Assessing the potential of bioeconomy in Slovakia based on public perception of renewable materials in contrast to non-renewable materials

Ambio - Tập 49 - Trang 1912-1924 - 2020
Lenka Navrátilová1, Jozef Výbošťok1, Zuzana Dobšinská1, Jaroslav Šálka1, Magdaléna Pichlerová2, Viliam Pichler3
1Department of Forest Economics and Management, Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia
2Department of Planning and Landscape Design, Faculty of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia
3Department of Natural Environment, Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia

Tóm tắt

There is a need for societal transformation towards bioeconomy, which promotes the replacement of non-renewable natural resources with renewable ones. Slovakia has considerable potential for bioeconomy development, yet this potential remains untapped. This article evaluates the public perception regarding the individual properties of renewable and non-renewable materials and their relation to the potential for bioeconomy development in Slovakia. It is found that Slovak consumers prefer natural renewable materials, regardless of other influencing factors, and realise the need for transformation towards a more sustainable economy.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Biookonomierat. 2015. Bioeconomy Policy (Part II) Synopsis of National Strategies around the World. Berlin Birch, K., L. Levidow, and T. Papaioannou. 2012. Self-fulfilling prophecies of the European knowledge-based bio-economy: The discursive shaping of institutional and policy frameworks in the bio-pharmaceuticals sector. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 5: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-. Bracco, S., Ö. Calicioglu, A. Flammini, M.G. San Juan, and A. Bogdanski. 2019. Analysis of standards, certifications and labels for bio-based products in the context of sustainable bioeconomy. International Journal of Standardization Research (IJSR) 17: 1–22. Caricati, L. 2007. The relationship between social dominance orientation and gender: The mediating role of social values. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 57: 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9231-3. Chen, T.B., and L.T. Chai. 2010. Attitude towards the environment and green products: Consumers’ perspective. Management science and engineering 4: 27–39. Curran, M. A. 2010. Biobased materials. In Kirk‐Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 1–19. New Jersey: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471238961.biobcurr.a01. Dilkes-Hoffman, L.S., S. Pratt, B. Laycock, P. Ashworth, and P.A. Lant. 2019a. Public attitudes towards plastics. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 147: 227–235. Dilkes-Hoffman, L., P. Ashworth, B. Laycock, S. Pratt, and P. Lant. 2019b. Public attitudes towards bioplastics—Knowledge, perception and end-of-life management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 151: 104479. Donia, E., A.M. Mineo, and F. Sgroi. 2018. A methodological approach for assessing businness investments in renewable resources from a circular economy perspective. Land Use Policy 76: 823–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.017. Dwivedi, P., and J.R.R. Alavalapati. 2009. Stakeholders’ perceptions on forest biomass-based bioenergy development in the southern US. Energy Policy 37: 1999–2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.004. Elgaaïed-Gambier, L. 2016. Who buys overpackaged grocery products and why? Understanding consumers’ reactions to overpackaging in the food sector. Journal of Business Ethics 135: 683–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2491-2. European Commission. 2005. New perspectives on the knowledge-based bio-economy—conference report. Brussels. Retrieved 8 November, 2019, from https://www.normalesup.org/~adanchin/lectures/kbbe_conferencereport.pdf. European Commision. 2012. Innovating for sustainable growth. A bioeconomy for Europe. Retrieved 8 October, 2019, from https://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/pdf/officialstrategy_en.pdf. European Commission. 2018. A sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. Updated Bioeconomy Strategy. Retrieved 10 October, 2019, from https://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/pdf/ec_bioeconomy_strategy_2018.pdf. Eurostat. 2016. Urban Europe: Statistics on cities, towns and suburbs. Retrieved 25 September, 2019, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Urban_Europe_%E2%80%94_statistics_on_cities,_towns_and_suburbs. Eurostat. 2019a. Share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption. Retrieved 19 August, 2019, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php?title=File:Share_of_renewable_energy_in_gross_final_energy_consumption,_by_sector,_EU-28,_2000-2016_(%25).png. Eurostat. 