Assessing the influence of rapid urban growth and regional policies on biological resources

Landscape and Urban Planning - Tập 93 - Trang 172-183 - 2009
Karen Beardsley1, James H. Thorne1, Nathaniel E. Roth1, Shengyi Gao1, Michael C. McCoy1
1Department of Environmental Science and Policy, One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Arax, 2003 AB 32—California Assembly Bill 32, ch. 488, 2006. Baker, 2004, Alternative futures for the Willamette River Basin, Oregon, Ecol. Appl., 14, 313, 10.1890/02-5011 The California Energy Commission, 2001. Shining PLACE3S: Sacramento and National Examples of Smart Growth. Sacramento, CA. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), § 21000 et seq, 1972. CDBTH California Department of Business Transportation and Housing, 2007. California Regional Blueprint Planning Program. From http://calblueprint.dot.ca.gov/ (retrieved February, 2007). California Department of Finance, 2004. Population projections by race/ethnicity for California and its counties 2000–2050. From http://www.dof.ca.gov/HTML/DEMOGRAP/ReportsPapers/Projections/P1/P1.asp (retrieved February, 2007). California Department of Fish and Game, 2006. California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). From California Department of Fish and Game: http://www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/cnddb/ (retrieved January, 2007). California Employment Development Department (EDD), 2007. EDD home page. From http://www.edd.ca.gov/ (retrieved October, 2006). California Gap Analysis (CA GAP), 1998. CA gap analysis vegetation layer (statewide). From University of California, Santa Barbara: http://www.biogeog.ucsb.edu/projects/gap/gap_data.html (retrieved November, 2007). California Partnership for the San Joaquin Valley, 2007. Seed grants. From http://www.sjvpartnership.org/seed_grant_list.php (retrieved November, 2007). California Resources Agency, 2005. Public, conservation and trust lands. From California Resources Agency, Sacramento, CA: http://www.atlas.ca.gov/download.html (retrieved June, 2007). Carsjens, 2007, A GIS-based support tool for sustainable spatial planning in metropolitan areas, Landsc. Urban Plan., 80, 72, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.06.004 Central Intelligence Agency, 2002. The world factbook: field listing—population growth rate. From https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html (retrieved March, 2007). Chiesura, 2004, The role of urban parks for the sustainable city, Landsc. Urban Plan., 68, 129, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.003 Cogan, 2002, Biodiveristy conflict analysis at multiple spatial scales, 229 Colding, 2007, Ecological land-use complementation for building resilience in urban ecosystems, Landsc. Urban Plan., 81, 46, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.10.016 Congressional Research Service, 2005. California's San Joaquin valley: a region in transition. From http://www.csub.edu/library/gov/San_Joaquin_Valley_CRS_Report.pd (retrieved April, 2007).f Dannenberg, 2003, The impact of community design and land-use choices on public health: a scientific research agenda, Am. J. Public Health, 93, 1500, 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1500 Dietzel, 2006, The effect of disaggregating land use categories in cellular automata during model calibration and forecasting., Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., 30, 78, 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2005.04.001 Downs, 2005, Smart growth: why we discuss it more than we do it, J. Am. Plan. Assoc., 71, 367, 10.1080/01944360508976707 Endangered Species Recovery Program, 1999. Historical lakes of the San Joaquin valley. From ESRP, Fresno, CA: http://esrp.csustan.edu/gis/ (retrieved December, 2007). Endangered Species Recovery Program, 2004. Land use and land cover of the San Joaquin valley. From ESRP, Fresno, CA: http://esrp.csustan.edu/gis/ (retrieved December, 2007). Environmental Systems Research Institute, 2007. ArcEditor—Desktop GIS with advanced geographic data editing and management. From http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/arceditor/index.html (retrieved 15.01.07). Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP), 2004. Important farmland. from California Department of Conservation, Sacramento, CA: http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/fmmp/Pages/Index.aspx (retrieved February, 2007). Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 1996. Q3 Flood data. From FEMA, Washington, D.C. http://www.fema.gov/hazard/map/q3.shtm (retrieved January, 2007). Federal Water Pollution Control Act, § 1251 et seq., 1972. Fulton, W.B., 2008. SB 375 is now law—but what will it do? From http://www.cp-dr.com/node/2140 (retrieved 01.11.08). Fulton, 2005 Gao, S., Johnston, R.A., 2004. California general plan map. From http://www.atlas.ca.gov/download.html (retrieved January, 2007). The Great Valley Center, 2008. San Joaquin Valley Blueprint. From http://www.greatvalley.org/blueprint/ (retrieved November, 2007). Hansen, 2005, Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: patterns, mechanisms, and research needs, Ecol. Appl., 15, 1893, 10.1890/05-5221 Holland, R., 1995. Vernal Pool Complexes (Map). Huber, P.R., 2008. The effects of spatial and temporal scale on conservation planning and ecological networks in the Central Valley, California. Dissertation, University of California, Davis. Information Center for the Environment, 2006. UPlan user manual. From http://ice.ucdavis.edu/doc/uplan/resources (retrieved 31.12.06). Information Center for the Environment, 2008. UPlan—urban growth modeling. From http://ice.ucdavis.edu/doc/uplan (retrieved November, 2008). Johnston, R.A., Lehmer, E., Gao, S., Roth, N., McCoy, M., 2008. UPlan land use allocation model 2.6 user's manual. From http://ice.ucdavis.edu/doc/uplan/resources (retrieved March, 2007). Johnston, 2003, UPlan: a versatile urban growth model for transportation planning, Transp. Res. Rec., 1831, 202, 10.3141/1831-23 Johnston, R. A., McCoy, M. C., Kirn, M., Fell, M. (2004). Streamlining the National Environmental Policy Act Process Through Cooperative Local-State-Federal Transportation and Land Use Planning. J. Trans. Res. Board (No. 1880), 135-143. Langpap, 2008, Predicting the effect of land-use policies on wildlife habitat abundance, Can. J. Agric. Econ., 56, 195, 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2008.00125.x Lebel, 2006, Multi-level scenarios for exploring alternative futures for upper tributary watersheds in mainland Southeast Asia, Mountain Res. Develop., 26, 263, 10.1659/0276-4741(2006)26[263:MSFEAF]2.0.CO;2 Longley, 2002, Geographical information systems: will developments in urban remote sensing and GIS lead to ‘better’ urban geography?, Prog. Hum. Geogr., 26, 231, 10.1191/0309132502ph366pr Luck, 2002, A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: a case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA, Landsc. Ecol., 17, 327, 10.1023/A:1020512723753 Mahiny, 2007, Dynamic spatial modeling of urban groth through cellular automata in a GIS environment, Int. J. Environ. Res., 1, 272 McCreary, 1992, Land-use change and impacts on the San-Francisco estuary—a regional assessment with national policy implications, Coast. Manage., 20, 219, 10.1080/08920759209362176 Meade, R.J., McCoy, M.C., 2006. Identifying high value open space and conservation opportunities in the San Joaquin Valley. The San Joaquin Valley: California's 21st century opportunity (strategic action proposal): Appendix H from http://www.bth.ca.gov/capartnership/pdf/0906landuseagriculturehousingworkgroup.pdf (retrieved July, 2007). Merenlender, 2005, Modeling future development for Sonoma County, California: the consequences of agricultural land protection policies for habitat conservation, J. Conserv. Plan., 1, 64 Nassauer, 2004, Using normative scenarios in landscape ecology, Landsc. Urban Plan., 19, 343 National Environmental Policy Act, § 4321–4370a, 1969. Polk, 2005, Biodiversity conservation implications of landscape change in an urbanizing desert of Southwestern Peru, Urban Ecosyst., 8, 313, 10.1007/s11252-005-4864-x Pyke, 2005, Assessing climate change impacts on vernal