Assessment of the Relationship between Neighborhood Characteristics and Dental Caries Severity among Low‐Income African‐Americans: A Multilevel Approach

Journal of Public Health Dentistry - Tập 66 Số 1 - Trang 30-36 - 2006
Marisol Téllez1, Woosung Sohn, Brian A. Burt, Amid I. Ismaïl
1Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences, and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, 1101 N. University, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

Tóm tắt

AbstractObjectives: To assess the relationship between neighborhood effects and the severity of dental caries among low‐income African‐Americans. Methods: A multistage probability sample of African‐American families living in the poorest 39 census tracts in Detroit was drawn. During 2002–03, cross‐sectional data of a cohort that includes 1021 caregivers were collected in the first of three waves of interviews and examinations. Multilevel analyses focused on 27 neighborhood clusters and involved a combination of individual (Level‐1) and neighborhood (Level‐2) data including census and geocoded (address matching to census geographic areas) information. Results: There is significant variation in the severity of caries between low‐income neighborhood clusters. Caries severity decreases with a higher number of churches, while it increases with a higher number of grocery stores in the clusters after accounting for individual characteristics. Only 14% of the inter‐individual variability in caries was explained by classical individual risk factors for this condition. Conclusion: Neighborhoods contribute something unique to caregivers' oral health, beyond socioeconomic position and individual risk factors. Multilevel interventions are necessary to reduce disparities among African‐Americans and churches may offer a promising venue from which to conduct them.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/1467-9566.00275

Link BG, 1995, Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease, J Health and Soc Behav, 230

10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114637

10.2337/diacare.25.11.1976

Diez‐Roux AV, 2001, Area characteristics and individual‐level socioeconomic position indicators in three population‐based epiemiologic studies, Aerratum appears in AEP., 30, 395

10.1093/aje/155.6.507

10.1093/aje/kwf207

10.2105/AJPH.91.9.1487

10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00266-0

Merrino J, 2003, Neighborhood effects influencing reproductive health of Chilean women, Revista Medica Chilena., 131, 987

10.1034/j.1600-0722.2001.00022.x

Kawachi I, 2000, Social Epidemiology

Marmot MG, 1999, Social Determinants of Health

10.1093/aje/kwf170

10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20936.x

Taylor RJ, 2004, Religion in the Lives of African Americans

10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21031.x

10.1159/000077769

10.2307/4593265

Census Data 2000. US Census Bureau. Available at:http://www.census.gov/. AccessedApril 4 2004.

10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009191

SAS, 2004, SAS Syste‐n 9.1 for Windows

10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00320-2

SUDAAN, 2004, SUDAAN 9 for windows

Raghunathan TE, 2001, Sequential Regression Imputation for Survey Data, Survey Methodology., 27, 85

10.4135/9781849209366

Hox J., 1995, Applied Multilevel Analysis

10.1006/pmed.1996.0057

10.1093/aje/kwf171

10.2105/AJPH.94.6.1030

Troutt DD., 1993, The thin red line: how the poor still pay more

10.1079/PHN2001142

Rothman KJ, 1998, Modern Epidemiology