Artificial Intelligence and Orthopaedics
Tóm tắt
➤ Artificial intelligence (AI) provides machines with the ability to perform tasks using algorithms governed by pattern recognition and self-correction on large amounts of data to narrow options in order to avoid errors. ➤ The 4 things necessary for AI in medicine include big data sets, powerful computers, cloud computing, and open source algorithmic development. ➤ The use of AI in health care continues to expand, and its impact on orthopaedic surgery can already be found in diverse areas such as image recognition, risk prediction, patient-specific payment models, and clinical decision-making. ➤ Just as the business of medicine was once considered outside the domain of the orthopaedic surgeon, emerging technologies such as AI warrant ownership, leverage, and application by the orthopaedic surgeon to improve the care that we provide to the patients we serve. ➤ AI could provide solutions to factors contributing to physician burnout and medical mistakes. However, challenges regarding the ethical deployment, regulation, and the clinical superiority of AI over traditional statistics and decision-making remain to be resolved.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Hashimoto, 2018 Jul, Artificial intelligence in surgery: promises and perils, Ann Surg., 268, 70, 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002693
Naylor, 2018, On the prospects for a (deep) learning health care system, JAMA., 320, 1099, 10.1001/jama.2018.11103
Bini, 2018, Artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, and cognitive computing: what do these terms mean and how will they impact health care?, J Arthroplasty., 33, 2358, 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.067
Reznik, 2018, Understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on orthopaedic surgery, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS Now).
Cabitza, 2018, Machine learning in orthopedics: a literature review, Front Bioeng Biotechnol., 6, 75, 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00075
Galbusera, 2019, Artificial intelligence and machine learning in spine research, JOR Spine., 2, e1044, 10.1002/jsp2.1044
Urish, 2013, T2 texture index of cartilage can predict early symptomatic OA progression: data from the osteoarthritis initiative, Osteoarthritis Cartilage., 21, 1550, 10.1016/j.joca.2013.06.007
Chen, 2017, Decaying relevance of clinical data towards future decisions in data-driven inpatient clinical order sets, Int J Med Inform., 102, 71, 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.03.006
Shi, 2013, Artificial neural network models for predicting 1-year mortality in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures in China, Braz J Med Biol Res., 46, 993, 10.1590/1414-431X20132948
Ramkumar, 2019, Preoperative prediction of value metrics and a patient-specific payment model for primary total hip arthroplasty: development and validation of a deep learning model, J Arthroplasty., 34, 2228, 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.055
Kohane, 2015, Health care policy. Ten things we have to do to achieve precision medicine, Science., 349, 37, 10.1126/science.aab1328
Chiang, 2017, Data collection and analysis using wearable sensors for monitoring knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty, Sensors (Basel)., 17, 418, 10.3390/s17020418
Ramkumar, 2017, Open mHealth architecture: a primer for tomorrow’s orthopedic surgeon and introduction to its use in lower extremity arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty., 32, 1058, 10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.019
Ravi, 2017, Deep learning for health informatics, IEEE J Biomed Health Inform., 21, 4, 10.1109/JBHI.2016.2636665
Ramkumar, 2019, Remote patient monitoring using mobile health for total knee arthroplasty: validation of a wearable and machine learning-based surveillance platform, J Arthroplasty., 34, 2253, 10.1016/j.arth.2019.05.021
Ramkumar, 2018, Mobile technology and telemedicine for shoulder range of motion: validation of a motion-based machine-learning software development kit, J Shoulder Elbow Surg., 27, 1198, 10.1016/j.jse.2018.01.013
Ramkumar, 2019, Artificial intelligence and arthroplasty at a single institution: real-world applications of machine learning to big data, value-based care, mobile health, and remote patient monitoring, J Arthroplasty., 34, 2204, 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.018
Christodoulou, 2019, A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models, J Clin Epidemiol., 110, 12, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.004
Miller, 2019, Predictive abilities of machine learning techniques may be limited by dataset characteristics: insights from the UNOS database, J Card Fail., 25, 479, 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.01.018
Akbilgic, 2019, The promise of machine learning: when will it be delivered?, J Card Fail., 25, 484, 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.04.006
Feldman, 2019, Quantifying sex bias in clinical studies at scale with automated data extraction, JAMA Netw Open., 2, e196700, 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6700
Oh, 2015, Diversity in clinical and biomedical research: a promise yet to be fulfilled, PLoS Med., 12, e1001918, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001918
Finlayson, 2019, Adversarial attacks on medical machine learning, Science., 363, 1287, 10.1126/science.aaw4399
Hwang, 2019, Lifecycle regulation of artificial intelligence- and machine learning-based software devices in medicine, JAMA., 10.1001/jama.2019.16842
Cabitza, 2017, Unintended consequences of machine learning in medicine, JAMA., 318, 517, 10.1001/jama.2017.7797
Thong, 2016, Three-dimensional morphology study of surgical adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patient from encoded geometric models, Eur Spine J., 25, 3104, 10.1007/s00586-016-4426-3
Olczak, 2017, Artificial intelligence for analyzing orthopedic trauma radiographs, Acta Orthop., 88, 581, 10.1080/17453674.2017.1344459
Kruse, 2017, Machine learning principles can improve hip fracture prediction, Calcif Tissue Int., 100, 348, 10.1007/s00223-017-0238-7
Cilla, 2017, Machine learning techniques for the optimization of joint replacements: application to a short-stem hip implant, PloS One., 12, e0183755, 10.1371/journal.pone.0183755
Konda, Predictive software helps optimize efficient care for older patients with orthopedic fractures. NYU Langone Health, Orthopedic Surgery 2018 Year in Review.
Karnuta, 2019, Bundled care for hip fractures: a machine-learning approach to an untenable patient-specific payment model, J Orthop Trauma, 33, 324, 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001454
Shah, 2019 Oct, Variation in the thickness of knee cartilage. The use of a novel machine learning algorithm for cartilage segmentation of magnetic resonance images, J Arthroplasty., 34, 2210, 10.1016/j.arth.2019.07.022
Harris, 2019 Feb, Can machine learning methods produce accurate and easy-to-use prediction models of 30-day complications and mortality after knee or hip arthroplasty?, Clin Orthop Relat Res., 477, 452, 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000601
Fontana, 2019, Can machine learning algorithms predict which patients will achieve minimally clinically important differences from total joint arthroplasty?, Clin Orthop Relat Res., 477, 1267, 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000687
Leopold, 2019, Editor’s Spotlight/Take 5: Can machine learning algorithms predict which patients will achieve minimally clinically important differences from total joint arthroplasty?, Clin Orthop Rel Res., 477, 1262, 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000787