Assessing the quality and trustworthiness of citizen science data

Concurrency Computation Practice and Experience - Tập 25 Số 4 - Trang 454-466 - 2013
Jane Hunter1, Abdulmonem Alabri1, Catharine van Ingen2
1The University of Queensland, Brisbane Qld 4072, Australia#TAB#
2Microsoft Research San Francisco CA USA

Tóm tắt

SUMMARYThe Internet, Web 2.0 and Social Networking technologies are enabling citizens to actively participate in ‘citizen science’ projects by contributing data to scientific programmes via the Web. However, the limited training, knowledge and expertise of contributors can lead to poor quality, misleading or even malicious data being submitted. Subsequently, the scientific community often perceive citizen science data as not worthy of being used in serious scientific research—which in turn, leads to poor retention rates for volunteers. In this paper, we describe a technological framework that combines data quality improvements and trust metrics to enhance the reliability of citizen science data. We describe how online social trust models can provide a simple and effective mechanism for measuring the trustworthiness of community‐generated data. We also describe filtering services that remove unreliable or untrusted data and enable scientists to confidently reuse citizen science data. The resulting software services are evaluated in the context of the CoralWatch project—a citizen science project that uses volunteers to collect comprehensive data on coral reef health. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x

10.5751/ES-02197-120211

M. E. S. S. A. G. E, 2010, Project Overview

10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00373-7

PaulosE.Designing for doubt citizen science and the challenge of change.Proceedings of the Engaging Data: First International Forum on the Application and Management of Personal Electronic Information MIT 2009.

10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017

10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[1425:TROCSA]2.0.CO;2

10.1007/s10530-007-9114-0

10.1145/1594173.1594174

Massa P, 2008, Trustlet, open research on trust metrics, Scientific International Journal for Parallel and Distributed Computing, 9, 341

Advogato.org, 2010, Advogato's Trust Metric

Reid C, 2009, Coral Reefs and Climate Change: The Guide for Education and Awareness

CoralWatch.Coral Health Chart.http://www.coralwatch.org/web/guest/coral‐health‐chart[Accessed on 26 August 2012].

10.1145/240455.240479

Huang K‐T, 1999, Quality Information and Knowledge

10.4018/jdm.2004010104

10.1145/505248.506010

The BioGeoMancer Project. Available at:http://biogeomancer.sourceforge.net/ 2010.

ReefCheck Australia.http://www.reefcheckaustralia.org/[Accessed on 28 August 2012].

NOAA Satellite and Information Service Coral Reef Watch. “Calculating thermal stress and predicting coral bleaching: a lesson in NOAA coral reef watch methodology”. Available at:http://coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/satellite/education/bilko_lesson.html. [Accessed on 28 August 2012].

AIMS data centre. Available at:http://data.aims.gov.au/metadataviewer/faces/search.xhtml[Accessed on 28 August 2012].

10.1007/s10462-004-0041-5

PostGIS, 2010, What is PostGIS?

Grzonkowski S, 2007, D‐FOAF: Role‐based Access Control Standard

RezelR LiangS.SWE‐FE: extending folksonomies to the sensor Web.Proceedings of the International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems (CTS 2010) Chicago USA 2010.