Assessment of upper extremity impairment, function, and activity after stroke: foundations for clinical decision making
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Swinkels, 2011, Current use and barriers and facilitators for implementation of standardised measures in physical therapy in the Netherlands, BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 12, 106, 10.1186/1471-2474-12-106
Potter, 2011, Outcome measures in neurological physical therapy practice: Part I. Making sound decisions, J Neurol Phys Ther, 35, 57, 10.1097/NPT.0b013e318219a51a
Jette, 2009, Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: perceptions and applications, Phys Ther, 89, 125, 10.2522/ptj.20080234
Sathian, 2011, Neurological principles and rehabilitation of action disorders: common clinical deficits, Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 25, 21S, 10.1177/1545968311410941
Rosenfalck, 1980, Impaired regulation of force and firing pattern of single motor units in patients with spasticity, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 43, 907, 10.1136/jnnp.43.10.907
Young, 1982, Physiological alterations of motor units in hemiplegia, J Neurol Sci, 54, 401, 10.1016/0022-510X(82)90203-9
Jakobsson, 1992, Motoneuron activity and muscle fibre type composition in hemiparesis, Scand J Rehabil Med, 24, 115, 10.2340/1650197799224115119
Gemperline, 1995, Characteristics of motor unit discharge in subjects with hemiparesis, Muscle Nerve, 18, 1101, 10.1002/mus.880181006
Frontera, 1997, Firing rate of the lower motoneuron and contractile properties of its muscle fibers after upper motoneuron lesion in man, Muscle Nerve, 20, 938, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199708)20:8<938::AID-MUS2>3.0.CO;2-7
McComas, 1973, Functional changes in motoneurones of hemiparetic patients, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 36, 183, 10.1136/jnnp.36.2.183
Hammond, 1988, Co-contraction in the hemiparetic forearm: quantitative EMG evaluation, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 69, 348
Gowland, 1992, Agonist and antagonist activity during voluntary upper-limb movement in patients with stroke, Phys Ther, 72, 624, 10.1093/ptj/72.9.624
Fellows, 1994, Voluntary movement at the elbow in spastic hemiparesis, Ann Neurol, 36, 397, 10.1002/ana.410360311
Kamper, 2001, Impairment of voluntary control of finger motion following stroke: role of inappropriate muscle coactivation, Muscle Nerve, 24, 673, 10.1002/mus.1054
Bourbonnais, 1989, Weakness in patients with hemiparesis, Am J Occup Ther, 43, 313, 10.5014/ajot.43.5.313
Dewald, 1995, Abnormal muscle coactivation patterns during isometric torque generation at the elbow and shoulder in hemiparetic subjects, Brain, 118, 495, 10.1093/brain/118.2.495
Sahrmann, 1977, The relationship of voluntary movement to spasticity in the upper motor neuron syndrome, Ann Neurol, 2, 460, 10.1002/ana.410020604
Dietz, 1986, Motor unit involvement in spastic paresis. Relationship between leg muscle activation and histochemistry, J Neurol Sci, 75, 89, 10.1016/0022-510X(86)90052-3
Boissy, 1999, Maximal grip force in chronic stroke subjects and its relationship to global upper extremity function, Clin Rehabil, 13, 354, 10.1191/026921599676433080
Boissy, 1997, Characterization of global synkineses during hand grip in hemiparetic patients, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 78, 1117, 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90138-6
Lang, 2004, Reduced muscle selectivity during individuated finger movements in humans after damage to the motor cortex or corticospinal tract, J Neurophysiol, 91, 1722, 10.1152/jn.00805.2003
Lang, 2005, Deficits in grasp versus reach during acute hemiparesis, Exp Brain Res, 166, 126, 10.1007/s00221-005-2350-6
Lang, 2006, Recovery of grasp versus reach in people with hemiparesis poststroke, Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 20, 444, 10.1177/1545968306289299
Beebe, 2008, Absence of a proximal to distal gradient of motor deficits in the upper extremity early after stroke, Clin Neurophysiol, 119, 2074, 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.04.293
Beebe, 2009, Active range of motion predicts upper extremity function 3 months after stroke, Stroke, 40, 1772, 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.536763
Schieber, 2001, Constraints on somatotopic organization in the primary motor cortex, J Neurophysiol, 86, 2125, 10.1152/jn.2001.86.5.2125
Lemon, 2005, Comparing the function of the corticospinal system in different species: organizational differences for motor specialization?, Muscle Nerve, 32, 261, 10.1002/mus.20333
Schieber, 2009, Selective activation of human finger muscles after stroke or amputation, Adv Exp Med Biol, 629, 559, 10.1007/978-0-387-77064-2_30
Twitchell, 1951, The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia in man, Brain, 74, 443, 10.1093/brain/74.4.443
Lang, 2007, Relating movement control at 9 upper extremity segments to loss of hand function in people with chronic hemiparesis, Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 21, 279, 10.1177/1545968306296964
