Assessing faculty research productivity in graduate public policy programs
Tóm tắt
This study assesses the faculty research productivity of 23 graduate public policy programs, and is based upon data from the Social Sciences Citations Index. The results clearly show that a handful of policy programs have outstanding research records: UC Berkeley, Princeton, Michigan, Chicago, Duke, Carnegie-Mellon, Rand, Syracuse, and, of course, Harvard. Most of the rest also have quite commendable records by this criterion.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Cole, Jonathan R. and Harriet Zuckerman (1982). The Productivity Puzzle: Persistence and Change in Patterns of Publication of Men and Women Scientists, Working Paper#87-2, Center for the Social Sciences at Columbia University, September.
Ellwood, John William (1982). A Morphology of Graduate Education for Public Service, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Spring.
Jones, Lyle V. (1980). “The assessment of scholarship,” Directions for Program Evaluation 6: 1–20.
Morgan, David R., Kenneth J. Meier, Richard C. Kearney, Steven W. Hays, and Harold B. Birch (1981). “Reputation and productivity among U.S. public administration and public affairs programs,” Public Administrative Review 41 (6): 666–673.
Robey, J. S. (1982). “Major contributors to public policy analysis,” Policy Studies Journal 10 (3): 442–447.
Schneider, J. A., N. J. Stevens and L. G. Tornatsky (1982). “Policy research and analysis: An empirical profile, 1975–1980,” Policy Sciences 15 (2): 99–114.