Artificial agency, consciousness, and the criteria for moral agency: what properties must an artificial agent have to be a moral agent?

Kenneth Einar Himma1
1Department of Philosophy, Seattle Pacific University, Seattle, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

K. Coleman. Computing and Moral Responsibility. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/computing-responsibility/ , 2004.

A. Eshleman. Moral Responsibility. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility/ , 2001.

L. Floridi. Information Ethics: On the Philosophical Foundation of Computer Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 1(1): 37–56, 1999.

L. Floridi and J. Sanders. Artificial Evil and the Foundation of Computer Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 3(1): 56–66, 2001.

K.E. Himma. What is a Problem for All is a Problem for None: Substance Dualism, Physicalism, and the Mind-body Problem. American Philosophical Quarterly, 42(2): 81–92, 2005.

D. Johnson. Computer Systems: Moral Entities but not Moral Agents. Ethics and Information Technology, 8(4): 195–204, 2006.

F.W.J. Keulartz et al. Pragmatism in Progress. Techne: Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Technology, 7(3): 38–49, 2004.

J. Kim. Reasons and the First Person. In J. Bransen and S. Cuypers, editors, Human Action, Deliberation, and Causation, pp. 67–87. Kluwer Publishers, Dordrecht, 1998.

B. Latour. On Technical Mediation – Philosophy, Sociology, Genealogy. Common Knowledge, 3: 29–64, 1994.

K. Miller and D. Larson. Angels and Artifacts: Moral Agents in the Age of Computers and Networks. Journal of Information, Communication & Ethics in Society, 3(3): 113, 2005.

J. Moor. Reason, Relativity, and Responsibility in Computer Ethics. Computers and Society, 28(1): 14–21, 1998.