Assessing readability formula differences with written health information materials: Application, results, and recommendations
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Kutner, 2006
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 2010
D'Alessandro, 2001, The readability of pediatric patient education materials on the World Wide Web, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 155, 807, 10.1001/archpedi.155.7.807
Wolf, 2006, A critical review of FDA-approved medication guides, Patient Educ Couns, 62, 316, 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.010
Paasche-Orlow, 2003, Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability, N Engl J Med, 348, 721, 10.1056/NEJMsa021212
Kimberlin CL, Winterstein AG. Expert and consumer evaluation of consumer medication information—2008 (Final report to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration), University of Florida, November 4, 2008.
Svarstad, 2003, Evaluation of written prescription information provided in community pharmacies: a study in eight states, J Am Pharm Assoc (2003), 43, 383, 10.1331/154434503321831102
Svarstad, 2005, Expert and consumer evaluation of patient medication leaflets provided in U.S. pharmacies, J Am Pharm Assoc (2003), 45, 443, 10.1331/1544345054475586
Vallance, 2008, Suitability and readability assessment of educational print resources related to physical activity: implications and recommendations for practice, Patient Educ Couns, 72, 342, 10.1016/j.pec.2008.03.010
Matthews, 2002
DuBay, 2004
Gunning, 1968
Sticht, 1973, Research toward the design, development and evaluation of a job-functional literacy training program for the United States Army, Lit Discuss, 4, 339
Dale, 1948
McCall, 1979
McLaughlin, 1969, SMOG grading: a new readability formula, J Read, 12, 639
Powers, 1958, A recalculation of four adult readability formulas, J Educ Psychol, 49, 99, 10.1037/h0043254
Chall, 1995
Ley, 1996, The use of readability formulas in health care, Psychol Health Med, 1, 7, 10.1080/13548509608400003
Friedman, 2006, A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information, Health Educ Behav, 33, 352, 10.1177/1090198105277329
Doak, 1996
Meade, 1991, Readability formulas: cautions and criteria, Patient Educ Couns, 17, 153, 10.1016/0738-3991(91)90017-Y
Mailloux, 1995, How reliable is computerized assessment of readability?, Comput Nurs, 13, 221
Spadaro, 1980, Assessing readability of patient information materials, Am J Hosp Pharm, 37, 215
Spadero, 1983, Assessing readability of patient information materials, Pediatr Nurs, 9, 274
National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL). Available at: http://nces.edu.gov/naal/index.asp. Accessed 22.07.09.
Wolters Kluwer. OvidSP. Available at: http://www.ovid.com/site/index.jsp. Accessed 22.07.09.
American Academy of Family Physicians, 2007, Information from your family doctor. Depression in children and teens, Am Fam Physician, 75, 83
American Academy of Family Physicians, 2006, Information from your family doctor. Depression: what you should know, Am Fam Physician, 74, 1395
American Academy of Family Physicians, 2008, Information from your family doctor. Treating depression: what you should know, Am Fam Physician, 77, 795
Familydoctor.org editorial staff. Depression. 2008. Available at: http://familydoctor.org/online/famdocen/home/common/mentalhealth/depression/046.print.printerview.html. Accessed 10.06.09.
Apothecon. Desyrel. 2005. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2005/18207s030lbl.pdf. Accessed 22.05.09.
Lily. Prozac. 2009. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2009/018936s075s077lbl.pdf. Accessed 22.05.09.
National Health Information Center. Talk with your doctor about depression. Available at: http://www.healthfinder.gov/prevention/PrintTopic.aspx?topicID=33. Accessed 10.6.09.
Mayo Clinic Staff. Depression (Major depression). 2008. Available at: http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/depression/DS00175/METHOD=print. Accessed 10.06.09.
American Psychiatric Association. A closer look at major depression. 2001. Available at: http://www.medem.com/medlib/print/ZZZ3J5DV2KC. Accessed 10.06.09.
Medline Plus. Depression. Available at: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/print/depression.html. Accessed 10.06.09.
NIH Senior Health. Depression. Available at: http://nihseniorhealth.gov/depression/printerFriendly.html?allTopics=entireTopic&images=. Accessed 3.08.09.
Parkland Patient Education Department of Nursing Education. About depression. 2004. Available at: http://www.parklandhospital.com/patients_visitors/health_information/pdf/IH-I/I-119Abt%20Depr.pdf. Accessed 8.06.09.
New M. Depression. 2007. Available at: http://kidshealth.org/PageManager.jsp?dn=KidsHealth&lic=1&ps=207&cat_id=20448&article_set=32845. Accessed 10.06.09.
World Health Organization. Depression. Available at: http://www.who.int/mental_health/management/depression/definition/en/print.html. Accessed 10.06.09.
University of Oklahoma Health Science Center. Robert M. Bird Library. Consumer/patient info. Available at: http://library.ouhsc.edu/HP_Home.cfm?where=Site_Content/Reference/RI_ConsumerInfo.cfm. Accessed 10.06.09.
Barrett, 2008
Kincaid, 1975
Fry, 1968, A readability formula that saves time, J Reading, 11, 513
Caylor, 1973
2005
2005
2006
Olson, 1986, A question of reading validity, J Res Dev Educ, 19, 33
Bruce B, Rubin A, Starr K. Why readability formulas fail. Reading Education Report No. 28, University of Illinois, Urbana Center for the Study of Reading, 1981. BBN-R-4715.
Bormuth, 1968, New developments in readability research, 1
Taylor, 1953, “Cloze procedure”: a new tool for measuring readability, J Q, 30, 415
Flesch, 1949
Jorgenson, 1975, An analysis of teacher judgments of reading level, Am Educ Res J, 12, 67, 10.3102/00028312012001067
McLaughlin GH. SMOG readability calculator. 2008. Available at: http://www.harrymclaughlin.com/SMOG.htm. Accessed 10.06.09.
Gray, 1935
Klare, 1954