pool ecosystems and endemic branchiopods, Ecosystems, 8, 95, 10.1007/s10021-004-0086-y Quigley, 1998, Urban diversity and economic growth, J. Econ. Perspect., 12, 127, 10.1257/jep.12.2.127 Rice, 2003, Managing microevolution: restoration in the face of global change, Front. Ecol. Environ., 1, 469, 10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0469:MMRITF]2.0.CO;2 Rural Migration News, 2006. San Joaquin Valley: new appalachia? Rural Migr. News, 13(1). Santelmann, 2004, Assessing alternative futures for agriculture in Iowa, USA, Landsc. Ecol., 19, 357, 10.1023/B:LAND.0000030459.43445.19 Schumaker, 2004, Projecting wildlife responses to alternative future landscapes in Oregon's Willamette Basin, Ecol. Appl., 14, 381, 10.1890/02-5010 Scott, 1993, GAP analysis—a geographic approach to protection of biological diversity, Wildlife Monogr., 123, 1 Stapley, G., 2009. Growth summit chooses density: 31 people per acre in new subdivisions. Modesto Bee, from http://www.modbee.com/local/story/578493.html SB 375—California Senate Bill 375, ch. 728, 2008a. SB 732—California Senate Bill 732, ch. 729, 2008b. Syphard, 2005, Using a cellular automaton model to forecast the effects of urban growth on habitat pattern in southern California, Ecol. Complex., 2, 185, 10.1016/j.ecocom.2004.11.003 Teale GIS Solutions Group, 1998. Hydrarca. From Teale GIS Solutions Group, Sacramento, California: http://greatplaces.ca.gov/data.html (retrieved January, 2007). Teitz, 2005 The Nature Conservancy, 2001. TNC Portfolio Conservation Areas for California (Map). Theobald, 2000, Incorporating biological information in local land-use decision making: designing a system for conservation planning, Landsc. Ecol., 15, 35, 10.1023/A:1008165311026 Theobald, 2005, Ecological support for rural land-use planning, Ecol. Appl., 15, 1906, 10.1890/03-5331 Thorne, 2006, Modeling potential species richness and urban buildout to identify mitigation sites along a California highway, Transp. Res. D: Transp. Environ., 11, 277, 10.1016/j.trd.2006.05.002 Tyler, 2006, Demography and recruitment limitations of three oak species in California, Q. Rev. Biol., 81, 127, 10.1086/506025 Tzoulas, 2007, Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: a literature review, Landsc. Urban Plan., 81, 167, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001 U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, 2002. Grasslands Ecological Areas (Central Valley Habitat Joint Venture) (Map). U.S. Census Bureau, 2000. Report of the US Census Bureau. Washington, D.C. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2000 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1998. Vernal pool complexes in the greater Central Valley (Map). United Nations Population Fund (UNPF), 2007. State of world population 2007: unleashing the potential of urban growth. From http://www.unfpa.org/swp/ (retrieved February, 2007). United States Geological Survey, 2004a. National hydrography dataset 100k flowlines. From United States Geological Survey, Washington D.C.: http://nhd.usgs.gov/index.html (retrieved January, 2007). United States Geological Survey., 2004b. National hydrography dataset 100k waterbodies. From United States Geological Survey, Washington D.C.: http://nhd.usgs.gov/index.html (retrieved January, 2007). van der Valk, 2002, The Dutch planning experience, Landsc. Urban Plan., 58, 201, 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00221-3 Vendlinski, 2000, California's vernal pools: accomplishments and conservation strategies, Fremontia, 28, 19 Weng, 2007, Spatiotemporal changes of landscape pattern in response to urbanization, Landsc. Urban Plan., 81, 341, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.01.009 Wilhere, 2007, Defining alternative futures and projecting their effects on the spatial distribution of wildlife habitats, Landsc. Urban Plan., 79, 385, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.05.001 Zavaleta, 2007, Regional patterns of recruitment success and failure in two endemic California Oaks, Divers. Distrib., 13, 735, 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00384.x