Assessment of dynamic site response of the peat deposits at an industrial site (Turkey) and comparison with some seismic design codes
Tóm tắt
Peat is an organic soil type with properties of high compressibility and high water content. Peat deposits are often unsuitable for supporting structures of any kind due to their susceptibility to cause a number of geo-engineering problems, such as settlement, slope instability and soil amplification. There are peatlands in Turkey, although these are not so extensive as in other countries, such as Canada, where peatlands are very common. One of the peat deposits in Turkey is located close to the city of Kayseri (Central Anatolia), and industrial structures have been built on these deposits. This paper focuses on one part of a comprehensive research project conducted by the authors on various geo-engineering aspects of the peat deposits in this industrial site, with the main aims to investigate and assess some of the dynamic properties of the peat deposits in this area, to determine and assess their seismic site response and to compare them with the design spectra recommended in the current seismic codes of Turkey and Europe. In the study shear wave velocities of the peat deposits were determined with seismic measurements, and some dynamic properties of the peat were obtained from the resonant column and torsional shear tests. Then site response analyses were carried out and the results were compared with the design spectra recommended for loose-soft soils by the Turkish Seismic Design Codes and European Construction Design Codes. The comparisons suggest that the response spectra of the investigated peat deposits are greater than those recommended in the Turkish Seismic Codes and that at periods of > 0.3–0.5 s the peat will cause an increase in amplification. Although the response spectra of the peat tested show a better agreement with those recommended in the European codes, they show differences at periods of > 1 s.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ajlouni MA (2000) Geotechnical properties of peat and related engineering problems. PhD Thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Arulnathan R, Boulanger RW, Seed MI (2001) Site response of organic soils. In: Proc Fourth Int Conf on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Dynamics. San Diego, CA. Paper No. 1.07
ASTM (2000) Annual book of ASTM standards—soil and rock, building stones: section 4, construction, V. 04.08. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
ASTM (2010) Standard guide for using the direct current resistivity method for subsurface investigation, D6431-99. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
Aydan Ö, Kumsar H, Ulusay R (2002) How to infer the possible mechanism and characteristics of earthquakes from the striations and ground surface traces of existing faults. J Jpn Soc Civil Eng 19(2):199–208
Başokur AT, Ulusay R, Dikmen Ü, Akça T, Gündoğdu Y (2014) Determination of water content using multiple geophysics data groups and its geotechnical applications. Final Report for Project No. 118605500. Scientific Research Coordination Unit of Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey (in Turkish)
Bisch P, Carvalho E, Degee H, Fajfar P, Fardis M, Franchin P, Kreslin M, Pecker A, Pinto P, Plumier A, Somja H, Tsionis G (2011) Worked examples presented at the Workshop “EC 8: Seismic Design of Buildings”. Lisbon, 10–11 Feb, 2011
Boulanger RW, Arulnathan R, Harder LF, Torres RA, Driller M (1998) Dynamic properties of Sherman Island peat. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 124(1):12–20
Boylan N, Long M (2007) Characterization of peat using full flow penetrometers. In: Chan DH, Law KT (eds) Soft soil engineering. Taylor and Francis Group, London, pp 403-414
Darendeli MB (2001) Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves. PhD thesis. University of Texas at Austin, Austin
Demirok Y (1982) Preliminary evaluation of the peat deposit in Kayseri-Ambarkoy and its vicinity. Report No. 7214. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Ankara (in Turkish)
Doğan A, Bulut İ, Karaçam A (2008) Active faults of Kayseri Province and earthquake assessments. Report of the General Directorate of Iller Bank. General Directorate of Iller Bank, Ankara, Turkey
Duraisamy Y, Bujang BK, Aziz AA (2007) Engineering propertis and compressibility behavior of tropical peat soils. Am J Appl Sci 4(10):768–763
Emre Ö, Duman TY, Özalp S, Elmacı H, Olgun S, Şaroğlu F (2013) Active fault map of Turkey with a scale of 1.250.000 and explanations. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Special Publication Series No. 30, Ankara
Ergin K, Güçlü Ü, Uz Z (1962) Earthquake catalogue of Turkey and its surroundings (M.S.11 1964). Publication no. 28 of the Earth Physics Institute, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul (in Turkish)
Fox PJ, Edil TB, Lan LT (1992) Ca/Cc concept applied to compression of peat, journal of geotechnical engineering. ASCE 118(8):1256–1263
GDDA (General Directorate of Disaster Affairs of Turkey) (2007) Laws and regulations for the construction of buildings in hazardous areas. Publication of the General Directorate of Disaster Affairs of Turkey. GDDA, Ankara (in Turkish)
Güner Y, Emre Ö, Baş H (1984) Geology and geomorphology of Erciyes Volcanoe. Report of General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Ankara (in Turkish)
Han B, Zdravkovic L, Kontoe S, Taborda DMG (2017) Numerical investigation of multi-directional site response based on KiK-net downhole array monitoring data. Comput Geotech 89:55–70
Hashash YMA, Musgrove MI, Harmon JA, Groholski DR, Phillips CA, Park D (2015) “DEEPSOIL 6.0, User Manual”.http://deepsoil.cee.illinois.edu/Files/DEEPSOIL_User_Manual_v6.pdf
Huang Y, Xiong M, Zhou H (2015) Ground seismic response analysis based on the probability density evolution method. Eng Geol 198:30–39
Huat BBK (2004) Organic and peat soils engineering. University Putra Malaysia Press, Selengor Darul Ehson, Malaysia
