Assessing the practical implementation of the EU’s values in EU–China dialogues

Asia Europe Journal - Tập 19 - Trang 227-244 - 2021
Max Roger Taylor1
1Department of Politics, Languages & International Studies, University of Bath, Bath, UK

Tóm tắt

Literature debating the role of the EU’s values in its external relations has neglected to adequately define and empirically explore the practical promotion or mainstreaming of these aspects in diplomatic dialogues with third countries, at the micro-level. Departing from an often abstract focus by scholars on policy outcomes at the macro-level, a concentration on micro-level processes enables an explanation of how value mainstreaming is actually taking place and the elements informing this. It encompasses the role of individual EU officials, the mechanisms guiding their activities, and the impact of interlocutors from third countries. Addressing this gap, this paper defines EU value mainstreaming and conducts a discourse analysis of a comprehensive sample of interviews with EU officials operationalising EU–China dialogues, arguably the hardest test case. It is found that value mainstreaming is rarely taking place in practice due to a nuanced combination of factors. These include EU officials’ perceived lack of responsibility for undertaking such activities, anticipated obstruction by Chinese interlocutors, and counterproductive mainstreaming approaches.

Tài liệu tham khảo

AFET (2015) Report on EU–China relations. European Parliament Committee on Foreign Affairs (AFET). (2015/2003(INI)), Brussels Aggestam L (2008) Introduction: ethical power Europe. Int Aff 84:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00685.x Bull H (1982) Civilian power Europe: a contradiction in terms? J Common Market Stud 21:149–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1982.tb00866.x Casarini N (2006) The evolution of the EU–China relationship: from constructive engagement to strategic partnership. European Union Institute for Security Studies, Occasional Paper 64. http://ftp.infoeuropa.eurocid.pt/database/000037001-000038000/000037834.pdf. Accessed 15 November 2019 COE (2018) What is gender mainstreaming? Council of Europe. https://www.coe.int/en/web/genderequality/what-is-gender-mainstreaming. Accessed 14 November 2019 Damro C (2012) Market power Europe. J Eur Public Policy 19:682–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.646779 De Waal MD (2006) Evaluating gender mainstreaming in development projects. Dev Pract 16:209–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520600562454 Diez T (2013) Normative power as hegemony. Cooperation and Conflict 48:194–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836713485387 Duchêne F (1973) The European Community and the uncertainties of interdependence. In: Kohnstamm LJ (ed) A nation writ large. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester, pp 1–21 EEAS (2017) EU–China dialogue architecture. European External Action Service. https://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/china_en/18538/EU–China%20Dialogue%20Architecture. Accessed 11 May 2018 EU (2010) Consolidated treaties, Charter of Fundamental Rights. https://europa.eu/european-union/sites/europaeu/files/eu_citizenship/consolidated-treaties_en.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2019 EU (2016a) Shared vision, common action: a stronger Europe. A global strategy for the European Union’s foreign and security policy. https://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf. Accessed 15 November 2019 EU (2016b) Elements for a new strategy on China. JOIN(2016) 30 final. Brussels. 22 June EU (2017) Belt and road forum—EU common messages. https://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/china_fi/26051/Belt%20and%20Road%20Forum%2D%2DEU%20common%20messagesb. Accessed 12 November 2019 EU (2019a) Gender mainstreaming. https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sectors/human-rights-and-democratic-governance/gender-equality/gender-mainstreaming_en. Accessed 11 November 2019 EU (2019b) EU–China relations factsheet. https://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/china/34728/EU–China-relations-factsheet_en. Accessed 11 November 2019 EU (2019c) EU–China—a strategic outlook. JOIN(2019) 5 final. Brussels. 12 March EU Council (2010) Council decision of 26 July 2010 establishing the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service. https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/eeas_decision_en.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2018 EU Council (2012) Strategic framework and action plan for human rights and democracy. 11855/12. Luxembourg. 25 June EU Council (2017) EU annual report on human rights and democracy in the world in 2016. https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/annual_report_on_human_rights_and_democracy_in_the_world_2016_0.pdf. Accessed 1 February 2018. Farnell J, Crookes PI (2016) Politics of EU–China economic relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London Fox, J., Godement, F. (2009) A power audit of EU–China relations. European Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.ecfr.eu/page/-/ECFR12_-_A_POWER_AUDIT_OF_EU–CHINA_RELATIONS.pdf. Accessed 26 August 2018 Geeraerts G (2019) The EU–China partnership: balancing between divergence and convergence. Asia Europe Journal 17:281–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-019-00554-2 Guo S (2013) Chinese politics and government: power, ideology and organisation. Routledge, New York Kinzelbach K (2015) The EU's human rights dialogue with China: quiet diplomacy and its limits. Routledge, New York Maher R (2016) The elusive EU–China strategic partnership. Int Aff 92:959–976. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12659 Manners I (2002) Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms? J Common Market Stud 40:235–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00353 Manners I (2008) The normative ethics of the European Union. Int Aff 84:45–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00688.x Mattlin M (2012) Dead on arrival: normative EU policy towards China’. Asia Europe Journal 10:181–198 https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10308-012-0321-7.pdf Men J (2011) Between human rights and sovereignty—an examination of EU–China political relations. Eur Law J 17:534–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00564.x Michalski A, Nilsson N (2018) Resistant to change? The EU as a normative power and its troubled relations with Russia and China. Foreign Policy Anal 15:432–449. https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/ory008 Milliken J (1999) The study of discourse in international relations: a critique of research and methods. Eur J Int Relat 5: 225-254. 10.1177/1354066199005002003 Moser C, Moser A (2005) Gender mainstreaming since Beijing: a review of success and limitations in international institutions. Gend Dev 13:11–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552070512331332283 Raube K, Burnay M (2018) Coherence, strategy and legitimacy–variations of a theme in the case of EU–China relations. Glob Affairs 4:291–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2018.1535254 Reuters (2017) Greece blocks EU statement on China human rights at U.N. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-un-rights/greece-blocks-eu-statement-on-china-human-rights-at-u-n-idUSKBN1990FP. Accessed 22 May 2018. Stephens N (2007) Collecting data from elites and ultra elites: telephone and face-to-face interviews with macroeconomists. Qual Res 7:203–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107076020 UN (2019) Gender mainstreaming. United Nations. https://www.unwomen.org/en/how-we-work/un-system-coordination/gender-mainstreaming. Accessed 23 October 2019 Van Eerdewijk A, Davids T (2014) Escaping the mythical beast: gender mainstreaming reconceptualised. J Int Dev 26:303–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.2947 Verloo MMT (2001) Another velvet revolution? Gender mainstreaming and the politics of implementation. IWM Working Paper No.5. https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/129386/129386.pdf. Accessed 23 October 2019 Zhao J (2015) China and the uneasy case for universal human rights. Hum Rights Q 37(1):29–52