Bohannon, 1987, Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth Scale of muscle spasticity, Phys Ther, 67, 206, 10.1093/ptj/67.2.206
Fredericks, 1996, Disorders of the peripheral nervous system: the peripheral neuropathies, 346
Hreib, 2005, Clinical neurologic evaluation, 2
Winward, 1999, Current practice and clinical relevance of somatosensory assessment after stroke, Clin Rehabil, 13, 48, 10.1191/026921599701532126
Kent, 1965, Sensory-motor testing: the upper limb of adult patients with hemiplegia, Phys Ther, 45, 550, 10.1093/ptj/45.6.550
Lang, 2009, Recovery of thumb and finger extension and its relation to grasp performance after stroke, J Neurophysiol, 102, 451, 10.1152/jn.91310.2008
Prager, 2012, Predictive ability of 2-day measurement of active range of motion on 3-mo upper extremity motor function in people with post-stroke hemiparesis, Am J Occup Ther, 66, 1, 10.5014/ajot.2012.002683
Bland, 2008, Restricted active range of motion at the elbow, forearm, wrist, or fingers decreases hand function, J Hand Ther, 21, 268, 10.1197/j.jht.2008.01.003
Kwakkel, 2004, Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories, Restor Neurol Neurosci, 22, 281
Baker, 2011, Outcome measurement in stroke: a scale selection strategy, Stroke, 42, 1787, 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.608505
Ashford, 2008, Evaluation of functional outcome measures for the hemiparetic upper limb: a systematic review, J Rehabil Med, 40, 787, 10.2340/16501977-0276
Connell, 2012, Clinical reality of measuring upper-limb ability in neurologic conditions: a systematic review, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 93, 221, 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.09.015
Lyle, 1981, A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research, Int J Rehabil Res, 4, 483, 10.1097/00004356-198112000-00001
Hsieh, 1998, Inter-rater reliability and validity of the action research arm test in stroke patients, Age Ageing, 27, 107, 10.1093/ageing/27.2.107
Hsieh, 2009, Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation, Stroke, 40, 1386, 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.530584
Lang, 2008, Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 89, 1693, 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.02.022
Lang, 2006, Measurement of upper-extremity function early after stroke: properties of the action research arm test, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 87, 1605, 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.09.003
Nijland, 2010, A comparison of two validated tests for upper limb function after stroke: the Wolf Motor Function Test and the Action Research Arm Test, J Rehabil Med, 42, 694, 10.2340/16501977-0560
van der Lee, 2002, Improving the action research arm test: a unidimensional hierarchical scale, Clin Rehabil, 16, 646, 10.1191/0269215502cr534oa
van der Lee, 2004, Clinimetric properties of the motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients, Stroke, 35, 1410, 10.1161/01.STR.0000126900.24964.7e
van der Lee, 2001, The responsiveness of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment scale in chronic stroke patients, J Rehabil Med, 33, 110, 10.1080/165019701750165916
van der Lee, 2001, The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 82, 14, 10.1053/apmr.2001.18668
Platz, 2005, Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer test, action research arm test and box and block test: a multicentre study, Clin Rehabil, 19, 404, 10.1191/0269215505cr832oa
Mathiowetz, 1985, Adult norms for the box and block test of manual dexterity, Am J Occup Ther, 39, 386, 10.5014/ajot.39.6.386
Desrosiers, 1994, Validation of the box and block test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: reliability, validity, and norms studies, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 75, 751, 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90130-9
Lin, 2010, Responsiveness and validity of three dexterous function measures in stroke rehabilitation, J Rehabil Res Dev, 47, 563, 10.1682/JRRD.2009.09.0155
Barreca, 2004, Development of the Chedoke Arm And Hand Activity Inventory: theoretical constructs, item generation, and selection, Top Stroke Rehabil, 11, 31, 10.1310/JU8P-UVK6-68VW-CF3W
Barreca, 2006, Validation of three shortened versions of the Chedoke Arm And Hand Activity Inventory, Physiother Can, 58, 1, 10.3138/ptc.58.2.148
Barreca, 2005, Test-retest reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Chedoke Arm And Hand Activity Inventory: a new measure of upper-limb function for survivors of stroke, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 86, 1616, 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.017
Barreca, 2006, Comparing 2 versions of the Chedoke Arm And Hand Activity Inventory with the action research arm test, Phys Ther, 86, 245, 10.1093/ptj/86.2.245
Jebsen, 1969, An objective and standardized test of hand function, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 50, 311
Mathiowetz, 1985, Adult norms for the nine hole peg test of finger dexterity, Occup Ther J Res, 5, 24, 10.1177/153944928500500102