Idriss I, Sun J (1992) User’s Manual for SHAKE 91. Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, University of California, Davis
Japan Road Association (2002) Specifications for highway bridges part V: seismic design. Maruzen, Tokyo
Jarrett PM (1983) Summary of testing of peats and organic soils. In: Jarrett PM (ed) Testing of peats and organic soils. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp 233–237
Kishida T, Boulanger RW, Abrahamson NA, Wehling TM, Driller MW (2009a) Regression models for dynamic properties of highly organic soils. J Geotech Geoenviron 135(4):533–543
Kishida T, Boulanger RW, Abrahamson NA, Driller MW, Wehling TM (2009b) Site effects for the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta. Earthquake Spectra 25(2):301–322
Kivinen E (1980) Proposal for a general classification of virgin peat. In: Grubich DM, Farnham RS, Itkonen B (eds) Proc 6th Int Peat Congress. International Peat Society, Duluth, p 47
Koçyiğit A, Beyhan A (1998) A new intracontinental transcurrent structure: the central Anatolian fault zone, Turkey. Tectonophysics 284:317–336
KOERI (2015) Boğaziçi University Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute Earthquake Catalogue. http://www.koeri.boun.edu.tr/sismo/2/deprem-verileri/deprem-katalogu/. Accessed 15 December 2015
Kottke A, Rathje EM (2009) Technical Manual for STRATA. PEER Report 2008/10. College of Engineering, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, University of California, Berkeley
Kramer SL (1996a) Dynamic response of peats. Final research. report. WA-RD 412.1, Washington State Transportation Center, University of Washington, Seattle
Kramer SL (1996b) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Kramer SL (2000) Dynamic response of mercer slough peat. J Geotech Geoenviron 126(6):504–510
Ladd CC, Foote R (1974) A new design procedure for stability of soft clays. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 100(GT7):763–786
Moreno CA, Rodriguez EE (2004) Dynamic behaviour of Bogota’s subsoil peat and it’s effect in seismic wave propagation. In: Proc 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, BC, Canada, August 1–6 2004
Munro R (2004) Dealing with bearing capacity problems on low volume roads constructed on peat. EU Project, Roadex II Northern Periphery Manual, Scotland
Nikolaou S, Gilsanz R, Iliadelis D, Pehlivan M, Mahvashmohammedi A, Saadat S, Moretti M, Sextos A, Tsopelas P (2015) Learning from structural success rather than failure, Structure Magazine, pp 25–31
Pallara O (2015) Resonant column and torsional shear test on specimens of soil. Report no. 25273/57/a. Diplab Geomechanic Laboratory, Turin Politechnic University, Italy
Pınar N, Lahn E (1952) Earthquake catalogue for Turkey with explanations. Publication of the Ministry of Public Works of Turkish Republic. Department of Structure and Development no. 6(36), Ankara (in Turkish)
Raya JK, Jarret PM (1995) Geoguide 6: site investigation for organic soils and peats. JKR Document 20709-0341-95. Institute Kerja Raya, Malaysia
Şaroğlu F, Emre Ö, Boray A (1987) Active fault map of Turkey. Report of the General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Ankara (in Turkish)
Satyam ND, Towhata I (2014) Site-specific ground response analysis and liquefaction assessment of Vijayawada city (India). Nat Hazards 81:705–724
Scheer PK (1992) Implementation of resonant column/torsional shear testing apparatus. MSc Thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh
Seed HB, Idriss IM (1970) Analyses of ground motions at Union Bay, Seattle, during earthquakes and distant nuclear blasts. Bull Seismol Soc Am 60(1):125–136
Sert S, Önalp A (2007) Settlements of rigid platform on peat and remediation. In: Proc Nat Symp on Soil-structure Interaction in Theory and Practice, Istanbul, pp 181–185 (in Turkish)
Soysal H, Sipahioğlu S, Kolçak D, Altınok Y (1981) Catalogue of historical earthquakes of Turkey and its surroundings. Faculty of Earth Sciences, Deparment of Geophysical Engineering, Istanbul University, Istanbul (in Turkish)
Stokoe KH II, Wright GW, James AB, Jose MR (1994) Characterization of geotechnical sites by SASW method, in geophysical characterization of sites. In: Woods RD (ed) ISSMFE technical committee no. 10. Oxford Publishers, New Delhi
The Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) (2015) Ground motion database. http://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/
Tsai NC (1969) Influence of local geology on earthquake ground motion. PhD thesis. Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
TUSIAD (2009) Assessment of energy strategy of Turkey at the beginning of new century: fossil fuel reserves of Turkey, production, and facilities to improve them. http://www.tusiad.org/turkish/rapor/enerji/html/sec6.html. Accessed 19 Feb 2009 (in Turkish)
Ulusay R, Tuncay E, Sönmez H, Gökçeoğlu C (2004) An attenuation relationship based on Turkish strong motion data and iso-acceleration map of Turkey. Eng Geol 74:265–291
Ulusay R, Tuncay E, Hasançebi N (2010) Geo-engineering properties and settlement of peaty soils at an industrial site (Turkey). Bull Eng Geol Environ 69:397–410
Von Post L, Granlund E (1926) Peat resources in southern Sweden. I. Yearbook 19.2 Series C, No. 335. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, Stockholm
Vucetic M, Dobry R (1991) Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. J Geotech Eng ASCE 117(1):89–107
Wehling TM, Boulanger RW, Arulnathan R, Harder LF Jr, Driller MW (2003) Nonlinear dynamic properties of a fibrous organic soil. J Geotech Geoenviron 129(10):929–939
Wüst RAJ, Bustin RM, Lavkulich LM (2003) New classification systems for tropical organic-rich deposits based on studies of the Tasek Bera Basin, Malaysia. Catena 53:133–163
Yang J, Sato T (2000) Interpretation of seismic vertical amplification observed at an array site. J Seismol Soc Am 90(2):275–285
Yang J, Yan XR (2009) Site response to multi-directional earthquake loading: a practical procedure. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29:710–721