019:5393171. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5393171
Zhang ML, Xu MH, Wang ZL, Lai CG (2021) Assessment of the vulnerability of road networks to urban waterlogging based on a coupled hydrodynamic model. J Hydrol 603(2021): 127105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127105
Zhang QY, Xu PP, Chen J, Qian H, Qu WG, Liu R (2021) Evaluation of groundwater quality using an integrated approach of set pair analysis and variable fuzzy improved model with binary semantic analysis: A case study in Jiaokou Irrigation District, east of Guanzhong Basin China. Sci Total Environ 767(2021):145247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145247
Zhang ZH, Zhang SB, Hu CT, Zhang XX, Yang SW, Yan HW, Zhang Z (2023) Hazard assessment model of ground subsidence coupling AHP, RS and GIS – A case study of Shanghai. Gondwana Res 117(2023):344–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.01.014
Zheng Q, Shen SL, Zhou A, Lyu HM (2022) Inundation risk assessment based on G-DEMATEL-AHP and its application to Zhengzhou flooding disaster. Sustain Cities Soc. 86(2022): 104138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104138
Zhou ZP, Liu S, Qi HN (2022) Mitigating subway construction collapse risk using Bayesian network modeling. Autom Construct 143(2022): 104541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104541
Zhu YX, Tian DZ, Yan F (2020) Effectiveness of Entropy Weight Method in Decision-Making. Math Probl Eng 5(2020):3564835. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3564835
Zou ZH, Yun Y, Sun JN (2006) Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment. J Environ Sci 18(5):1020–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(06)60032-6