Croarkin, 2004, Evidence-based rating of upper-extremity motor function tests used for people following a stroke, Phys Ther, 84, 62, 10.1093/ptj/84.1.62
Sunderland, 1989, Arm function after stroke. An evaluation of grip strength as a measure of recovery and a prognostic indicator, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 52, 1267, 10.1136/jnnp.52.11.1267
Heller, 1987, Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 50, 714, 10.1136/jnnp.50.6.714
Wolf, 2001, Assessing wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke, Stroke, 32, 1635, 10.1161/01.STR.32.7.1635
Morris, 2001, The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 82, 750, 10.1053/apmr.2001.23183
Whitall, 2006, Psychometric properties of a modified wolf motor function test for people with mild and moderate upper-extremity hemiparesis, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 87, 656, 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.004
Fritz, 2009, Minimal detectable change scores for the wolf motor function test, Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 23, 662, 10.1177/1545968309335975
Wu, 2011, Assessing the streamlined wolf motor function test as an outcome measure for stroke rehabilitation, Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 25, 194, 10.1177/1545968310381249
Wolf, 2005, The excite trial: attributes of the wolf motor function test in patients with subacute stroke, Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 19, 194, 10.1177/1545968305276663
Lin, 2009, Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in stroke patients, Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 23, 429, 10.1177/1545968308331144
Uswatte, 2006, The motor activity log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke, Neurology, 67, 1189, 10.1212/01.wnl.0000238164.90657.c2
Uswatte, 2005, Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity motor activity log-14 for measuring real-world arm use, Stroke, 36, 2493, 10.1161/01.STR.0000185928.90848.2e
Dromerick, 2006, Relationships between upper-limb functional limitation and self-reported disability three months after stroke, J Rehabil Res Dev, 43, 401, 10.1682/JRRD.2005.04.0075
Duncan, 1999, Development of a comprehensive assessment toolbox for stroke, Clin Geriatr Med, 15, 885, 10.1016/S0749-0690(18)30037-5
Duncan, 2003, Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the stroke impact scale, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 84, 950, 10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00035-2
Duncan, 2002, Evaluation of proxy responses to the stroke impact scale, Stroke, 33, 2593, 10.1161/01.STR.0000034395.06874.3E
Duncan, 2002, Performance of a mail-administered version of a stroke-specific outcome measure, the stroke impact scale, Clin Rehabil, 16, 493, 10.1191/0269215502cr510oa
Duncan, 2001, Conceptualization of a new stroke-specific outcome measure: the stroke impact scale, Top Stroke Rehabil, 8, 19, 10.1310/BRHX-PKTA-0TUJ-UYWT
Lai, 2002, Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the stroke impact scale, Stroke, 33, 1840, 10.1161/01.STR.0000019289.15440.F2
Lin, 2010, Psychometric comparisons of the stroke impact scale 3.0 and stroke-specific quality of life scale, Qual Life Res, 19, 435, 10.1007/s11136-010-9597-5
Lin, 2010, Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the stroke impact scale in stroke patients, Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 24, 486, 10.1177/1545968309356295
Lin, 2009, Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke, Phys Ther, 89, 840, 10.2522/ptj.20080285
Beebe, 2009, Relationships and responsiveness of six upper extremity function tests during the first six months of recovery after stroke, J Neurol Phys Ther, 33, 96, 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181a33638
Yozbatiran, 2008, A standardized approach to performing the action research arm test, Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 22, 78, 10.1177/1545968307305353
Jobe, 2000, Cognitive processes in self-report, 25
Bradburn, 1987, Answering autobiographical questions: the impact of memory and inference on surveys, Science, 236, 157, 10.1126/science.3563494
Tatemichi, 1994, Cognitive impairment after stroke: frequency, patterns, and relationship to functional abilities, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 57, 202, 10.1136/jnnp.57.2.202
Prince, 2008, A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review, Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 5, 56, 10.1186/1479-5868-5-56
Rand, 2009, How active are people with stroke?: use of accelerometers to assess physical activity, Stroke, 40, 163, 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.523621
Green, 2007, Assessment of habitual physical activity and paretic arm mobility among stroke survivors by accelerometry, Top Stroke Rehabil, 14, 9, 10.1310/tsr1406-9
Chen, 2005, The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: current and future, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 37, S490, 10.1249/01.mss.0000185571.49104.82
