Assessing the relevance of stakeholder analysis for national ecological network governance: The case of the Green Network in Estonia

Journal for Nature Conservation - Tập 21 - Trang 206-213 - 2013
Monika Suškevičs1, Kadri Tillemann2, Mart Külvik1
1Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 1, 51014, Tartu, Estonia
2Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia

Tài liệu tham khảo

Appelstrand, 2002, Participation and societal values: The challenge for lawmakers and policy practitioners, Forest Policy and Economics, 4, 281, 10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00070-9 Bennett, 2004 Bennett, G., & Mulongoy, K.-J. (Eds.) (2006). Review of experience with ecological networks, corridors and buffer zones (103 pp.). Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. CBD Technical Series No. 23. Billgren, 2008, Approaching reality: Comparing stakeholder analysis and cultural theory in the context of natural resource management, Land Use Policy, 25, 550, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.11.004 Boitani, 2007, Ecological networks as conceptual frameworks or operational tools in conservation, Conservation Biology, 21, 1414, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00828.x Bryson, 2004, What to do when stakeholders matter? Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques, Public Management Review, 6, 21, 10.1080/14719030410001675722 Buanes, 2004, In whose interest? An exploratory analysis of stakeholders in Norwegian coastal zone planning, Ocean & Coastal Management, 47, 207, 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2004.04.006 Estonian Ministry of Environment, 2001 Estonian Ministry of Environment (2010). Keskkonnainfo kättesaadavuse ja keskkonnaasjade otsustamises üldsuse osalemise ning neis asjus kohtu poole pöördumise konventsiooni rakendamise aruanne (29 pp.). Aarhus Convention Implementation Report [in Estonian]. European Commission, 2011, Our life insurance, our natural capital: An EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 Evans, 2009, Understanding divergent perspectives in marine governance in Kenya, Marine Policy, 33, 784, 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.02.013 Freeman, 2010 Graneheim, 2004, Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness, Nurse Education Today, 24, 105, 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001 Grimble, 1998 Grimble, 1997, Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: A review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities, Agricultural Systems, 55, 173, 10.1016/S0308-521X(97)00006-1 Heidrich, 2009, Stakeholder analysis for industrial waste management systems, Waste Management, 29, 965, 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.04.013 Jones-Walters, 2011, Biodiversity and stakeholder participation, Journal for Nature Conservation, 19, 327, 10.1016/j.jnc.2011.09.001 Jongman, 2006, Ecological networks, from concept to implementation, 57 Jongman, 2004, European ecological networks and greenways, Landscape and Urban Planning, 68, 305, 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00163-4 Kivimaa, 2009, The Green Network plan in Estonia: Implementation lessons learned at county and local levels, 113 Maguire, 2012, The role of stakeholders in the marine planning process – Stakeholder analysis within the Solent, United Kingdom, Marine Policy, 36, 246, 10.1016/j.marpol.2011.05.012 Mikalsen, 2001, From user-groups to stakeholders? The public interest in fisheries management, Marine Policy, 25, 281, 10.1016/S0308-597X(01)00015-X Miles, 1994 Mushove, 2005, Heads or tails? Stakeholder analysis as a tool for conservation area management, Global Environmental Change, 15, 184, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.008 Opdam, 2006, Ecological networks: A spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes, Landscape and Urban Planning, 75, 322, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.015 Pomeroy, 2008, The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process, Marine Policy, 32, 816, 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.017 Ramirez, 1999, Stakeholder analysis and conflict management, 101 Ramirez, 2005, Facilitation of collaborative management: Reflections from practice, Systemic Practice and Action Research, 18, 5, 10.1007/s11213-005-2456-6 Rastogi, 2010, Assessing the utility of stakeholder analysis to protected areas management: The case of Corbett National Park, India, Biological Conservation, 143, 2956, 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.039 Reed, 2009, Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management, Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1933, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001 Rockloff, 2004, Participatory tools for coastal zone management: Use of stakeholder analysis and social mapping in Australia, Journal of Coastal Conservation, 10, 81, 10.1652/1400-0350(2004)010[0081:PTFCZM]2.0.CO;2 Rowley, 2011, e-Government stakeholders – Who are they and what do they want?, International Journal of Information Management, 31, 53, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.05.005 Salam Md., 2006, Evaluating capacity development for participatory forest management in Bangladesh's Sal forests based on “4Rs” stakeholder analysis, Forest Policy and Economics, 8, 785, 10.1016/j.forpol.2004.12.004 Sepp, 2002 2002, 183 Sepp, 2009, Estonia: The Green Network, 27 Sovacool, 2010, A critical stakeholder analysis of the Trans-ASEAN Gas Pipeline (TAGP) network, Land Use Policy, 27, 788, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.10.012 Suškevičs, M. (2008). Kaasamise korraldus maakonna tasandi rohevõrgustiku planeerimisel[[nl]]The Design of Participatory Processes within the Planning of Estonian Green Network at Regional Scale (119 pp.). Master thesis. Estonian University of Life Sciences [in Estonian].