Artificial intelligence and disability: too much promise, yet too little substance?

Alan Turing Institute.: AI and Inclusion (2019). https://www.turing.ac.uk/research/research-projects/ai-and-inclusion. Accessed 5 Aug 2020

Bennett, C.L., Keyes, O.: What is the point of fairness? Disability, AI and the complexity of justice. In: ASSETS 2019 Workshop—AI Fairness for People with Disabilities (2019)

Clandinin, D.J., Connelly, F.M.: Handbook of qualitative research. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln Y.S. (eds.). Sage, Thousand Oaks (1994)

Coeckelbergh, M.: Health care, capabilities, and AI assistive technologies. Ethical Theory Moral Pract. 13(2), 181–190 (2010)

Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think. A restatement of the relation of reflection thinking to the educative process (Revised edition), Boston: DC Health. ISBN 0-486-25895.

Ellis, C.: The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel About Autoethnography. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek (2004)

Ellis, C., Adams, T.E., Arthur, P.B.: Autoethnography: an overview. In: Historical Social Research/Historische sozialforschung, pp. 273–290 (2011)

EU High-Level Expert Group on AI.: Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (2019)

Flanagan, J.C.: The Critical Incident Technique. Psychological Bulletin, vol. 51, no. 4. Diunduh dari (1954). https://www.apa.org/pubs/databases/psycinfo/citarticle.pdf

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Schafer, B.: AI4People—an ethical framework for a good AI society: opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Mind. Mach. 28(4), 689–707 (2018)

Ford Foundation.: Disability Inclusion (2020). https://www.fordfoundation.org/about/about-ford/disability-inclusion/. Accessed 5 Aug 2020

Guo, A., Kamar, E., Vaughan, J.W., Wallach, H., Morris, M.R.:. Toward Fairness in AI for People with Disabilities: A Research Roadmap (2019). arXiv:1907.02227

Holman Jones, S.: Autoethnography: making the personal political. In: Norman, Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2005)

Lillywhite, A., Wolbring, G.: Coverage of ethics within the artificial intelligence and machine learning academic literature: the case of disabled people. Assist. Technol. 1–7 (2019)

Marx, K., Engels, F.: Wage-labor and capital. Labor News Company, New York (1902)

Mathur, N.: Chrome’s new feature uses AI to describe images for blind and low-vision users. Mashable SE Asia (2020). https://in.mashable.com/tech/7510/chromes-new-feature-uses-ai-to-describe-images-for-blind-and-lowvision-users. Accessed 26 Aug 2020

OpenAI Charter.: (2020). https://openai.com/charter/. Accessed 5 Aug 2020

Schön, D.: The Reflective Practitioner. Basic Books, New York (1983)

Shakespeare, T.: Social models of disability and other life strategies. Scand. J. Disabil. Res. 6(1), 8–21 (2004)

Trewin, S.: AI fairness for people with disabilities: point of view (2018). arXiv:1811.10670

Tweed, A.: Ethics, Machine Learning and Disabilities (2019). https://abilitynet.org.uk/news-blogs/ethics-machine-learning-and-disabilities. Accessed 5 Aug 2020

UPIAS: Fundamental Principles of Disability. UPIAS, London (1976)

Warwick, P.: Reflective practice: some notes on the development of the notion of professional reflection. In: ESCalate (2007)

White, J.J.: Fairness of AI for people with disabilities: problem analysis and interdisciplinary collaboration. ACM SIGACCESS Access. Comput. 125, 1 (2020)

World Health Organisation (WHO).: Assistive technology (2018). https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/assistive-technology. Accessed 5 Aug 2020

Yozbatiran, N., Berliner, J., O’Malley, M.K., Pehlivan, A.U., Kadivar, Z., Boake, C., Francisco, G.E.: Robotic training and clinical assessment of upper extremity movements after spinal cord injury: a single case report. J. Rehabil. Med. 44(2), 186–188 (2012)