Assessing household wealth in health studies in developing countries: a comparison of participatory wealth ranking and survey techniques from rural South Africa

Emerging Themes in Epidemiology - Tập 4 - Trang 1-9 - 2007
James R Hargreaves1,2, Linda A Morison1, John SS Gear2, Julia C Kim1,2, Mzamani B Makhubele2, John DH Porter1, Charlotte Watts1, Paul M Pronyk1,2
1London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
2Rural AIDS and Development Action Research Programme, Acornhoek, South Africa

Tóm tắt

Accurate tools for assessing household wealth are essential for many health studies in developing countries. Household survey and participatory wealth ranking (PWR) are two approaches to generate data for this purpose. A household survey and PWR were conducted among eight villages in rural South Africa. We developed three indicators of household wealth using the data. One indicator used PWR data only, one used principal components analysis to combine data from the survey, while the final indicator used survey data combined in a manner informed by the PWR. We assessed internal consistency of the indices and assessed their level of agreement in ranking household wealth. Food security, asset ownership, housing quality and employment were important indicators of household wealth. PWR, consisting of three independent rankings of 9671 households, showed a high level of internal consistency (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.81, 95% CI 0.79–0.82). Data on 1429 households were available from all three techniques. There was moderate agreement in ranking households into wealth tertiles between the two indicators based on survey data (spearman rho = 0.69, kappa = 0.43), but only limited agreement between these techniques and the PWR data (spearman rho = 0.38 and 0.31, kappa = 0.20 and 0.17). Both PWR and household survey can provide a rapid assessment of household wealth. Each technique had strengths and weaknesses. Reasons for differences might include data inaccuracies or limitations in the methods by which information was weighted. Alternatively, the techniques may measure different things. More research is needed to increase the validity of measures of socioeconomic position used in health studies in developing countries.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Morris SS, Carletto C, Hoddinott J, Christiaensen LJM: Validity of rapid estimates of household wealth and income for health surveys in rural Africa. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000, 54: 381-387. 10.1136/jech.54.5.381 Booysen Fle R: Using demographic and health surveys to measure poverty- an application to South Africa. J Econ Economet. 2002, 26 (3): 53-70. Durkin MS, Islam S, Hasan ZM, Zaman SS: Measures of socioeconomic status for child heath research: comparative results from Bangladesh and Pakistan. Soc Sci Med. 1994, 38 (9): 1289-1297. 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90192-9 Filmer D, Pritchett LH: Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data - or tears: an application to educational enrolments in states of India. Demography. 2001, 38 (1): 115-132. Henry C, Sharma M, Lapenu C, Zeller M: Assessing the relative poverty of microfinance clients. A CGAP operational tool. Washington D.C. , International Food Policy Research Institute; 2000. Sahn DE, Stifel D: Exploring alternative measures of welfare in the absence of expenditure data. Rev Inc Wealth. 2003, 49 (4): 463-489. 10.1111/j.0034-6586.2003.00100.x. Schellenberg JA, Victora CG, Mushi A, de Savigny D, Schellenberg D, Mshinda H, Bryce J: Inequities among the very poor: health care for children in rural southern Tanzania. Lancet. 2003, 361: 561-566. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12515-9 Houweling TA, Kunst AE, Mackenbach JP: Measuring health inequality among children in developing countries: does the choice of the indicator of economic status matter?. Int J Equity Health. 2003, 2 (1): 8 10.1186/1475-9276-2-8 Lindelow M: Sometimes more equal than others: How the choice of welfare indicator can affect the measurement of health inequalities and the incidence of public spending. Oxford , Centre for Study of African Economies, University of Oxford; 2002. Vyas S, Kumaranayake L: Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis. Health Policy Plan. 2006, 21 (6): 459-468. 10.1093/heapol/czl029 McGee R: Analysis of participatory poverty assessment (PPA) and household survey findings on poverty trends in Uganda. Brighton , Institute for Development Studies; 2000. Adams AM, Evans TG, Mohammed R, Farnsworth J: Socioeconomic stratification by wealth ranking: Is it valid?. World Dev. 1997, 25 (7): 1165-1172. 10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00024-7. Barahona C, Levy S: How to generate statistics and influence policy using participatory methods in research. Reading , Statistical Services Centre; 2002. Chambers R: Participation and numbers. Q-Squared Working Paper No 13 2005. Scoones I: Investigating difference: Applications of wealth ranking and household survey approaches among farming households in Southern Zimbabwe. Dev Change. 1995, 26: 67-88. Temu AE, Due JM: Participatory appraisal approaches versus sample survey data collection: a case of smallholder farmers well-being ranking in Njombo District, Tanzania. J Afr Econ 2000. Kahn K, Collinson M, Tollman S, Wolff B, Garenne M, Clark SJ: Health consequences of migration: Evidence from South Africa's rural northeast: Johannesburg. ; 2993. Lestrade-Jefferis J: The labour market. In The People of South Africa Population Census 1996 Edited by: Udjo EO. Pretoria , Statistics South Africa; 2000. McIntyre D, Muirhead D, Gilson L: Geographic patterns of deprivation in South Africa: informing health equity analyses and public resource allocation strategies. Health Policy Plan. 2002, 17 (Suppl 1): 30-39. 10.1093/heapol/17.suppl_1.30. Udjo EO, Lestrade-Jefferis J: Demographic Profile of South Africa. In The People of South Africa Population Census 1996 Edited by: Udjo EO. Pretoria , Statistics South Africa; 2000. Pronyk PM, Hargreaves JR, Kim JC, Morison LA, Phetla G, Watts C, Busza J, Porter JDH: Effect of a structural intervention for the prevention of intimate partner violence and HIV in rural South Africa: results of a cluster randomized trial. Lancet. 2006, In Press: Simanowitz A, Nkuna B: Participatory Wealth Ranking Operational Manual. Tzaneen , Small Enterprise Foundation; 1998. Simanowitz A, Nkuna B, Kasim S: Overcoming the obstacles of identifying the poorest families. Unpublished Report ; 2000. Hargreaves JR, Morison LA, Gear J, Porter JDH, Makhubele MB, Kim JC, Busza J, Watts C, Pronyk PM: "Hearing the voices of the poor": Assigning poverty lines on the basis of local perceptions of poverty; a quantitative analysis of qualitative data from participatory wealth ranking in rural South Africa. World Dev. 2007, 35 (2): 212-229. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.10.021. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.10.021 Muller R, Buttner P: A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients. Stat Med. 1994, 13: 2465-2476. 10.1002/sim.4780132310 Falkingham J, Namazie C: Measuring health and poverty: a review of approaches to identifying the poor. London , DFID; 2002. Bergeron G, Morris SS, Medina Banegas JM: How reliable are group informant ratings? A test of food security ratings in Honduras. World Dev. 1998, 26 (10): 1893-1902. 10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00087-4. Hosegood V: An alternative approach to defining households in Southern Africa. In African Households Edited by: Van de Walle E. Illinois , Illinois Press; 2003. Lurie M: Migration and AIDS in southern Africa: a review. S Afr J Sci. 2000, 96: 343-347. May J, Carter M, Posel D: The composition and persistence of poverty in rural South Africa:An entitlements approach. In Policy Paper 15 Johannesburg , Land and Agriculture Policy Centre; 1995.