Artificial agency, consciousness, and the criteria for moral agency: what properties must an artificial agent have to be a moral agent?
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
K. Coleman. Computing and Moral Responsibility. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/computing-responsibility/ , 2004.
A. Eshleman. Moral Responsibility. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility/ , 2001.
L. Floridi. Information Ethics: On the Philosophical Foundation of Computer Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 1(1): 37–56, 1999.
L. Floridi and J. Sanders. Artificial Evil and the Foundation of Computer Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 3(1): 56–66, 2001.
K.E. Himma. What is a Problem for All is a Problem for None: Substance Dualism, Physicalism, and the Mind-body Problem. American Philosophical Quarterly, 42(2): 81–92, 2005.
D. Johnson. Computer Systems: Moral Entities but not Moral Agents. Ethics and Information Technology, 8(4): 195–204, 2006.
F.W.J. Keulartz et al. Pragmatism in Progress. Techne: Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Technology, 7(3): 38–49, 2004.
J. Kim. Reasons and the First Person. In J. Bransen and S. Cuypers, editors, Human Action, Deliberation, and Causation, pp. 67–87. Kluwer Publishers, Dordrecht, 1998.
B. Latour. On Technical Mediation – Philosophy, Sociology, Genealogy. Common Knowledge, 3: 29–64, 1994.
K. Miller and D. Larson. Angels and Artifacts: Moral Agents in the Age of Computers and Networks. Journal of Information, Communication & Ethics in Society, 3(3): 113, 2005.