2019b. Europe 2020 indicators—Climate change and energy: General overview. Retrieved 21 August, 2019, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php?title=Europe_2020_indicators__climate_change_and_energy#General_overview. Eurostat. 2019c. Material flow accounts. Retrieved 22 September, 2019, from https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=env_ac_mfa&lang=en. Haldar, S. 2019. Green entrepreneurship in the renewable energy sector—A case study of Gujarat. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management 10: 234–250. Hausknost, D., E. Schriefl, C. Lauk, and G. Kalt. 2017. A transition to which bioeconomy? An exploration of diverging techno-political choices. Sustainability 9: 669. Hurmekoski, E., M. Lovrić, N. Lovrić, L. Hetemäki, and G. Winkel. 2019. Frontiers of the forest-based bioeconomy—A European Delphi study. Forest Policy and Economics 102: 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.03.008. Imbert, E., L. Ladu, A. Tani, and P. Morone. 2019. The transition towards a bio-based economy: A comparative study based on social network analysis. Journal of Environmental Management 230: 255–265. Jonsson, O., S. Lindberg, A. Roos, M. Hugosson, and M. Lindström. 2008. Consumer perceptions and preferences on solid wood, wood-based panels, and composites: A repertory grid study. Wood and Fiber Science 40: 663–678. Kaputa, V. 2006. Environmental attributes of wood products and competitive. Intercathedra 2006: 49–51. Kaputa, V., A.P. Barčić, H. Maťová, and D. Motik. 2018. Consumer preferences for wooden furniture in Croatia and Slovakia. BioResources 13: 6280–6299. Kitek Kuzman, M., D. Motik, K. Bičanić, R. Vlosky, and L. Oblak. 2012. A comparative analysis of consumer attitudes on the use of wood products in Slovenia and Croatia. Drvna industrija: Znanstveni časopis za pitanja drvne tehnologije 63: 71–79. Kleinschmit, D., B. Arts, A. Guirca, I. Mustalahti, A. Sergent, and H. Pülzl. 2017. Environmental concerns in political bioeconomy discourses. Inernational Forestry Review 19: 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554817822407420. Krejcie, R.V., and D.W. Morgan. 1970. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement 30: 607–610. Kurisu, K.H., and A.P. Bortoleto. 2011. Comparison of waste prevention behaviors among three Japanese Megacity REGIONS in the context of local measures and socio-demographics. Waste Management 31: 1441–1449. Laibach, N., J. Börner, and S. Bröring. 2019. Exploring the future of the bioeconomy: An expert-based scoping study examining key enabling technology fields with potential to foster the transition toward a bio-based economy. Technology in Society 58: 101–118. Lewandowski, I., N. Gaudet, J. Lask, J. Maier, B. Tchouga, and R. Vagas-Carpintero. 2018. Bioeconomy: Shaping the Transition to a Sustainable Biobased Economy. Springer: University of Hohenheim. ISBN 978-3-319-68152-8. Litardi, I., G. Fiorani, and D. Alimonti. 2020. The state of the art of green public procurement in Europe: Documental analysis of european practices. Accountability, Ethics and Sustainability of Organizations, 175–192. Cham: Springer. Lynch, D.H.J., P. Klaassen, and J.E.W. Broerse. 2016. Unraveling Dutch citizens’ perceptions on the bio-based economy: The case of bioplastics, bio-jetfuels and small-scale bio refineries. Industrial Crops and Products 106: 130–137. Mac Kinnon, M., J. Brouwer, and S. Samuelsen. 2018. The role of natural gas and its infrastructure in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, improving regional air quality, and renewable resource integration. Progress in Energy and Combust Science 64: 62–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.10.002. Madigele, P.K., G.E. Mogomotsi, and M. Kolobe. 2017. Consumer willingness to pay for plastic bags levy and willingness to accept eco-friendly alternatives in Botswana. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment 15: 255–261. Magnier, L., and J. Schoormans. 2017. How do packaging material, colour and environmental claim influence package, brand and product evaluations? Packaging Technology and Science 30: 735–751. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2318. Magnier, L., and D. Crié. 2015. Communicating packaging eco-friendliness: An exploration of consumers’ perceptions of eco-designed packaging. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management 43: 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-. Magnier, L., and J. Schoormans. 