Assessing the impact of alternative land-use zoning policies on future ecosystem services

Acosta-Jamett, 2003, Metapopulation approach to assess survival of Oncifelis guigna in fragmented forests of central Chile: a theoretical model, J Neotrop Mammal, 10, 217

Aldrich, 1984

Balmford, 2008

Bell, 1974, Markov analysis of land use change — an application of stochastic processes to remotely sensed data, Socio Econ Plan Sci, 8, 311, 10.1016/0038-0121(74)90034-2

Birch, 2010, Cost-effectiveness of dryland forest restoration evaluated by spatial analysis of ecosystem services, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 107, 21925, 10.1073/pnas.1003369107

Bragagnolo C, Geneletti D. Dealing with land use decisions in uncertain contexts. A method to support Strategic Environmental Assessment of spatial plans. J Environ Plann Manage in press.

Bragagnolo, 2012, Cumulative effects in SEA of spatial plans — evidence from Italy and England, Impact Assess Proj Apprais, 30, 100, 10.1080/14615517.2012.677522

Carpenter, 2006, Scenarios for ecosystem services: an overview, Ecol Soc, 11, 10.5751/ES-01610-110129

Clark, 1986

CONAF, 1999

Daily, 2008, Ecosystem services: from theory to implementation, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 105, 9455, 10.1073/pnas.0804960105

DeFries, 2004, Land-use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function, Front Ecol Environ, 2, 249, 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0249:LCBHNA]2.0.CO;2

Dunstone, 2002, Spatial organization, ranging behaviour and habitat use of the kodkod (Oncifelis guigna) in southern Chile, J Zool, 257, 1, 10.1017/S0952836902000602

Eastman, 2009

Eastman, 1995, Raster procedures for multi-criteria/multi-objective decisions, Photogramm Eng Remote Sens, 61, 539

Echeverria, 2006, Rapid deforestation and fragmentation of Chilean Temperate Forests, Biol Conserv, 130, 481, 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.01.017

Fischer, 2010, Reviewing the quality of strategic environmental assessment reports for English spatial plan core strategies, Environ Impact Assess Rev, 30, 62, 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.04.002

Foley, 2005, Global consequences of land use, Science, 309, 570, 10.1126/science.1111772

Geneletti, 2011, Reasons and options for integrating ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment of spatial planning, Int J Biodivers Sci, Ecosyst Serv Manage, 7, 143, 10.1080/21513732.2011.617711

Geneletti, 2012, Environmental assessment of spatial plan policies through land use scenarios. A study in a fast-developing town in rural Mozambique, Environ Impact Assess Rev, 32, 1, 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.01.015

Geneletti, 2007, Spatial decision support for strategic environmental assessment of land use plans. A case study in southern Italy, Environ Impact Assess Rev, 27, 408, 10.1016/j.eiar.2007.02.005

Gobierno de Chile, 2009, Catastro de uso del suelo y vegetación

Gontier, 2010, Comparing GIS-based habitat models for applications in EIA and SEA, Environ Impact Assess Rev, 30, 8, 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.003

Haynes, 2003, An analysis of the timber situation in the United States: 1952 to 2050

Hernandez, 2006, The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods, Ecography, 29, 773, 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2006.04700.x

IPCC (The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2006, IPCC guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

Lara, 2009, Assessment of ecosystem services as an opportunity for the conservation and management of native forests in Chile, Forest Ecol Manage, 258, 415, 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.004

MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), 2005

Metzger, 2006, The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change, Agr Ecosyst Environ, 114, 69, 10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.025

Mideplan (Ministerio de Planificación y Cooperación), 2009

Nelson, 2006, Anthropogenic drivers of ecosystem change: an overview, Ecol Soc, 11, 10.5751/ES-01826-110229

Nelson, 2009, Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales, Front Ecol Environ, 7, 4, 10.1890/080023

Nelson, 2010, Projecting global land-use change and its effect on ecosystem service provision and biodiversity with simple models, PLoS One, 5, e14327, 10.1371/journal.pone.0014327

ODEPA, 2006, Catastro Frutícola IX Región de la Araucanía

Phillips, 2004, A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modelling, 83

Phillips, 2006, Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions, Ecol Model, 190, 231, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026

Polasky, 2011, The impact of land-use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: a case study in the state of Minnesota, Environ Res Econ, 48, 219, 10.1007/s10640-010-9407-0

PRDUyT, 2005

Rodríguez, 2006, Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services, Ecol Soc, 11, 10.5751/ES-01667-110128

Sanderson, 2002, Natural history and landscape-use of Guignas (Oncifelis guigna) on Isla Grande de Chiloé, Chile, J Mammal, 83, 608, 10.1644/1545-1542(2002)083<0608:NHALUO>2.0.CO;2

Subdere, 2010, Plan Regional de Ordenamiento Territorial

Tallis, 2009, Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resource management, Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1162, 265, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04152.x

2011

TEEB, 2010, TEEB for local and regional policy makers report

van Jaarsveld, 2005, Measuring conditions and trends in ecosystem services at multiple scales: the Southern African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (SAfMA) experience, Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 360, 425, 10.1098/rstb.2004.1594

Wende, 2012, Climate change mitigation and adaptation in strategic environmental assessment, Environ Impact Assess Rev, 32, 88, 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.04.003

Willis, 2007, A framework for assessing the impact of land use policy on community exposure to air toxics, J Environ Manage, 83, 213, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.03.011

Wischmeier, 1978, Predicting rainfall erosion losses: a guide to conservation planning, 537

Zhu, 2011, An inquiry into the potential of scenario analysis for dealing with uncertainty in strategic environmental assessment in China, Environ Impact Assess Rev, 31, 538, 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.02.001