Uswatte, 2000, Objective measurement of functional upper-extremity movement using accelerometer recordings transformed with a threshold filter, Stroke, 31, 662, 10.1161/01.STR.31.3.662
Welk, 2004, Reliability of accelerometry-based activity monitors: a generalizability study, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 36, 1637
Welk, 2005, Principles of design and analyses for the calibration of accelerometry-based activity monitors, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 37, S501, 10.1249/01.mss.0000185660.38335.de
Uswatte, 2005, Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: an objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 86, 1498, 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.01.010
Uswatte, 2006, Validity of accelerometry for monitoring real-world arm activity in patients with subacute stroke: evidence from the extremity constraint-induced therapy evaluation trial, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 87, 1340, 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.06.006
Lang, 2007, Upper extremity use in people with hemiparesis in the first few weeks after stroke, J Neurol Phys Ther, 31, 56, 10.1097/NPT.0b013e31806748bd
Seitz, 2011, Spontaneous arm movement activity assessed by accelerometry is a marker for early recovery after stroke, J Neurol, 258, 457
Page, 2002, Modified constraint-induced therapy in chronic stroke, Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 81, 870, 10.1097/00002060-200211000-00013
Reiterer, 2008, Actigraphy—a useful tool for motor activity monitoring in stroke patients, Eur Neurol, 60, 285, 10.1159/000157882
Rand, 2012, Disparity between functional recovery and daily use of the upper and lower extremities during subacute stroke rehabilitation, Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 26, 76, 10.1177/1545968311408918
Keil, 1999, Relation of accelerometer and EMG recordings for the measurement of upper extremity movement, J Psychophysiol, 13, 77, 10.1027//0269-8803.13.2.77
de Niet, 2007, The stroke upper-limb activity monitor: its sensitivity to measure hemiplegic upper-limb activity during daily life, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 88, 1121, 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.005
van der Pas, 2011, Assessment of arm activity using triaxial accelerometry in patients with a stroke, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 92, 1437, 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.02.021
Duncan, 2000, Defining post-stroke recovery: implications for design and interpretation of drug trials, Neuropharmacology, 39, 835, 10.1016/S0028-3908(00)00003-4
Jorgensen, 1995, Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 76, 406, 10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80568-0
Hendricks, 2002, Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 83, 1629, 10.1053/apmr.2002.35473
Shelton, 2001, Effect of lesion location on upper limb motor recovery after stroke, Stroke, 32, 107, 10.1161/01.STR.32.1.107
Patel, 2000, The relation between impairments and functional outcomes poststroke, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 81, 1357, 10.1053/apmr.2000.9397
Jorgensen, 1995, Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 76, 399, 10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80567-2
Olsen, 1990, Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation, Stroke, 21, 247, 10.1161/01.STR.21.2.247
Teasell, 2008
Dromerick, 2009, Very early constraint-induced movement during stroke rehabilitation (vectors): a single-center RCT, Neurology, 73, 195, 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ab2b27
Shepherd, 2001, Exercise and training to optimize functional motor performance in stroke: driving neural reorganization?, Neural Plast, 8, 121, 10.1155/NP.2001.121
Dobkin, 2005, Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke, N Engl J Med, 352, 1677, 10.1056/NEJMcp043511
DeJong, 2005, Opening the black box of post-stroke rehabilitation: stroke rehabilitation patients, processes, and outcomes, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 86, S1, 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.09.003
Collin, 1990, Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 53, 576, 10.1136/jnnp.53.7.576
Mathiowetz, 1985, Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 66, 69
Mathiowetz, 1984, Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations, J Hand Surg Am, 9, 222, 10.1016/S0363-5023(84)80146-X
Fugl-Meyer, 1975, The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance, Scand J Rehabil Med, 7, 13, 10.2340/1650197771331
Veerbeek, 2011, Is accurate prediction of gait in nonambulatory stroke patients possible within 72 hours poststroke? The EPOS study, Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 25, 268, 10.1177/1545968310384271
Jaeschke, 1989, Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference, Control Clin Trials, 10, 407, 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6
Thrane, 2011, Arm use in patients with subacute stroke monitored by accelerometry: association with motor impairment and influence on self-dependence, J Rehabil Med, 43, 299, 10.2340/16501977-0676