2015. Consumer reactions to sustainable packaging: The interplay of visual appearance, verbal claim and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology 44: 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.005. Miklenčičová, R. 2015. Perception of environmental product labelling by Slovak consumers. Procedia Economics and Finance 34: 644–648. Ministry of the Evironment. 2020. Low-Carbon Development Strategy of the Slovak Republic until 2030 with a View to 2050. Retrieved 14 March, 2020, from https://www.minzp.sk/files/oblasti/politika-zmeny-klimy/low-carbon-development-strategyof-slovak-republic-until-2030-view-2050.pdf. McGlade, C., and P. Ekins. 2015. The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C. Nature 517: 187–203. Mohai, P. 1991. Men, women, and the environment: An examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism. Society and Natural Resources 5: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929209380772. Meeusen, M., Peuckert, J., Quitzow, R. 2015. Open-Bio - D9.1. Acceptance factors for bio-based products and related information systems. LEI-DLO, TU- Berlin. Retrieved 19 March, 2020, from https://www.biobasedeconomy.eu/app/uploads/sites/2/2017/07/Acceptance-factors-for-bio-based-products-and-related-information-systems.pdf. Paluš, H., H. Maťová, and V. Kaputa. 2012. Consumer preferences for joinery products and furniture in Slovakia and Poland. Acta Facultatis Xylologiae 54: 123–132. Philp, J.C., and P. Krishna. 2013. Bio-based production in a Bioeconomy. Asian Biotechnology and Development Review 15: 81–88. Philp, J.C. 2015. Balancing the bioeconomy: supporting biofuels and bio-based materials in public policy. Energy and Environmental Science 11: 3063–3068. Popescu, I. 2014. Industrial biotechnology in the European Union: Identifying the best pathways to boost growth of the bioeconomy. Industrial Biotechnology 10: 376–378. https://doi.org/10.1089/ind.2014.1537. Scarlat, N., J.F. Dallemand, F. Monforti-Ferrario, and V. Nita. 2015. The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: Policies and facts. Environmantal Development 15: 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.03.006. Siegner, M., R. Panwar, and R. Kozak. 2017. Making the bioeconomy more inclusive: The role of community forestry and agro-forestry. Austrian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Rural Studies 26: 229–238. Schmid, O., S. Padel, and L. Levidow. 2012. The bio-economy concept and knowledge base in a public goods and farmer perspective. Bio-Based Applied Economics 1: 47–63. Schwepker, C.H., and T.B. Cornwell. 1991. An examination of ecologically concerned consumers and their intention to purchase ecologically packaged products. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 10: 77–101. Sijtsema, S.J., M.C. Onwezen, M.J. Reinders, H. Dagevos, A. Partanen, and M. Meeusen. 2016. Consumer perception of bio-based products—An exploratory study in 5 European countries. NJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 77: 61–69. Silayoi, P., and M. Speece. 2004. Packaging and purchase decisions: an exploratory study on the impact of involvement level and time pressure. British Food Journal 106: 607–628. Simon, R.M. 2010. Gender differences in knowledge and attitude towards biotechnology. Public Understanding of Science 19: 642–653. Spierling, S., E. Knüpffer, H. Behnsen, M. Mudersbach, H. Krieg, S. Springer, and H.J. Endres. 2018. Bio-based plastics—A review of environmental, social and economic impact assessments. Journal of Cleaner Production 185: 476–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.014. Staffas, L., M. Gustavsson, and K. McCormick. 2013. Strategies and policies for the bioeconomy and bio-based economy: An analysis of official national approaches. Sustainability 5: 2751–2769. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5062751. Stafford, W., W. De Lange, A. Nahman, V. Chunilall, P. Lekha, J. Andrew, B. Johakimu, and D. Trotter. 2020. Forestry biorefineries. Renewable Energy 154: 461–475. Tietenberg, T., Lewis, L. 2015. Environmental & Natural Resource Economics (10th Edition) (Pearson Series in Economics). 606. New York: Pearson Education, Inc. ISBN 0-13-347969-2. UNEP. 2011. Towards a green economy: pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication—A synthesis for policy makers, Environment. 1–34. Retrieved 25 February, 2020, from https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3159605www.unep.o. Winkel, G. 2017. Towards a sustainable European forest-based bioeconomy—Assessment and the way forward. In What Science Can Tell Us 8: 15–18. ISBN 978-952-5980-42-4. Yang, Y., H.S. Solgaard, and W. Haider. 2016. Wind, hydro or mixed renewable energy source: Preference for electricity products when the share of renewable energy increases. Energy Policy 97: 521–531.